Join the W3C Exploration Interest Group: where standards start

https://www.w3.org/blog/2025/join-the-w3c-exploration-interest-group-where-standards-start/

60•pentagrama•9mo ago

Comments

zb3•9mo ago

Standards start at Google nowadays..

Y-bar•9mo ago

… And that's clearly a major concern because my front end developer colleagues treat everything that Google does as the one true way of the web. No matter if it is accepted into a standards body, or if the Chrome implementation is buggy, that is their target and every other browser is an after-thought at best.

Etheryte•9mo ago

I think this misses the point. If the vast majority of your users use something Chromium based, that's where you should put most of your effort. It doesn't matter if it's the right way or whatnot, your users only care about whether it works for them or not. Users don't care about the technicalities.

fuzzzerd•9mo ago

While true and a pragmatic approach, that's another part of the same root problem.

zcw100•9mo ago

Historically nothing has changed just who’s on top. Mosaic, Netscape, IE, Chrome…

zelon88•9mo ago

Considering the HTML provided by google dot com has 19 warnings and a Content-Security-Policy error for a page that only has a text field and a logo, I'm gonna take my chances and apply to become a W3C invited expert.

vntok•9mo ago

Surely they have pretty good reasons for doing things that way, don't you think?

That page is probably among the top 3 most analyzed, optimized and A/B tested webpages in the world.

zelon88•9mo ago

That's not my question to answer, though.

Google controls the browser, the page, the CDN, AND to a large extent the very standards that the browser has to comply with.

If what you claim is true, with all of this authority, why can't they write a compliant web page?

fouc•9mo ago

That's precisely why it seems likely to be deliberate, they could be playing 3D chess.

It could be a way to keep some kind of competitive edge or some kind of fingerprinting strategy or for some other reason altogether.

vntok•9mo ago

> If what you claim is true, with all of this authority, why can't they write a compliant web page?

I'm not sure why you'd think that they "can't" write a compliant web page. It's obvious they can, just like it's obvious they've been paying a bunch of experts top dollars for multiple decades to think about and test what exactly to write in this page's code. It's also obvious they've taken into account the basic fact that every character* they add costs them a measurable amount of money to serve given their scale.

It's therefore pretty obvious that they're deliberately choosing to write a non-compliant web page. Presumably because among the multiple billions of users they serve this page to, a high-enough-to-matter portion is still using old and/or non compliant web browsers and they don't want to cut them out.

* past certain packet length cutoffs

pjmlp•9mo ago

Yeah, everyone apparently failed to learn from IE lesson, and served the Web on a plate to Google.

They even ship Chrome with their applications, because people can't be bothered to learn neither native UI frameworks, nor portable Web standards.

hnuser123456•9mo ago

I think we should have a standard for browser extensions that allows extensions to inspect and drop requests for unwanted ad resources.

bryanlarsen•9mo ago

AFAICT, the W3C produces 2 types of standards:

- standards they write themselves that everyone ignores - standards they copy from the WHATWG

wizzwizz4•9mo ago

Which is ActivityPub?

bryanlarsen•9mo ago

If that's your best example of a well used w3c native standard, thanks for helping me prove my point.

immibis•9mo ago

An incompatible attempt at reformulating Mastodon Protocol. If you've ever actually tried to work with the protocol, you'll know the standard only loosely describes it. If you attempt to implement it by following the standard, you won't be compatible with anything else, because everything else implements Mastodon Protocol instead (and calls it ActivityPub).

wizzwizz4•9mo ago

Touché. Mastodon is the Internet Explorer of ActivityPub. There are other, non-Mastodon extensions, and some ActivityPub-spec functionality that Mastodon eschews but other implementations support, but overall this is an accurate summary. Especially regarding the C2S protocol: most apps just use the Mastodon API instead (see https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/10520).

robto•9mo ago

I think the RDF standards have produced many useful tools for those that work with graph data. And the W3C is a useful coordination place for new standards like Verifiable Credentials[0] and Decentralized identifiers[1] and JSON Linked Data[2], which are all being used in ActivityPub, Bluesky, and a lot of other decentralizing projects.

[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verifiable_credentials [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralized_identifier [2]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSON-LD

rhdunn•9mo ago

The CSS and specs are maintained by W3C and are widely implemented by browsers. Likewise for the WAI-ARIA, WCAG, MathML, and SVG specs.

The XML and related specs are implemented by various applications and libraries even if web browsers dislike these specs. -- They are used a lot in document publishing workflows that use formats like JATS, and are supported by various tools and libraries.

SVG is widely supported in vector graphics applications and rendering tools.

And WHATWG hasn't just co-opted W3C specs -- it's also co-opted encoding, URIs and others from places like the RFCs.

magicalist•9mo ago

> standards they write themselves that everyone ignores

CSS, WAI-ARIA, SVG, WebGPU, WebAuthn...and a large number of APIs that are referenced as part of the HTML spec but developed and standardized by different W3C groups.

> standards they copy from the WHATWG

Not for six years now: https://www.w3.org/blog/2019/w3c-and-whatwg-to-work-together...

Lots of hn people need to update their priors about modern web standardization work.

Show HN: Minecraft Creeper meets 90s Tamagotchi

Show HN: Termiteam – Control center for multiple AI agent terminals

The only U.S. particle collider shuts down

Ask HN: Why do purchased B2B email lists still have such poor deliverability?

Show HN: Remotion directory (videos and prompts)

Portable C Compiler

Show HN: Kokki – A "Dual-Core" System Prompt to Reduce LLM Hallucinations

Software Engineering Transformation 2026

Microsoft purges Win11 printer drivers, devices on borrowed time

Lunch with the FT: Tarek Mansour

Old Mexico and her lost provinces (1883)

'AI' is a dick move, redux

The source code was the moat. But not anymore

Does anyone else feel like their inbox has become their job?

An AI model that can read and diagnose a brain MRI in seconds

Dev with 5 of experience switched to Rails, what should I be careful about?

AlphaFace: High Fidelity and Real-Time Face Swapper Robust to Facial Pose

Scientists discover “levitating” time crystals that you can hold in your hand

Rammstein – Deutschland (C64 Cover, Real SID, 8-bit – 2019) [video]

Tell HN: Yet Another Round of Zendesk Spam

Postgres Message Queue (PGMQ)

Show HN: Django-rclone: Database and media backups for Django, powered by rclone

NY lawmakers proposed statewide data center moratorium

OpenClaw AI chatbots are running amok – these scientists are listening in

Show HN: AI agent forgets user preferences every session. This fixes it

Introduce the Vouch/Denouncement Contribution Model

Show HN: SSHcode – Always-On Claude Code/OpenCode over Tailscale and Hetzner

Microsoft appointed a quality czar. He has no direct reports and no budget

Multi-agent coordination on Claude Code: 8 production pain points and patterns

Washington Post CEO Will Lewis Steps Down After Stormy Tenure