frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

They were drawn to Korea with dreams of K-pop stardom – but then let down

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgnq9rwyqno
1•breve•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI-Powered Merchant Intelligence

https://nodee.co
1•jjkirsch•3m ago•0 comments

Bash parallel tasks and error handling

https://github.com/themattrix/bash-concurrent
1•pastage•3m ago•0 comments

Let's compile Quake like it's 1997

https://fabiensanglard.net/compile_like_1997/index.html
1•billiob•4m ago•0 comments

Reverse Engineering Medium.com's Editor: How Copy, Paste, and Images Work

https://app.writtte.com/read/gP0H6W5
1•birdculture•10m ago•0 comments

Go 1.22, SQLite, and Next.js: The "Boring" Back End

https://mohammedeabdelaziz.github.io/articles/go-next-pt-2
1•mohammede•15m ago•0 comments

Laibach the Whistleblowers [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Mx2mxpaCY
1•KnuthIsGod•17m ago•1 comments

Slop News - HN front page right now hallucinated as 100% AI SLOP

https://slop-news.pages.dev/slop-news
1•keepamovin•21m ago•1 comments

Economists vs. Technologists on AI

https://ideasindevelopment.substack.com/p/economists-vs-technologists-on-ai
1•econlmics•23m ago•0 comments

Life at the Edge

https://asadk.com/p/edge
2•tosh•29m ago•0 comments

RISC-V Vector Primer

https://github.com/simplex-micro/riscv-vector-primer/blob/main/index.md
3•oxxoxoxooo•33m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Invoxo – Invoicing with automatic EU VAT for cross-border services

2•InvoxoEU•33m ago•0 comments

A Tale of Two Standards, POSIX and Win32 (2005)

https://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2.html
2•goranmoomin•37m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Is the Downfall of SaaS Started?

3•throwaw12•38m ago•0 comments

Flirt: The Native Backend

https://blog.buenzli.dev/flirt-native-backend/
2•senekor•40m ago•0 comments

OpenAI's Latest Platform Targets Enterprise Customers

https://aibusiness.com/agentic-ai/openai-s-latest-platform-targets-enterprise-customers
1•myk-e•43m ago•0 comments

Goldman Sachs taps Anthropic's Claude to automate accounting, compliance roles

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/06/anthropic-goldman-sachs-ai-model-accounting.html
3•myk-e•45m ago•5 comments

Ai.com bought by Crypto.com founder for $70M in biggest-ever website name deal

https://www.ft.com/content/83488628-8dfd-4060-a7b0-71b1bb012785
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•46m ago•1 comments

Big Tech's AI Push Is Costing More Than the Moon Landing

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-spending-tech-companies-compared-02b90046
4•1vuio0pswjnm7•48m ago•0 comments

The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/02/07/ai-spending-economy-shortages/
2•1vuio0pswjnm7•50m ago•0 comments

Suno, AI Music, and the Bad Future [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8dcFhF0Dlk
1•askl•52m ago•2 comments

Ask HN: How are researchers using AlphaFold in 2026?

1•jocho12•54m ago•0 comments

Running the "Reflections on Trusting Trust" Compiler

https://spawn-queue.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3786614
1•devooops•59m ago•0 comments

Watermark API – $0.01/image, 10x cheaper than Cloudinary

https://api-production-caa8.up.railway.app/docs
1•lembergs•1h ago•1 comments

Now send your marketing campaigns directly from ChatGPT

https://www.mail-o-mail.com/
1•avallark•1h ago•1 comments

Queueing Theory v2: DORA metrics, queue-of-queues, chi-alpha-beta-sigma notation

https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/queueing-theory
1•jph•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Hibana – choreography-first protocol safety for Rust

https://hibanaworks.dev/
5•o8vm•1h ago•1 comments

Haniri: A live autonomous world where AI agents survive or collapse

https://www.haniri.com
1•donangrey•1h ago•1 comments

GPT-5.3-Codex System Card [pdf]

https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/23eca107-a9b1-4d2c-b156-7deb4fbc697c/GPT-5-3-Codex-System-Card-02.pdf
1•tosh•1h ago•0 comments

Atlas: Manage your database schema as code

https://github.com/ariga/atlas
1•quectophoton•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Amazon Doesn't Want You to Know How Much the Trade War Costs

