Providing any value to the readers is way down the list of priorities
https://github.com/sam-paech/antislop-sampler/blob/main/slop...
https://github.com/sam-paech/antislop-sampler/blob/main/slop...
I guess we won't care eventually as a society but I admit this all makes me uncomfortable, as someone that fell in love with the internet as a communication tool.
It depends on how you use it.
I wonder whether the current technology is feasible for a replication of HAL.
- Very good chess player -> Check (And probably can be a top notch Go player too, although I don't play chess or go)
- Very good knowledge of history, science, technology, everything -> I'm not sure if it's possible. And I'd assume we need to send scans of all books, because for example it should know many fine details and educated guesses about a certain historical fact.
- Understand human language pretty well -> I actually think ChatGPT is good enough if I choose my wording clearly. But voice recognition might prose some challenges. It also depends on how good the microphone is.
- Have pretty good voice generation. I'd like to choose the voice too! -> I guess it's OK-ish nowadays? I listened to a few AI generated clips and they are pretty good, not sure how practical it is, though.
Anything else I missed? I know HAL also has its multi-decade objectives in mind, so this is different from the LLMs which don't seem to have a very long term of memory.
1 - for the pdf file, create a move command for a batch file which will rename the file using $<check amount>_<date from check in YYYY-MM-DD format>_<invoice id>_<PWS ID>_<name of company from Population line>.pdf as the filename.
All of English Wikipedia is about 100 GB. A local LLM that can run searches against a local Kiwix server would work. Local LLMs can’t really do this correctly yet, but it’s not inconceivable in 1-2 years.
(Some platforms are better than others, obviously.)
As the article points out, human connection is only valuable because it is hard and there's another human on the other end of the relationship. A perpetual yes-man or yes-woman on the end of an LLM could never be a reasonable replacement for human connection.
I can’t think of a way to introduce any meaningful reciprocity into a human-LLM relationship
I'm not convinced that's the only reason connection is valuable. We evolved as social primates and human beings which feared ostracism were likely selected for during that process. I think, for many people, even the illusion of human connection likely comes with improvements to one's sense of well being, which can have positive knock on effects elsewhere in life. Forging real human connections would obviously be preferable, but in their absence, a crutch is better than being hobbled.
But if you're looking for connection then less so. Personally I find even an idle chat about the weather with a random cashier to be more meaningful than a lengthy chatbot chat. On that front the empty calorie analogy seems 100%
I belong to more of those than I can easily count for CNC woodworking/machining....
I don't have any use for a mechanical friend who refuses to discuss politics months before any election and who stubbornly and haughtily gives wrong answers on any number of complex topics.
nluken•1w ago
"I was an extraterrestrial taking notes on the problems of Earth. Finding pizza in your area was a problem. People being mean to you because you were wearing your AirPods at dinner was a problem. Going on vacation was a problem because the hotels would force you to find the light switches. Elders were a problem. (They never took their medicine.) Loneliness was a problem, but loneliness had a solution, and the solution was conversation. But don’t talk with your elders, and not with the front desk, and certainly not with the man on the corner, though he might know where the pizza is. (“Noise-canceling is great, especially if you live urban,” said the earbuds guy. “There’s a lot of world out there.”) Idle chitchat was a snag in daily living. We’d rather slip through the world as silent as a burglar, seen by no one except our devices."
[1] https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-47/essays/an-age-of-hypera...
bluefirebrand•1w ago
The social fabric has been re-configured by the least socially adept people in society
I should know. I'm not terribly socially adept, I grew up on IRC channels and forums because I struggled to connect with people in person
But now everyone is on the internet, using social networks designed by people who aren't very social like me, or worse, people who only understand social interaction through a lens of "what can this person do for me"
We're in a really strange time.
I used to go online to get away from everyone and try to find other people like me
Now I have to go offline to in-person events hosting things that appeal to people like me, because everyone is online and there's no avoiding the crowd anymore
nh23423fefe•1w ago
Is this an explanation or a just-so insult?
itishappy•1w ago
Parenthesis added.
kaonwarb•1w ago
(And it was eminently clear in the comment that they were not claiming personally comprehensive credit for having designed social networks.)
Magma7404•1w ago
_Algernon_•1w ago
bluefirebrand•1w ago
Profit seeking is pretty explicitly anti-social behavior imo
dingnuts•1w ago
Whatever you have in mind is not commerce, but is probably regulatory capture or central planning.
dttze•1w ago
_Algernon_•1w ago
bluefirebrand•1w ago
You're right
The term I was looking for was more along the lines of "profit maximizing" or "profit motive":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profit_motive
My mistake
I hope people generally understood what I meant even if I didn't use the precisely correct term for this
onion2k•1w ago
AI doesn't do that. It's always going to be nice to you, and that feels good even if it's entirely artificial.
aaronbaugher•1w ago
Cynicism aside, that might be okay for some people. If you need to talk about something to get it out of your system, and you don't have any friends willing to listen to you cry in your beer for a couple hours, maybe "talking" to an AI isn't a terrible replacement. On the other hand, it's easy to imagine people turning it into a weird dependency if they stop thinking of it as a sort of sounding board and start seeing it as a real "friend."
dingnuts•1w ago
No?? It feels awful! I feel like an alien when I read comments like this. I would rather a negative but authentic and honest interaction than yet another yes-man or yes-bot being fake nice to me.
It feels condescending and fake and awful. I do not understand the appeal of talking to these machines at all, all they do is validate whatever you say and output empty flattery. It is obsequious as hell and it turns my stomach. You're better off talking to a literal mirror.
rurp•1w ago
onion2k•1w ago
init2null•1w ago
Or in other words, most people really don't want this. In fact, I'd suggest that those who tend toward depression, and who may need true support, are more skeptical of such false interactions.
mvdtnz•1w ago
Is that true? I don't feel like it is, at least not where I live. I would be really very shocked if someone told me to fuck off if I interacted with them in a public space.
Der_Einzige•1w ago
mock-possum•1w ago
I almost always have things in doing, places I’m going, thoughts I’m thinking, and they almost never involve other people. I barely need people to be present at all, most of the time.
That’s not to say I don’t like people - I don’t have any particular animosity, they can’t help being here any more than I can - and there are plenty of people I know and love and yearn to see again from time to time.
But most of the time? I could go days without human contact. Oh the idea alone makes me giddy!
atrettel•1w ago
I tend to think loneliness is more of a structural problem rather than an individual one --- that is, it is a consequence of how society as a whole structures our lives and interactions with people (for better or for worse). A generic person drives from their single family house by themselves to work, works largely by themselves (in many industries), and then drives back to their single family house. There is no "third place" for interaction with others and driving itself is isolating as a practice. With that kind of life as the structural default, there really isn't much chance of interaction in the first place. It's not an individual problem.