It seems to be missing some explanations regarding how the code is structured and how it performs error correction. I feel like there's little point in interacting with a system you don't understand or not trying to understand. And I also think there are cool ways to make those things interactive as well. Pick an image, then explain what the little squares in the corners are for and provide little interactivity to see how they affect the decoding. Then move on to the error correction. This step-by-step style of interactivity may be better, I'd think about that.

As for what is there, the first thing I don't like here is icons. The four icons in the lower-right corner (result data, format info, ..) are hard to distinguish, and are hard to correlate with the "history" tab. I'd probably either make them slightly different color, or actually simplifying these icons further might be a better option, just because they're so small.

But yeah it is pretty hard to tell what I'm interacting with, unfortunately. I don't know pretty much nothing about QR codes, and I don't know what the different kinds of errors are, what "EC" stands for etc.

UI should probably be rethought as well, because before I was writing the comment I had no idea I could switch a brush. Hell, I had no idea I was changing colors (the cursor covered half the space of the pixels, so I couldn't tell)

The idea's cool though, good work

Is there a way to get it to compute and visualize the MAXIMUM possible error rate for any given QR code? Like what is the greatest number and arrangement of pixels that could be altered before the QR code is no longer readable?

(Bonus: Is this a setting that can be controlled during QR code generation, based on version number or error correction level, etc.? Can you make some sort of huge and very complex QR code with a lot more redundancy than a smaller one?)