Tax them, and make sure it doesn't get passed along.
https://www.npr.org/2022/09/09/1121952184/the-impact-of-cali...
> VOGEL: It's such a large market so that anything which California acquires for its own product sold in its state is going to resonate among national and global companies. If you don't want to have to make separate products for California and the rest of the country, you might as well just make them according to California's standards.
2. California has dramatic experiments in cheap/free healthcare and is facing a giant budget shortfall due to it. Right now it is asking the Fed to backstop it's healthcare spending but that seems extremely unlikely.
So even California can't run free healthcare it seems, and it has been unable to build any train track due to extreme bureaucratic paralysis.
Certainly TikTok and Twitter are the primary targets here, but this could also hit smaller communities like Mastodon and Diaspora.
And even if the laws would apply only to larger communities, wouldn't this inhibit growth of smaller communities? If they grow too big, they'd be forced to abandon volunteering for more organized and salaried moderation.
This California tax momentum gives additional context for recent Zuck's arguments in the Meta antitrust hearing that Facebook isn't really "social media" anymore: https://www.newyorker.com/culture/infinite-scroll/mark-zucke...
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml...
For purposes of this division:
(a) “Social media platform” means a public or semipublic internet-based service or application that has users in California and that meets both of the following criteria:
(1) (A) A substantial function of the service or application is to connect users in order to allow users to interact socially with each other within the service or application.
(B) A service or application that provides email or direct messaging services shall not be considered to meet this criterion on the basis of that function alone.
(2) The service or application allows users to do all of the following:
(A) Construct a public or semipublic profile for purposes of signing into and using the service or application.
(B) Populate a list of other users with whom an individual shares a social connection within the system.
(C) Create or post content viewable by other users, including, but not limited to, on message boards, in chat rooms, or through a landing page or main feed that presents the user with content generated by other users.
So it looks like, but for 2B, Hackernews is a social media platform in the state of California. Sites like Github and Letterboxd arguably are.For a business, it is way easier to implement a block list than a method to collect and process taxes.
It would create Balkanization between Californians and everyone else.
duxup•9mo ago
So now something good like mental health funding is in part dependent on something bad ...
It strikes me as lazy public policy and perverse incentives.
lupusreal•9mo ago
sightbroke•9mo ago
Money for social programs must come from somewhere.
Using tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, gambling (for example) to raise funding for socially beneficial programs seem better than not doing it.
duxup•9mo ago
sightbroke•9mo ago
duxup•9mo ago
Nobody is going to be better off if the funding for their mental health services is cut off because X industry is having a bad time or gets reclassified or something else.
I see this happen with sin taxes and other funding sources with education programs all the time. Programs cut, people fired because their funding is some sin tax or very specific source that dried up. Important services like mental health and etc should be funded consistently.
sightbroke•9mo ago
It sounds good but where is it? Whom are you taxing or collecting funds from?
lupusreal•9mo ago
sightbroke•9mo ago
AND with vices people will do them regardless so maybe some social good is better than no good coming from it.
m0llusk•9mo ago
Steve16384•9mo ago