frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

LLMs are powerful, but enterprises are deterministic by nature

2•prateekdalal•27m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Anyone Using a Mac Studio for Local AI/LLM?

44•UmYeahNo•1d ago•28 comments

Ask HN: Ideas for small ways to make the world a better place

12•jlmcgraw•13h ago•18 comments

Ask HN: Non AI-obsessed tech forums

23•nanocat•11h ago•18 comments

Ask HN: 10 months since the Llama-4 release: what happened to Meta AI?

44•Invictus0•1d ago•11 comments

Ask HN: Non-profit, volunteers run org needs CRM. Is Odoo Community a good sol.?

2•netfortius•8h ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Who wants to be hired? (February 2026)

139•whoishiring•4d ago•514 comments

AI Regex Scientist: A self-improving regex solver

6•PranoyP•15h ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Who is hiring? (February 2026)

312•whoishiring•4d ago•511 comments

Tell HN: Another round of Zendesk email spam

104•Philpax•2d ago•54 comments

Ask HN: Is Connecting via SSH Risky?

19•atrevbot•2d ago•37 comments

Ask HN: Has your whole engineering team gone big into AI coding? How's it going?

17•jchung•2d ago•12 comments

Ask HN: Why LLM providers sell access instead of consulting services?

4•pera•21h ago•13 comments

Ask HN: What is the most complicated Algorithm you came up with yourself?

3•meffmadd•23h ago•7 comments

Ask HN: How does ChatGPT decide which websites to recommend?

5•nworley•1d ago•11 comments

Ask HN: Any International Job Boards for International Workers?

2•15charslong•10h ago•2 comments

Ask HN: Is it just me or are most businesses insane?

7•justenough•1d ago•6 comments

Ask HN: Mem0 stores memories, but doesn't learn user patterns

9•fliellerjulian•2d ago•6 comments

Ask HN: Is there anyone here who still uses slide rules?

123•blenderob•3d ago•122 comments

Kernighan on Programming

170•chrisjj•4d ago•61 comments

Ask HN: Anyone Seeing YT ads related to chats on ChatGPT?

2•guhsnamih•1d ago•4 comments

Ask HN: Does global decoupling from the USA signal comeback of the desktop app?

5•wewewedxfgdf•1d ago•2 comments

We built a serverless GPU inference platform with predictable latency

5•QubridAI•2d ago•1 comments

Ask HN: How Did You Validate?

4•haute_cuisine•1d ago•4 comments

Ask HN: Does a good "read it later" app exist?

8•buchanae•3d ago•18 comments

Ask HN: Have you been fired because of AI?

17•s-stude•4d ago•15 comments

Ask HN: Cheap laptop for Linux without GUI (for writing)

15•locusofself•3d ago•16 comments

Ask HN: Anyone have a "sovereign" solution for phone calls?

12•kldg•3d ago•1 comments

Test management tools for automation heavy teams

2•Divyakurian•1d ago•2 comments

Ask HN: OpenClaw users, what is your token spend?

14•8cvor6j844qw_d6•4d ago•6 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: What are some good unintuitive statistics problems?

6•ronbenton•1w ago
I am compiling some statistics problems that are interesting due to their unintuitive nature. some basic/well known examples are the monty hall problem and the birthday problem. What are some others I should add to my list? thank you!

Comments

dpforesi•1w ago
This isn't a "statistics" problem exactly, but rather a data science problem, but... Personality tests are usually framed as psychological instruments, but the core problem is statistical. They assume responses are noisy observations of a stable latent variable, when in practice they’re samples from a context-dependent decision process. Respondents condition on incentives, infer what’s being rewarded, and optimize accordingly, so the data-generating process shifts with each setting. From a statistical perspective this breaks identifiability: multiple latent personalities can produce the same observed responses, and the same personality can produce different responses under different incentive structures. Because those incentives are unobserved or only weakly observed, the model is fundamentally misspecified. More samples don’t converge on truth; they converge on a biased estimate of a strategic equilibrium rather than the latent trait itself.

On paper, I'm a real collaborator, because that is what I think the test should reveal about me. In reality, I just don't wanna deal with collaboration and I'd rather work alone. Can this be measured? Probably not, but it does present an odd paradox for data scientists to solve.

ben_w•1w ago
Here's one I did at A-level: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_paradox_(probability)
yshklarov•1w ago
It sounds like you're looking for problems in probability theory (rather than statistics). I don't have anything specific for you but you might have better luck searching for problems, puzzles, and examples in probability. For instance:

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2140493/counterintu...

what-if•1w ago
Look into a concept called "The curse of dimensionality". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_of_dimensionality
whattheheckheck•1w ago
Simpsons paradox and anscombe quartet are pretty good starters
austin-cheney•1w ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareto_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Mythical_Man-Month

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conway%27s_law

My own is what I call the framework rule. All discussions of software frameworks eventually degrade to first person pronouns and the word easy. Knowing that you can always predict your audience and their desires well in advance with extremely high confidence/precision. Easiness is an unmeasurable subjective concept whose second order consequences are always measurable and always cost more and which are likewise identifiable and predictable. That makes it similar to a fractal of Conways law but it applies more broadly.

shoo•1w ago
There are some interesting examples in the "The Book of Why" [y] by Pearl and Mackenzie. This book is all about causal inference & has examples from things like drug trials where the analysis and inferences drawn from analysing experimental data depend upon what causal model you assume is generating the data, and if you pick an analysis that implicitly assumes the wrong underlying causal structure then your inferences drawn from the data may be wrong. There's a chapter about the historical scientific debate around if smoking causes lung cancer.

Andrew Gelman has an interesting review of the book [g], from the perspective of someone working within the statistical establishment that Pearl's book often critiques.

[y] https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/judea-pearl/the-boo...

[g] https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2019/01/08/book-pearl...