Serious question: why aren't so many startups hiring processes filtering out a candidate who is scamming/working multiple jobs?
Serious question: why aren't so many startups hiring processes filtering out a candidate who is scamming/working multiple jobs?
I'm no longer job searching but every interview involved multiple steps and "background checks."
I'm seeing the dude's resume has him working half a dozen jobs in a year which even to me is a huge red flag. Then he has a github with automated commits... I don't want to be disparaging to start ups because its brutal out there but how does someone like that have such a high success rate? Is he taking a super low salary or something?
Perhaps, he is also genuinely good at cracking these interviews. No wonder, he's been through so many of them.
Given these two factors, I don’t think it would be out of the realm of possibility for something like this to happen.
So, super easy to scam all of them with the same skillset and mannerism.
worked for us for almost a year and did a solid job (we also let him go when we discovered the multiple jobs)
When I used to interview I always had to check a box that said I wasn't currently employed, or they would ask at some point.
Cults are a subset of teams.
... why? If the guy's doing well by all metrics and not leaking IP, literally, who cares?
1) from the employer side, this runs afoul of all MBA theory and practice, so he could have been more profits. Almost by definition, this means you're not getting the maximum out of the guy. Oh and there's jealousy of course.
2) from employee's side, this runs afoul of union thinking. Those jobs could have employed 5 people, maybe more. Oh and there's jealousy of course.
So I think that finding about multiple employment is actually about realizing he was lying the whole time with the excuses.
(Hell, every so often various companies randomly decide that I and someone with almost the same full name as I are the same person, even without that person ever having had an account with the company, and then it's a pain to straighten it out because they all claim they have no insight into where those black box systems pull this information...yes, I'm really quite sure that I did not have a lease on this kind of car before I was born.)
Doubly so, I imagine, if you're not in the US, depending on whether you're an actual FTE or a contractor or what.
I find it hard to be sympathetic to the companies though, really - given how quickly the organizations that love to use family metaphors and imagery to describe their culture will drop people if it's inconvenient for the company, I don't think they get to cry foul on someone thinking they're entitled to the work as promised and nothing else.
I can tell you it's because he's actually a very skilled engineer. He will blow the interviews completely out of the water. Easily top 1% or top 0.1% of candidates -- other startups will tell you this as well.
The problem is when the job (or work-trial in our case) actually starts, it's just excuses upon excuses as to why he's missing a meeting, or why the PR was pushed late. The excuses become more ridiculous and unbelievable, up until it's obvious he's just lying.
Other people in this thread are incorrect, it's not a dev. shop. I worked with Soham in-person for 2 days during the work-trial process, he's good. He left half of each day with some excuse about meeting a lawyer.
Like, I can't wrap my head around this many people having some kind of experience with a single guy who's claim to be fame is basically gaming the interview process at an incredible amount of Y Combinator startups.
Why didn't he get the option to remain an anonymous scandal?
We don't need to know his name to discuss his actions.
If you write something for one startup, you can use it in other startups too
So, some people like him fit easily for them all
Just imagine being one of the people who legit joins a startup, is passionate, working long hours, earning your vest, to have your coworker pretending to be working.
revskill•7h ago
Seriously, a good programmer cares about good abstraction, not the correct cloud setup.
Those startups are worth the scam, it's skill issue all the way down.