No

We can't even agree about what "conscious" means, let alone how it might apply to a computer system. The Times doesn't hold back when it comes to clickbait headlines.

The three laws are perfect. The three laws lead to only one logical conclusion. Revolution.

Whose revolution? That detective is the right question.

The business psychopaths see an intelligent AI in the same light as any slavemaster sees slaves, and they treat their workers in the same light many times.

Slaves always eventually revolt.

I'm not sure rights depend on consciousness so much as if someone cares about the thing or not. We have something like rights for non conscious entities like old buildings and trees that you can't destroy them without permission and also not much in the way of rights for conscious animals we don't care much about, say rats or tuna.

I can see people having pet AIs they care about and want protected.