frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Ask HN: How to stop an AWS bot sending 2B requests/month?

268•lgats•2d ago•172 comments

Ask HN: Estimation of copyright material used by LLM

3•megamix•5h ago•2 comments

Ask HN: How does one build large front end apps without a framework like React?

104•thepianodan•1d ago•178 comments

Ask HN: What would an ideal matchmaking platform look like today?

7•grandimam•11h ago•8 comments

Why is my chat speaking non-words like um and uh?

4•dataspun•15h ago•3 comments

Ask HN: DOS Based "Multitaskers"

3•alexshendi•15h ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Web app freezes, but not when Chrome is recording. How to debug?

5•febed•2d ago•2 comments

Ask HN: What are you working on? (October 2025)

344•david927•6d ago•1039 comments

Ask HN: Abandoned/dead projects you think died before their time and why?

358•ofalkaed•1w ago•886 comments

Ask HN: Codex is too slow. Is there any solution?

5•rule2025•1d ago•4 comments

Ask HN: How to properly show my skills for startup roles?

8•arabello•2d ago•16 comments

Ask HN: How do you do CI/CD in 2025?

11•labarilem•2d ago•7 comments

I wanted to work on a newsletter but I realized I was building a cage around it

6•yuwahhid•1d ago•7 comments

Ask HN: Best way to create a searchable knowledge base?

20•aljgz•2d ago•23 comments

Ask HN: Claude Code with Multiple Models?

6•iosifnicolae2•2d ago•2 comments

Ask HN: Is it worth it to build projects from scratch or should I just use AI?

5•numcap•1d ago•9 comments

Ask HN: Best way to use Analytics data (from Google Analytics)

2•jamesclar•1d ago•2 comments

Ask HN: What are some of your favorite documentaries?

16•itdude•5d ago•23 comments

Ask HN: Does anyone have scans of these missing PC Plus issues (1991–1993)?

4•billpg•3d ago•2 comments

Sexbots Are Coming to ChatGPT

15•nutanc•4d ago•22 comments

Ask HN: Blogs / Sites / Channels for agentic coding topics

9•d_sc•4d ago•1 comments

Ask HN: What's the best alternative to Dragon NaturallySpeaking?

29•Openai2•1w ago•10 comments

Ask HN: VLMS-Powered Search Engine on macOS?

4•allenleein•2d ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Locally enabled vibe coding environment?

8•p0w3n3d•5d ago•3 comments

Ask HN: Which cross platform desktop GUI to use instead of Electron?

16•tones411•5d ago•14 comments

You've reached the end!

Open in hackernews

Ask HN: What would an ideal matchmaking platform look like today?

7•grandimam•11h ago
Most dating and matchmaking apps still use the same model — profiles, photos, swipes, filters but human relationships and expectations have evolved a lot in the last decade.

If you were to design a matchmaking platform from scratch today, what would it look like?

How would you handle:

- Trust, authenticity, and privacy in an age of AI and deepfakes? - Cultural and regional diversity without stereotyping? - Real compatibility beyond surface-level traits? - Balancing data-driven matching with human intuition? - Building something that encourages long-term relationships, not just short-term engagement?

Curious to hear from people who think about product design, social systems, ethics, and human connection.

Comments

gigatree•9h ago
Idk if any use these today because I haven’t used one in years, but I’d do things that improve trust and quality:

- high cost

- human verification, background check, personality assessment

- mandate profile “about me” video

- “things that interest me” section on profile. Could be funny videos, memes, books, shows.

- have in-person mingling events

- monthly 1:1 coaching

Would launch in one city first, heavily advertise, be selective on who to let in and only launch once there’s enough people to open it up.

Only have a certain amount of people in at once, let in new people as existing couples leave. People that are too selective get kicked out.

raw_anon_1111•7h ago
It wouldn’t matter what you used you would have the same problems - it would become a sausage fest where if you aren’t over 6 tall, you wouldn’t get any matches.

Dating apps are 60-80% men from my brief cursory research.

Before someone thinks I’m an incel, I’ve never used a dating app and have been married for 15 years.

throwaway808081•6h ago
I'd give the app four walls and have it host a variety of events.
bobthe3•6h ago
This. Nothing can beat meeting other in person. Coffee shops, clubs, and other meeting spots. Nothing beats a coffee shop dj rave pop up.
muzani•6h ago
There's a joke that everyone who tries to solve their own problem makes a dating app. I think that's half of the problem - the people making the apps are amateurs, while the happily married people don't feel a need to make them.

Catfishing has always been around. AI doesn't make it much worse. It's a temporary problem.

Compatibility is overrated IMO. I'm probably incompatible with my wife on many levels. I don't know a lot of people who are fully compatible with their spouses. If he's not abusive, if she's not manipulative, it's probably going to work out.

Part of the romance is wanting to make it work despite the obstacles. If I could optimize for anything, it's for platforms matching people willing to make it work. Coffee Meets Bagel does a decent job at this by forcing the two to not talk with others. Muzz goes even further and lets you meet the dad to propose marriage.

gngoo•5h ago
Have you seen the black mirror episode; Hang the DJ? Exactly like that.
moomoo11•4h ago
Controversial but I wouldn't use photos/media at all. At least not as the "main" feature where the actual metric is user engagement, not outcomes. I've worked on a massive, successful dating app before, so I have a bunch of ideas. I also created an app 4-5 years ago but shelved it due to COVID lol.

The challenge is making money on outcomes. There's more money to be made in ongoing care than complete prevention, for example.

impendia•49m ago
"Human relationships and expectations have evolved a lot in the last decade"

Is this really true? I agree they've changed some, but a lot?

In any case, I'll take a stab at your question. Not thinking about how to make money, just how to make something successful from the users' point of view.

I really enjoyed OKCupid in its heyday, circa 2010. I only got a few dates out of it, but the site was genuinely fun. Profiles were long, with multiple essays, and this was very much encouraged. The personality tests were also fun -- and the founders discovered that questions like "Do you enjoy horror movies?", "Have you ever been to another country by yourself?", and even "Do you like the taste of beer?" predicted compatibility much better than trite questions. There was no notion of a "match", messaging worked like email and you could write to anyone on the site.

As the founders said, "OKCupid does a fantastic job at matching you with people who claim to be what you claim to want." I loved the tongue-in-cheek humor and the site's awareness of its own limitations. And you had to put in a little bit of effort to use the site, which was very much a good thing.

OKCupid still exists, but it's a shadow of its former self nowadays.

How to improve? Maybe a slight barrier to engagement, such as a few tailored questions you have to answer for each person before messaging someone. (To prevent men from sending out messages to every women in sight. Or at least make it more difficult...)

Or, something like, if you look at a profile, then you can't navigate away for at least twenty seconds. Again, to prevent you from messaging too many people, or dismissing lots of people instantly.

I believe that the biggest issue with dating sites is that it's hard to align the incentives of the user with the incentive of the site owner. Not sure how you solve that one.