But because the countries laws benefit the excessively rich, and the poor peoples' hard work to make the rich richer, means that these people have 0 protections whatsoever.
They are the second lowest economic class, the "can't even get W2 work". The lowest is 'homeless', who are already considered thrown away, societally speaking.
The deactivation is a different story, however.
And sure, homelessness, hunger, and low/no medical is a "choice", its not a choice we make lightly.
So worse is better than homeless. And people are stratified out of even the working class.
But they don't come with the freedom that gig jobs do which is their primary appeal.
And if the laws were actually enforced, most of it is blatantly illegal.
Illegal online taxi.
Illegal online food delivery.
Illegal residential hotel chain.
Etc.Many people who do this do so because they don't have other choices. And much of it is also illegal for the people "working", cause commercial driving requires commercial license.
It is a scam on everyone, except for the 'app companies' that basically added 'internet' to a regulated career and turned it into unregulated enshittified garbage.
>It is a scam on everyone, except for the 'app companies' that basically added 'internet' to a regulated career and turned it into unregulated enshittified garbage.
No, this predated "app companies". Taxi drivers were self-employed, only got paid if they got fares, and on top had to pay for the privilege of driving (medallion system). That's just as bad as working for Uber, if not worse (since you don't have to pay to work for Uber).
The existence of gig services is not responsible for poverty. Poverty is the natural state of all living things, and through much effort humanity has succeeded in partially eliminating poverty.
There is indeed a problem. Before we're able to achieve post-scarcity, we will reach a point where most people will not be able to provide sufficient value in a free market economy to sustain themselves comfortably. This problem was not caused by gig services or big corpo being evil or whatever people like to blame.
TOS as in the agreement to be served by Uber and use their network. Not the same thing as an employment contract, obviously.
Only after a NYT reporter started poking around, of course. How many others don’t have that going for them?
I'm retired (sort of) and my son lost his job. He had a house payment and that worried me. I noticed a girl at my local grocery store who seemed to be there every day. After questioning her, that's how I found out about Instacart. So I started with them.
I struggled with deliveries as most people do at first but eventually got quite good at it making a decent, even surprising amount of money. But, one day, I was scheduled to deliver groceries to an apartment with an address for the complex but no apartment number and no name on the apartment doors.
I contacted support who called the customer who asked if I could wait 15 minutes for them to come home. Having nothing going on that day I said, "Sure." 25 minutes later I called support again. Customer says they're almost there. "I'll wait," I said.
Customer doesn't show. Called support. They tell me to return the groceries to the store and that I would be paid anyway. (Note: grocery stores won't accept returns.)
Much of the driver support question was covered by text messages which I saved. Interestingly, later, the customer tipped me and apologized for not showing up. I saved all that along with a photo of the apartment complex.
The next day, I was deactivated for not abiding by the TOS for not delivering. I emailed them all the text messages including those from the customer and driver support along with screenshots and photos but to no avail.
A prime example of the modern day indentured servant: beholden to his creditors, subject to the whims of whoever pays him pennies for a dollars worth of work.
Uber's financial statements says drivers get around 70% of fares. You might think 30% is too high of a cut, but to imply that drivers are getting paid "pennies" is patently false.
https://investor.uber.com/news-events/news/press-release-det...
Staying in a city like that with that kind of income is financial suicide. He needed to move rather than take a low-paying job. Why didn't he?
Uber is able to charge little because at the other end they're able to pray on people who make bad financial decisions or have no other option for one reason or another. In a fair world they'd not only raise prices, but also lower their margin.
Yeah, it's called supply and demand. When supply is high, prices are low.
>In a fair world they'd not only raise prices
What do you think happens prices go up? Taxi prices are already high as it is. Raising the prices would mean less riders, which is arguably worse for those drivers. Moreover this is essentially price fixing, but I guess you're fine with it because it's not an evil corporation doing it?
bookofjoe•9mo ago