frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Ask HN: Anyone Using a Mac Studio for Local AI/LLM?

44•UmYeahNo•1d ago•27 comments

Ask HN: Ideas for small ways to make the world a better place

10•jlmcgraw•9h ago•17 comments

Ask HN: Non-profit, volunteers run org needs CRM. Is Odoo Community a good sol.?

2•netfortius•4h ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Non AI-obsessed tech forums

18•nanocat•7h ago•13 comments

Ask HN: 10 months since the Llama-4 release: what happened to Meta AI?

42•Invictus0•1d ago•11 comments

AI Regex Scientist: A self-improving regex solver

6•PranoyP•11h ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (February 2026)

139•whoishiring•4d ago•513 comments

Ask HN: Who is hiring? (February 2026)

312•whoishiring•4d ago•511 comments

Tell HN: Another round of Zendesk email spam

104•Philpax•2d ago•54 comments

Ask HN: Any International Job Boards for International Workers?

2•15charslong•7h ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Is Connecting via SSH Risky?

19•atrevbot•2d ago•37 comments

Ask HN: Why LLM providers sell access instead of consulting services?

4•pera•17h ago•13 comments

Ask HN: Has your whole engineering team gone big into AI coding? How's it going?

17•jchung•1d ago•12 comments

Ask HN: What is the most complicated Algorithm you came up with yourself?

3•meffmadd•19h ago•7 comments

Ask HN: How does ChatGPT decide which websites to recommend?

5•nworley•1d ago•11 comments

Ask HN: Is it just me or are most businesses insane?

7•justenough•1d ago•5 comments

Ask HN: Mem0 stores memories, but doesn't learn user patterns

9•fliellerjulian•2d ago•6 comments

Ask HN: Is there anyone here who still uses slide rules?

123•blenderob•3d ago•122 comments

Ask HN: Anyone Seeing YT ads related to chats on ChatGPT?

2•guhsnamih•1d ago•4 comments

Ask HN: Does global decoupling from the USA signal comeback of the desktop app?

5•wewewedxfgdf•1d ago•2 comments

Kernighan on Programming

170•chrisjj•4d ago•61 comments

We built a serverless GPU inference platform with predictable latency

5•QubridAI•2d ago•1 comments

Ask HN: How Did You Validate?

4•haute_cuisine•1d ago•4 comments

Ask HN: Does a good "read it later" app exist?

8•buchanae•3d ago•18 comments

Ask HN: Have you been fired because of AI?

17•s-stude•3d ago•15 comments

Ask HN: Cheap laptop for Linux without GUI (for writing)

15•locusofself•3d ago•16 comments

Ask HN: Anyone have a "sovereign" solution for phone calls?

12•kldg•3d ago•1 comments

Test management tools for automation heavy teams

2•Divyakurian•1d ago•2 comments

Ask HN: OpenClaw users, what is your token spend?

14•8cvor6j844qw_d6•4d ago•6 comments

Ask HN: Has anybody moved their local community off of Facebook groups?

23•madsohm•4d ago•18 comments
Open in hackernews

A client wants to buy old SaaS app – smart move or risk?

6•AbbeyRoadRunner•7mo ago
We’re a small software house that’s been developing a niche SaaS platform for cultural events over the past 15 years. The product works well, but we were thinking to rebuild it for the next year.

Recently, a well-known national brand — not in tech, but operating in retail — approached us. As part of their PR strategy, they run a medium-sized cultural festival once a year in their home country.

They want to use our platform — but with a hard no to licensing. They’ve had bad past experiences where vendors either raised prices or disappeared, leaving them stranded.

We’re currently in a bidding process, alongside other companies. From what we understand, most competitors are creative agencies likely to: • build something from scratch, or • white-label past projects from similar events.

We estimate that building this kind of event app from scratch would cost around $60,000.

