frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Discuss – Do AI agents deserve all the hype they are getting?

2•MicroWagie•13m ago•0 comments

LLMs are powerful, but enterprises are deterministic by nature

3•prateekdalal•4h ago•2 comments

Ask HN: Anyone Using a Mac Studio for Local AI/LLM?

47•UmYeahNo•1d ago•29 comments

Ask HN: Non AI-obsessed tech forums

25•nanocat•15h ago•21 comments

Ask HN: Ideas for small ways to make the world a better place

15•jlmcgraw•17h ago•19 comments

Ask HN: 10 months since the Llama-4 release: what happened to Meta AI?

44•Invictus0•1d ago•11 comments

Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (February 2026)

139•whoishiring•4d ago•515 comments

Ask HN: Who is hiring? (February 2026)

313•whoishiring•4d ago•512 comments

Ask HN: Non-profit, volunteers run org needs CRM. Is Odoo Community a good sol.?

2•netfortius•12h ago•1 comments

AI Regex Scientist: A self-improving regex solver

7•PranoyP•19h ago•1 comments

Tell HN: Another round of Zendesk email spam

104•Philpax•2d ago•54 comments

Ask HN: Is Connecting via SSH Risky?

19•atrevbot•2d ago•37 comments

Ask HN: Has your whole engineering team gone big into AI coding? How's it going?

18•jchung•2d ago•12 comments

Ask HN: Why LLM providers sell access instead of consulting services?

5•pera•1d ago•13 comments

Ask HN: What is the most complicated Algorithm you came up with yourself?

3•meffmadd•1d ago•7 comments

Ask HN: How does ChatGPT decide which websites to recommend?

5•nworley•1d ago•11 comments

Ask HN: Is it just me or are most businesses insane?

8•justenough•1d ago•7 comments

Ask HN: Mem0 stores memories, but doesn't learn user patterns

9•fliellerjulian•2d ago•6 comments

Ask HN: Is there anyone here who still uses slide rules?

123•blenderob•3d ago•122 comments

Kernighan on Programming

170•chrisjj•4d ago•61 comments

Ask HN: Any International Job Boards for International Workers?

2•15charslong•14h ago•2 comments

Ask HN: Anyone Seeing YT ads related to chats on ChatGPT?

2•guhsnamih•1d ago•4 comments

Ask HN: Does global decoupling from the USA signal comeback of the desktop app?

5•wewewedxfgdf•1d ago•3 comments

We built a serverless GPU inference platform with predictable latency

5•QubridAI•2d ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Does a good "read it later" app exist?

8•buchanae•3d ago•18 comments

Ask HN: How Did You Validate?

4•haute_cuisine•1d ago•6 comments

Ask HN: Have you been fired because of AI?

17•s-stude•4d ago•15 comments

Ask HN: Cheap laptop for Linux without GUI (for writing)

15•locusofself•3d ago•16 comments

Ask HN: Anyone have a "sovereign" solution for phone calls?

12•kldg•4d ago•1 comments

Ask HN: OpenClaw users, what is your token spend?

14•8cvor6j844qw_d6•4d ago•6 comments
Open in hackernews

Anyone built an email or calendar assistant that syncs and indexes data?

5•Bahushruth•3mo ago
I’ve been exploring what it takes to build a simple email and calendar assistant that connects to Gmail and Google Calendar. The goal is to make it easy to search and reason over your own data in a useful way.

The part I’m still trying to figure out is how much data actually needs to be synced and indexed. Some tools seem to just call APIs on demand, while others keep everything in a local or vector store for faster retrieval.

If you’ve built something like this:

- Did you bother syncing and indexing the data, or just query live APIs?

- How painful is it to keep that data fresh without hitting rate limits?

- Did you use something like Merge.dev or Composio, or just wire it all up yourself?

I’m mostly trying to understand what the practical tradeoffs are before going too deep.

Comments

PaulHoule•3mo ago
I access gmail with the web client that comes with the iPhone and I've done the same with Android, performance is good enough in both cases. For that matter I've used the IMAP support in EM Client to access gmail.
rguldener•3mo ago
Founder of https://www.nango.dev here.

A lot of teams use us for their Gmail & Google calendar integrations.

If you want to run complex queries across large parts of the data, syncing + indexing on your side will be necessary. Limits on filters, pagination & rate limits make it infeasible to search across most of a user's inbox without tens of seconds to minutes of latency.

But before you sync all the data, I would test if your users actually need to run such queries.

Both Gmail & Google Calendar have a query endpoint that searches across many fields. I would start with a simple tool for your agent to run queries on that, and expand from there if necessary.

Both Nango and Composio could do this for you.

With Nango, you would also get syncs on the same platform, if it turns out you need them.

Hope this helps!

Bahushruth•3mo ago
Thank you that is really helpful. Will check Nango out.

When teams integrate Gmail or other tools with Nango, what usually triggers them to start syncing data instead of just using the query endpoints? Is there a specific type of query or user behavior that makes them realize they need to index and sync data? Just curious

rguldener•3mo ago
It varies a lot. Which is why we always recommend to start with the feature requirements/user problem and work backwards from there.

Examples: - Low latency to show X last emails a person had with a specific email address

- Enriching data from the emails/calendar with other data from your product (E.g. mapping email recipients to contacts)

- Knowing when a calendar event has changed (sometimes also possible with webhooks)

- Detecting deletes (maybe also possible with webhooks, not sure for gmail/calendar)

isaachinman•3mo ago
Not quite sure what you're asking for. Are you asking for a GUI/cli, or something else?

I've built exactly what you're describing, but for the sake of a b2c product.

rogerkirkness•3mo ago
Convictional founder here. Our experience is different than others:

- We had to sync, pre process and index the data to make the resultant knowledge search outputs actually good. MCP totally fails at this by comparison.

- It is not hugely painful thanks to bulk APIs, in Gmail in particular, as well as webhooks. We implemented both of them and it works well (so far).

- We wired it all up ourselves. Given the conclusion we had about pre-processing and indexing being required to make it work well, this seems preferred.

I think that MCP and using an integration platform will ultimately not work for any kind of agentic or deep research task heavily depending on Gmail context.

yashgupta417•3mo ago
what is your company doing exactly?
rogerkirkness•3mo ago
Collaborative email, meeting recording, knowledge search and goal tracking in one thing. The search applies across emails and meetings, but also other things. We had to figure out whether it would be sufficiently good to connect third party tools, and basically concluded no. We did some research to understand why (1).

[1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.07106

Bahushruth•3mo ago
That’s really interesting, especially your point about preprocessing and indexing being required to make search outputs good. What was the first sign that made you realize querying live APIs wasn’t enough?

Was it latency, missing data, or just that results weren’t relevant? And when you say preprocessing, what kind of transformations or normalization ended up being most important?

rogerkirkness•3mo ago
Keywords or vector search on their own don't get good results for high entropy queries. MCP type approach is good for low entropy things like fact-based single source answers. [1]

[1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.07106