frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Telegram's founder Pavel Durov sends alarmist message to all Telegram users

13•skerit•52m ago•5 comments

Ask HN: How are founders finding investors without warm intros in 2025?

2•paulwilsonn•1h ago•2 comments

Looking for 5 B2C startups or agencies to pilot next-gen product discovery

2•AdityaBuilds•4h ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Build Your Own LLM?

5•retube•4h ago•6 comments

Ask HN: Does anyone want to take on the payment processing networks with me?

10•ziyadparekh•19h ago•8 comments

Ask HN: Anyone using Cursor/Claude Code for non-coding workflows?

4•opuslabs•23h ago•2 comments

Ask HN: Most effective way to reduce excessive digital media consumption?

14•SeanAnderson•1d ago•34 comments

Ask HN: How to find a non-technical co-founder/sales person?

8•darkhorse13•23h ago•9 comments

GitHub Actions seem to be down

8•arbol•23h ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Why aren't wet labs more automated?

5•andrewrn•1d ago•6 comments

Ask HN: Low entry barrier hobby that can potentially generate income?

8•shivajikobardan•1d ago•12 comments

Ask HN: Any advice on pivoting out of VC-backed tech?

87•AbstractH24•4d ago•60 comments

Ask HN: Great Firewall in Iran?

10•minebreaker•2d ago•13 comments

Ask HN: Why is software quality collapsing?

69•razoorka•5d ago•112 comments

Ask HN: Do you roll your own agent or use a framework?

11•break_the_bank•3d ago•7 comments

Ask HN: Why did COM/SOAP/other protocols fail?

26•smj-edison•6d ago•56 comments

From Docker Desktop (300% CPU) to Colima and Portainer (0.2%) on macOS

11•muthuishere•3d ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Career Burnout Looking for Options

20•ultrasounder•2d ago•26 comments

Ask HN: What do you wish existed? (October 2025)

11•pwlm•3d ago•17 comments

Will BEP29 of BitTorrent be updated in the near future?

6•Xquenda•3d ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Apple won't let me sign up for the developer program. What do I do?

2•Jean-Philipe•4d ago•2 comments

Ask HN: What's the best hackable smart TV?

3•xrd•4d ago•1 comments

You've reached the end!

Open in hackernews

Cerebras: The AI hardware giant facing imminent collapse

22•noob_hardy•5d ago
Post by ex-employee.

In the cutthroat AI world, Cerebras Systems, despite colossal wafers and bold claims, faces collapse. Its fragile foundation stems from brittle hardware, astonishingly narrow in practical application. Optimized primarily for LLaMA model finetuning, touted "speed boosts" often use speculative decoding, masking that many "supported" models run inefficiently, if at all. This rigidity mirrors a Formula 1 engine demanding one fuel under lab conditions.

This compounds with a poorly conceived software and kernel stack. The current infrastructure restricts Cerebras systems almost exclusively to LLaMA-family transformer LLMs. Modern vision pipelines, diffusion models, or other AI paradigms are beyond reach. In a rapidly evolving field, this narrow focus is a death sentence. A complete software overhaul is desperately needed, yet internal motivation is absent, hinting at leadership either oblivious or unwilling to invest in survival. Technical woes are exacerbated by third-class ML expertise and rudderless, top-down leadership. Non-technical decision-makers lead to misguided strategies and poor adaptation. ML expertise is subpar and highly politicized; questionable ideas from figures like Head of AI Ganesh Venkatesh are reportedly prioritized, wasting resources. An extreme resource shortage – Cerebras hardware and even GPUs – cripples meaningful work, making numbers in reports untrustworthy fiction. The chasm between rhetoric and reality widens.

A palpable resignation within the ranks further indicts the company. Employees are "waiting it out" or trading stocks, not contributing. This disengagement highlights deep problems, where personal finance trumps innovation.

Cerebras appears a bloated, incompetent, and culturally bankrupt company. Any stock price would be a scam. The rare "A players" have left or are leaving.

The writing is on the wall. Cerebras, despite grand pronouncements, is a company built on sand, destined to crumble under its limitations and poor choices.

Get out while you still can.

Comments

hanqix7•5d ago
I thought Cerebras mainly focused on inference not finetuning/training.
binsquare•5d ago
There's not much concrete evidence to support any of the claims made here. Also nothing on blind. Account is made recently and this is the only post.

Suspicious post

taklimakan•5d ago
It might be a new account for privacy reasons. Folks can choose whether to believe them or not. If the company is really doomed, we’ll know soon enough.
alcasa•4d ago
There is a german idiom "Totgesagte leben länger" (the ones assumed dead, live longer).

Just because a business might be unsound, doesn't necessarily mean it will imminently collapse.

There is a lot of money going around right now and at its core Cerebras is a hardware company and their core innovation is in hardware.

At its core Cerebras is a hardware company. If they would have been able to just sell hardware that would be great, but for now I think the available speedups are not really worth it to most people to reengineer their software to fit the computation model outside of a few niche problems and TCO is pretty high.

But given the amount of resources being poured into AI right now, a lot of these tradeoffs don't seem so far out anymore. The main open question I guess is whether their architecture will be a good fit for whatever requirements come in the future (think continuous training and RL stuff). Their architecture is sufficiently different, so there might be some valid reasoning to hedge your bets.

imdoxxingme•5d ago
"the writing is on the wall" - "just raise $1B to expand" ...
leakycap•4d ago
80+% of business comes from one UAE based customer?

9/2024 filing at https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/2021728/000162828024...

> "Group 42 Holding Ltd (together with its affiliates, “G42”) accounted for 83% and 87%, respectively, of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2023 and six months ended June 30, 2024. Our dependence on our relationship with G42 subjects us to a number of risks."

Is this on top of other concerns being floated?

bjourne•2d ago
Is this related to the withdrawn IPO filing?