Yes, you’re right! Our roadmap and tools are focused on helping non-technical users who build apps with platforms like Lovable, v0, etc. The “bug” isn’t just about clicking a link and it not working. For example, we’re also working on things like: 1. Branding analysis and design drift detection (this happens a lot in vibe-coded designs — e.g., one page uses a purple gradient, another uses a completely different style, which breaks consistency). 2. checking how a new user would actually interact with your app, to see if the flow makes sense.

A crawler alone is just a static check. Our north star is trying to fix the last step from vibe coding to the production, like spawning a browser user agent that actually navigates through the app like a first-time user. Another roadmap idea is to build a browser agent that connects with coding AIs (like Cursor or Claude) to provide automated testing right after a feature is implemented. For example, when we use Claude to build something, we constantly have to flip between the terminal and browser to keep design consistent. The thought is: what if Claude’s code had “eyes” to test what it just built in real time?

Overall, thanks so much for your response. honestly I didn’t expect anyone to reply. This is my first time on HN, and it’s been an awesome interaction!