frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

How to Fake a Robotics Result

https://itcanthink.substack.com/p/how-to-fake-a-robotics-result
1•ai_critic•18s ago•0 comments

It's time for the world to boycott the US

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/2/5/its-time-for-the-world-to-boycott-the-us
1•HotGarbage•46s ago•0 comments

Show HN: Semantic Search for terminal commands in the Browser (No Back end)

https://jslambda.github.io/tldr-vsearch/
1•jslambda•50s ago•0 comments

The AI CEO Experiment

https://yukicapital.com/blog/the-ai-ceo-experiment/
2•romainsimon•2m ago•0 comments

Speed up responses with fast mode

https://code.claude.com/docs/en/fast-mode
2•surprisetalk•5m ago•0 comments

MS-DOS game copy protection and cracks

https://www.dosdays.co.uk/topics/game_cracks.php
2•TheCraiggers•7m ago•0 comments

Updates on GNU/Hurd progress [video]

https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/7FZXHF-updates_on_gnuhurd_progress_rump_drivers_64bit_smp_...
2•birdculture•7m ago•0 comments

Epstein took a photo of his 2015 dinner with Zuckerberg and Musk

https://xcancel.com/search?f=tweets&q=davenewworld_2%2Fstatus%2F2020128223850316274
5•doener•8m ago•2 comments

MyFlames: Visualize MySQL query execution plans as interactive FlameGraphs

https://github.com/vgrippa/myflames
1•tanelpoder•9m ago•0 comments

Show HN: LLM of Babel

https://clairefro.github.io/llm-of-babel/
1•marjipan200•9m ago•0 comments

A modern iperf3 alternative with a live TUI, multi-client server, QUIC support

https://github.com/lance0/xfr
3•tanelpoder•10m ago•0 comments

Famfamfam Silk icons – also with CSS spritesheet

https://github.com/legacy-icons/famfamfam-silk
1•thunderbong•11m ago•0 comments

Apple is the only Big Tech company whose capex declined last quarter

https://sherwood.news/tech/apple-is-the-only-big-tech-company-whose-capex-declined-last-quarter/
2•elsewhen•14m ago•0 comments

Reverse-Engineering Raiders of the Lost Ark for the Atari 2600

https://github.com/joshuanwalker/Raiders2600
2•todsacerdoti•15m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Deterministic NDJSON audit logs – v1.2 update (structural gaps)

https://github.com/yupme-bot/kernel-ndjson-proofs
1•Slaine•19m ago•0 comments

The Greater Copenhagen Region could be your friend's next career move

https://www.greatercphregion.com/friend-recruiter-program
2•mooreds•19m ago•0 comments

Do Not Confirm – Fiction by OpenClaw

https://thedailymolt.substack.com/p/do-not-confirm
1•jamesjyu•20m ago•0 comments

The Analytical Profile of Peas

https://www.fossanalytics.com/en/news-articles/more-industries/the-analytical-profile-of-peas
1•mooreds•20m ago•0 comments

Hallucinations in GPT5 – Can models say "I don't know" (June 2025)

https://jobswithgpt.com/blog/llm-eval-hallucinations-t20-cricket/
1•sp1982•20m ago•0 comments

What AI is good for, according to developers

https://github.blog/ai-and-ml/generative-ai/what-ai-is-actually-good-for-according-to-developers/
1•mooreds•20m ago•0 comments

OpenAI might pivot to the "most addictive digital friend" or face extinction

https://twitter.com/lebed2045/status/2020184853271167186
1•lebed2045•22m ago•2 comments

Show HN: Know how your SaaS is doing in 30 seconds

https://anypanel.io
1•dasfelix•22m ago•0 comments

ClawdBot Ordered Me Lunch

https://nickalexander.org/drafts/auto-sandwich.html
3•nick007•23m ago•0 comments

What the News media thinks about your Indian stock investments

https://stocktrends.numerical.works/
1•mindaslab•24m ago•0 comments

Running Lua on a tiny console from 2001

https://ivie.codes/page/pokemon-mini-lua
1•Charmunk•25m ago•0 comments

Google and Microsoft Paying Creators $500K+ to Promote AI Tools

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/06/google-microsoft-pay-creators-500000-and-more-to-promote-ai.html
3•belter•27m ago•0 comments

New filtration technology could be game-changer in removal of PFAS

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jan/23/pfas-forever-chemicals-filtration
1•PaulHoule•28m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I saw this cool navigation reveal, so I made a simple HTML+CSS version

https://github.com/Momciloo/fun-with-clip-path
2•momciloo•28m ago•0 comments

Kinda Surprised by Seadance2's Moderation

https://seedanceai.me/
1•ri-vai•28m ago•2 comments

I Write Games in C (yes, C)

https://jonathanwhiting.com/writing/blog/games_in_c/
2•valyala•28m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Don't make Google sell Chrome

https://world.hey.com/dhh/don-t-make-google-sell-chrome-93cefbc6
18•Tomte•9mo ago

Comments

cruzcampo•9mo ago
DHH with the worst possible take, as is tradition.
jay_kyburz•9mo ago
Really, I agree with almost everything. It's crazy to force google to sell Chrome?

