frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Ask HN: Opus 4.6 ignoring instructions, how to use 4.5 in Claude Code instead?

2•Chance-Device•6h ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Anyone Using a Mac Studio for Local AI/LLM?

49•UmYeahNo•2d ago•30 comments

Ask HN: Ideas for small ways to make the world a better place

21•jlmcgraw•1d ago•22 comments

Ask HN: Non AI-obsessed tech forums

34•nanocat•1d ago•28 comments

Ask HN: 10 months since the Llama-4 release: what happened to Meta AI?

45•Invictus0•1d ago•11 comments

Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (February 2026)

139•whoishiring•5d ago•525 comments

Ask HN: Who is hiring? (February 2026)

313•whoishiring•5d ago•515 comments

LLMs are powerful, but enterprises are deterministic by nature

5•prateekdalal•15h ago•7 comments

AI Regex Scientist: A self-improving regex solver

7•PranoyP•1d ago•1 comments

Tell HN: Another round of Zendesk email spam

105•Philpax•3d ago•54 comments

Ask HN: Non-profit, volunteers run org needs CRM. Is Odoo Community a good sol.?

2•netfortius•23h ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Is Connecting via SSH Risky?

19•atrevbot•2d ago•37 comments

Ask HN: Has your whole engineering team gone big into AI coding? How's it going?

18•jchung•2d ago•14 comments

Ask HN: Is there anyone here who still uses slide rules?

123•blenderob•4d ago•122 comments

Ask HN: How does ChatGPT decide which websites to recommend?

5•nworley•2d ago•11 comments

Ask HN: Mem0 stores memories, but doesn't learn user patterns

9•fliellerjulian•3d ago•6 comments

Kernighan on Programming

171•chrisjj•5d ago•61 comments

Ask HN: Why LLM providers sell access instead of consulting services?

5•pera•1d ago•13 comments

Ask HN: Is it just me or are most businesses insane?

8•justenough•2d ago•7 comments

Ask HN: What is the most complicated Algorithm you came up with yourself?

3•meffmadd•1d ago•7 comments

Ask HN: Anyone Seeing YT ads related to chats on ChatGPT?

2•guhsnamih•1d ago•4 comments

Ask HN: Does global decoupling from the USA signal comeback of the desktop app?

5•wewewedxfgdf•2d ago•3 comments

We built a serverless GPU inference platform with predictable latency

5•QubridAI•2d ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Does a good "read it later" app exist?

8•buchanae•3d ago•18 comments

Ask HN: Have you been fired because of AI?

17•s-stude•4d ago•15 comments

Ask HN: Anyone have a "sovereign" solution for phone calls?

12•kldg•4d ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Cheap laptop for Linux without GUI (for writing)

15•locusofself•4d ago•16 comments

GitHub Actions Have "Major Outage"

53•graton•5d ago•17 comments

Ask HN: Has anybody moved their local community off of Facebook groups?

23•madsohm•5d ago•20 comments

Ask HN: OpenClaw users, what is your token spend?

14•8cvor6j844qw_d6•5d ago•6 comments
Open in hackernews

Google Ends Support for Lynx Browser

102•zhenyi•5mo ago
Accessing google.com in Lynx now shows:

  Google
  Update your browser
  Your browser isn't supported anymore. To continue your search, upgrade to a recent version. [Learn more]

Comments

stefanos82•5mo ago
Seems like elinks is affected too...bummer!
ryao•5mo ago
I wonder to what extent visually disabled internet users are affected by this, since I can imagine at least some of them using lynx with an on-screen reader for a terminal emulator.
bitpush•5mo ago
What's the advantage of using lynx as opposed to Chrome/Safari and using the read aloud features?
ryao•5mo ago
Ask someone who is visually impaired. I know that they historically use browsers that do not support JavaScript. I also am acquainted with one developer who uses software for reading his terminal outloud, although I never asked the specifics of what he uses for web browsing or IRC for that matter. I do know that he loves the iPhone.

That said, I just found this post by a blind person who uses Lynx and complained about it the last time Google broke Lynx support:

https://blind.guru/blog/2019-11-25-endofgoogle.html

tdeck•4mo ago
That may have been true decades ago but I think this is pretty marginal these days. All the Blind people I have talked to use mainstream browsers. GUI browsers actually provide more metadata to screen readers than something like Lynx can, and they actually work with websites people need to access.
duskwuff•4mo ago
Not to any meaningful degree. Lynx (or other terminal-based browsers) would be an extraordinarily poor choice of browser for a non-sighted user, as it lays text out visually in the terminal (e.g. using color and indentation to distinguish between types of text) and does not provide accessibility cues. Those users are much better served by standard GUI web browsers.
LargoLasskhyfv•5mo ago
Is Google exempted from the ADA?
bitpush•5mo ago
Safari offers https://www.apple.com/accessibility/ features, so I'm pretty sure someone with visual disability can access google no issues.
LargoLasskhyfv•5mo ago
Seriously? Apple only?

But Linux! And *BSD! Or some Illumos.

Or in general just some effin textmode terminal, running whatever is able to run Lynx/Links/Elinks(2?).

tdeck•4mo ago
On Linux you use Orca with your browser of choice. On Windows you use JAWS or NVDA with your browser of choice. All major browsers support screen readers.
ChrisArchitect•5mo ago
Suggest changing title to something along lines of "Tell HN: Accessing google in lynx now shows unsupported"

Maybe, like in 2019 when a similar submission got traction, you'll be able to get it restored.