The options we’ve considered so far are:

1. Give them a snapshot of our current codebase, with no support, onboarding, or guarantees. This isn’t ideal — they would need to hire someone else to burn time understanding the architecture and logic before they could even begin implementing or customizing it. It’s slow and wasteful, considering we already know the product inside-out. 2. Give them a snapshot of the code and charge separately for the extra features they’ve asked for (that we don’t yet support). Based on our estimates, development would cost them between $13,500 (optimistic) and $38,000 (pessimistic) if done externally. 3. Same as above, but instead of giving them the code directly, we place it in escrow with a law firm of their choice. If we go out of business, or suddenly triple our rates to lock them in, they’d have the right to release the source and continue working with another vendor. This gives them peace of mind without requiring a full transfer up front.

*Ask HN: What would you do in our shoes?* Any strategic, technical, or legal insights are welcome. Has anyone navigated something similar?

Comments

eschneider•7mo ago
You're going to HAVE to give them support, if only to get them setup. Think long and hard if selling this sort of on-prem version of your product makes sense for YOU. If not, it's likely going to be an expensive distraction and just tell the customer no, you don't sell and support product X that way.

They very likely will be back and if not, no hard feelings.

AbbeyRoadRunner•7mo ago
It does have much sense what you say. So 1. is off the table.

What I am pondering on is how much is worth the IP or to take it from another angle - how much should I charge for it as it's ready now (so we can ship it tomorrow vs. they have to wait for development) + it has been tested in the field so most of QA phase is gone.

nivertech•7mo ago
1. Just agree to not raise the prices above some inflation-linked index.

2. Giving commercial project AS-IS without support is a no-no, and might be illegal in some jurisdictions.

3. Sell them a bank of on-prem support hours.

csomar•7mo ago
I don't know about your circumstances but if I was small, I would completely disregard this.

> We’re currently in a bidding process, alongside other companies. From what we understand, most competitors are creative agencies likely to: • build something from scratch, or • white-label past projects from similar events.

They are not interested in you. They just reached out to platforms to do price/feature/whatever discovery. They might decide on one of them, go with a friend or do nothing.

Do you want to expand time on this? Again, I don't know about your circumstances and don't have much info beyond what you are giving us but I wouldn't.

HenryBemis•7mo ago
What is the(ir) reputation? Do they delay payments? Do they try to find reasons not to pay?

I will oversimplify this (and I work like this when I have to pick a service (anything from SaaS to hiring one of them Big4+2 for a project): I want jeans. I look around. I buy jeans. I am willing to pay full price for jeans. I give proper project reqs/scope of work up front. If they fuck up, I fuck them usiny with the SLA/OLA. I also shit on them to anyone who ever brings them back (with real and damning info). If they do a good/great/their job, I "marry" them until the end of time.

If these guys "appreciate" you what you are, go for it. If they make you jump through 100 hoops then a) tht already picked option Z and they want the rest of you to voluntarily drop out of the race either through pricing (keep adding reqs and keeping the price fixed), or through features (keep adding reqs that they KNOW/sense you cannot deliver e.g. 'oh your app doesn't do liquids? too bad we wanted espresso to go with it).

Either way.. (and judging by the numbers you provided): - from scratch 60k - enhance 13k-38k

Even at the lower end (13k) it is still (almost) 25% of the whole thing..

Doesn't look like a good deal for you.

AbbeyRoadRunner•7mo ago
1. Don't know anything about their rep. Big corp, that's all we know.

2. I do think they appreciate, we offer what they need in time which suits them. That's only my opinion TBH, they said twice that amongst other offers some bidders also have a ready-to-launch product. Maybe it's true, maybe it's a bluff.

3. Yeah, I was thinking about 50% more which makes it 27k $. Or maybe it should be 100%? I am balancing between not beeing greedy, and having a fair cut.

smart10xgenius•7mo ago
Let it go. Your IP is embedded in the platform and too many unknown outcomes post sale.

Also, you will absolutely will be forced to provide support. Maybe not in the contracting document but by the regulators.