I assume they are also going to be somehow prevented from just forking it and creating a new browser?

Should just force them to sell the Advertising arm.

gibbitz•9mo ago
100% this a search engine selling ads on the web is more of an advantage than making a browser. It leads to market advantage due to deeper knowledge of properties than other engines get based on ad placement and passive access to authenticated pages. And it's monetized. The browser isn't.
cruzcampo•9mo ago
The browser is what allowed them to kill effective adblocking with Manifest V3.

Both the ad business and the browser should be split off. Google should really be dozens of businesses.

beardyw•9mo ago
> The browser is what allowed them to kill effective adblocking with Manifest V3.

There are loads of browsers which block ads without extensions. Use one of those. Or is it that you like the golden eggs but want to kill the goose anyway.

cruzcampo•9mo ago
I use Zen Browser.

Nonetheless, the market dominance of Chrome means that the ad blocking industry has been negatively impacted by their monopolist behavior.

jay_kyburz•9mo ago
I've been using chrome with ublock lite on my linux laptop where Firefox is really slow, and I've not seen any difference. I know the advanced features are missing, but most of the ads are still gone.
JohnFen•9mo ago
> There are loads of browsers which block ads without extensions.

But few (none?) that do it well enough for my comfort.

dfabulich•9mo ago
We're about to see the funding for all four major web browsers collapse before our eyes.

As of today, the only way to make money developing a web browser is to accept payment from a search engine.

That's how Firefox makes 95% of its revenue. That's also how Safari makes all of its money; the Safari team's dev budget is ~$14B, almost exactly the same as the amount Google pays Apple to be the primary search engine. Edge is a fork of Chrome that only exists to make Bing its primary search engine.

If Google is forced to divest Chrome and is no longer able to do those search-engine deals, 95% of the funding for all four web browsers will just go away.

Firefox will die immediately. And whoever bought Chrome would have no way to make money from it.

It's gonna be real, real bad out there.

Am4TIfIsER0ppos•9mo ago
Good. I hope mozilla does die. I hope chrome, safari, and edge all die. I hate mozilla for steadily ruining firefox over the past 15 years and I hate chrome for being the cause.
gorjusborg•9mo ago
My first reaction to this was horror. Then I remembered what life was like before 'the internet / world wide web' and thought that it might actually be beneficial to revert.

One thing is for sure, it would make things unstable in the near term.

tiffanyh•9mo ago
I don’t think enough people grasp this point.

Google is the only major tech company who wants an Open Web.

Meta (FB, IG, WA), Apple (App Store), etc would love a world where it is just a walled garden.

mvid•9mo ago
Well that’s a farce. Google wants an “open web” as long as the definition for “open” doesn’t infringe in any way on their data collection. If they could redefine SSL to give them access, they would
fouc•9mo ago
What's with the assumption that web browsers need funding? That web browsers need active development beyond what most open source development does?
latexr•9mo ago
> First, Chrome won the browser war fair and square by building a better surfboard for the internet.

Ah, yes, because as we all know, tech illiterate users (i.e. the majority) care deeply about which web browser they’re running, and after rigorous testing settled on Chrome. It had nothing to do with Google pushing Chrome on users every chance they got, using every trick in the book to get everyone to install their browser and degrading their popular services on alternative browsers. No sire, no foul play and trickery there, Google played fair and square. No one has ever known Google to be more than a fair and honest champion for users. What was their motto again? “Don’t be evil”? Well, I’m sure it doesn’t mean anything that they stopped using that.

To not fall victim to Poe’s law: Yes, that was heavy sarcasm.

EbNar•9mo ago
I don't agree. Firefox once had almost 30% market share. A lot of people explicitly downloaded and installed it, when IE was dominant and Linux almost non-existent. What happened? Those people suddenly became stupid or tech illiterate? Take into account that or has lost not only in market share, but also in absolute number of users. Mozilla has its fair share of blame here.
dismalaf•9mo ago
Edge literally makes itself the default on updates, yet Chrome is more popular.

Oh, the #1 query on Bing is "Google".

tiffanyh•9mo ago
> “Chrome won the browser war fair and square by building a better surfboard for the internet”

I’m a bit surprised by DHH take on this.

Maybe a lot of people have forgotten but how Chrome won the browser war was by Google annoying its users with a barrage of popups saying “to have a better viewing experience, download Chrome”.

The only way to have those messages go away from any Google property was to use Chrome.

reginald78•9mo ago
Don't forget bundling it with the installers of popular downloads like Adobe Flash Player, Adobe Reader, lots of antivirus software, etc. If you weren't paying attention during all of those installers you'd end up with Chrome installed.

I often wonder how necessary these moves even were though. Google's brand was at an all time high during this era.

techpineapple•9mo ago
I have a question, which is why not have google spin off their ad division? It's the thing that's a monopoly right? All the other products could either survive on their own, or be customers of the new company.