(I am no longer able to use Google with Lynx https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21626995)

userbinator•4mo ago
Try asking the Google employee there directly if you can.
ChrisArchitect•5mo ago
Related discussion earlier this year:

Google begins requiring JavaScript for Google Search

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42747092

TorstenK•4mo ago
When resources are an issue, this does matter. I use to store previous Lynx/ Links search results in history lists, to allow browsing within local files later. Creating such lists with Firefox is a mess. (This browser tends to block my Thinpad for hours.) Really sad. Google was a key to the internet. Torsten
samtheDamned•5mo ago
maybe this is a knee-jerk reaction but I don't see any good reason for this. At it's core Google's job is to take an input and list outputs. The marketshare of people using lynx is small enough that whatever advertising or ai extras they want to squeeze in won't be meaningfully impacted by not working on lynx.

Edit: corrected spelling error

pachouli-please•5mo ago
Google's job is to sell ads, not provide accessibility to text-only browsers.

(for the record I grow to dislike g more every day, and also this move)

codedokode•5mo ago
Internet marketers can misuse this to send lot of automated requests instead of paying for API access.
bdhcuidbebe•4mo ago
Lol, what?

Anyone can spoof UA…

codedokode•4mo ago
Standard Google page can use JS and WASM to fingerprint device and detect bots. No-JS page cannot detect bots so it makes sense to shut it down to prevent using it for bot detection bypass.
bdhcuidbebe•4mo ago
That is besides the point.

I can spoof UA today with lynx, curl or what ever that isnt executing js.

See topic.

salted-fry•5mo ago
I just tested changing user agents in Chrome - setting UA to a random string like "fff" gets a search page, but setting it to "Links" or "Lynx" gets "Your browser isn't supported anymore" - which is to say, this doesn't look accidental, but more like these UAs are specifically being blocked.

EDIT: Forging user agent in Links (with links -http.fake-user-agent) gets a usable homepage, but the results page just sends you to a turn-on-your-javascript page.

extraduder_ire•4mo ago
My impression is that support for less common browsers and other unusual uses of google products has survived due to pet interest by individual googlers and not any sort of widespread policy.
kn0where•4mo ago
A lot of those individual googlers are longtimers who are now leaving after 15, 20 years. Google has been offering voluntary exit packages this year and I suspect the kind of people who would value Google.com working in Lynx are also the type who have made plenty of money and are disillusioned by what the company has become.
eimrine•4mo ago
Google loves to search the result with a real URL but since I make any click on that result Google replaces it with some referral link. For example, if I want to open the result not from my connection but from Tor I need to clean each link by hand or even type it from scratch. I am sure this ban was made for poisoning UX for console guys too. What a pity I didn't know I could search from console browser and having more easy life.
Elfener•4mo ago
This extension removes that behaviour: https://github.com/Rob--W/dont-track-me-google
teejmya•5mo ago
Try http://frogfind.com/
benbristow•5mo ago
Server error
userbinator•4mo ago
I wonder if an Invidious or Nitter-like solution will be coming soon, as no doubt me and countless others, although still a minority, are now truly motivated to do something about it.

These bastards have truly ruined what's left of the open Internet. Google, FUCK YOU!

gh02t•4mo ago
For search, you mean? SearXNG has been around for a while and is excellent. I have used it for years as my main search. Not sure if it supports lynx but a least they don't arbitrarily block it.
bdhcuidbebe•4mo ago
You wonder…

Just google it.

https://search.sethforprivacy.com/

How do kids today even survive online?

userbinator•4mo ago
Just google it.

You might want to take a look at the context.

bdhcuidbebe•4mo ago
And you need to calibrate your humor ;-)
horseradish7k•4mo ago
4get is pretty decent
RAM-bunctious•4mo ago
I don't feel it's particularly controversial to think that Javascript shouldn't be a requirement to use the internet. This is one step towards making that the case.
rgreekguy•4mo ago
From a normal browser (don't ask me what I mean by that), with its normal/default user agent, Google search does not work without Javascript. I think at all, any more, but at some point I had got rate limited of sorts, after using the search without Javascript for a little, I got a prompt to enable it.
anon1395•4mo ago
Seems like they are cracking down on people who use Google without JavaScript.
maltelandwehr•4mo ago
This is more about requiring JavaScript that blocking specific browsers. I think all the new LLM labs (plus all the tools offering SEO services for LLM-based search and answer engines) finally reached a limit of scraping that Google no longer can sustain.
flaptrap•4mo ago
The most efficient way to search is to read the text. Waiting for images to download and then admire them cannot improve that. It looks like Google has lost relevance and is telling us, again.
hulitu•4mo ago
> The most efficient way to search is to read the text.

"Maybe for you"

> Waiting for images to download and then admire them cannot improve that.

"It does improve the way we track you"

> It looks like Google has lost relevance and is telling us, again.

They just got patted on the back by regulators in US so they don't give a fsck.

SnuffBox•4mo ago
I noticed this the other day as I (previously) used an old Firefox UA to get a more simple, streamlined legacy interface. I don't know why they did this.
xacky•4mo ago
Internet Explorer versions below 11 are getting the message too. Impacting those who use legacy Windows versions.
d--b•4mo ago
yet another use for https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45181535
hieloz•4mo ago
whoogle search is affected now.