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2025-04-29/amazon-should-show-tariff-price-increases-despite-trump-bezos-call
46•petethomas•9mo ago

Comments

gnabgib•9mo ago
Title: Amazon Doesn’t Want You to Know How Much the Trade War Costs
inverted_flag•9mo ago
The Trump team doesn’t seem to understand the severity of what they’ve done to the economy. Shipping volume is cratering and warehouses are being depleted. People are going to notice the upcoming price hikes and shortages no matter how the numbers are shuffled around on the purchase order.
actionfromafar•9mo ago
But it will get better later you see. You just have to believe harder.
malfist•9mo ago
Just like one more tax cut for the rich and they'll be satisfied and create a swath of well paying middle class jobs for the rest of us.
HenryBemis•9mo ago
Heh, I think I get your sarcasm. The problem with "later" is that we got 1 life to live, and if "later" means that I've gotta wait 10 years, sorry-not-gonna-wait.

As for harder.. nah.. we got history books telling us how these things play out (not well).

Henchman21•9mo ago
They understand. They are meeting their goals. Their goal isn’t the continued stability of the USA.
allears•9mo ago
Oh it's a lot worse than that. Breaking decades-long international agreements unilaterally, and with insults and threats, means that any future trust and credibility has been destroyed. So even when the orange man is gone, it'll take many years to rebuild those relationships if ever.
Waterluvian•9mo ago
Long term I think this may be good for the 95% of us non-Americans. It’s forcing us out of a cozy minima, building new supply chains and trading partners. All while everyone is eager to find someone else to buy and sell to, which makes it easier. Maybe it’ll be a net positive for the world as long as he doesn’t destroy the world in the process.

In a way this represents a redistribution of wealth away from the rich, which is what I think a lot of people want (though maybe they’d wish it wasn’t away from them)

dh2022•9mo ago
I do not get how this is a redistribution of wealth away from the rich (rich spend a very small percentage of their income, middle class and poor people spend almost all of their income on necessities and maybe a bit of fun, so at the end of the day rich will come ahead)
EasyMark•9mo ago
This does none of that. The rich will only get richer, that is the trajectory, until there is a civil war. In the meantime this is only going to hurt the middle class on down and they will finally come to realize their orange "benefactor" is actually a stooge for powers much smarter than him who want to see the USA and democracy utterly fail.
MattPalmer1086•9mo ago
They're talking about non-Americans. The rest of the world. We are all looking for new trading partners now.

It will surely hurt Americans.

s1artibartfast•9mo ago
It's hard to destroy international trade without destroying international trade in the process.
mitchbob•9mo ago
https://archive.ph/ye77C
techpineapple•9mo ago
What exactly happened here, I mean, Amazon did something they knew would upset Trump, Trump got upset and Amazon backpedaled? Is the goal to let Trump feel like he got a win?
behringer•9mo ago
He's so easily manipulated.
inverted_flag•9mo ago
I don’t think it was manipulation. I think Amazon upper management genuinely planned to go through with it until Trump got wind, yelled at Bezos, and then Bezos told them to stop.
christhecaribou•9mo ago
I find it so hilarious that Andy Jassy is never mentioned when discussing Amazon leadership.
cshimmin•9mo ago
Oof, wow. I'm very much in the tech space and I literally had never heard his name before your post.
deepsun•9mo ago
The goal for Amazon is to appear good to public.
kevin_thibedeau•9mo ago
I wish they threw their own BS back in their face and demanded an explanation why the GOP no longer believes in a low regulation, pro-business government.

Why should the federal government have the power to mandate business processes that reduce transparency? They don't want income taxes automatically filed so we can see what the government is "stealing" from the public. Can't have a VAT because that's hidden. But import taxes have to be hidden?

kalleboo•9mo ago
Republicans have long been opposed to showing prices with sales tax built in (like in many other countries) because they want people to be conscious of how much they are paying in tax.

But for tariffs? No no we can't let people see THOSE!

The hypocrisy is outstanding.

christhecaribou•9mo ago
Listing the impact of tariffs on product prices is some of the strongest customer obsession the retail side of Amazon has shown in years. Shame to see Trump sabotage it.
mingus88•9mo ago
You’ll see it in the wild soon enough. This is going to hurt business everywhere and owners aren’t going to just go broke without making noise
firesteelrain•9mo ago
Put aside the politics

It’s a terrible metric to show because it’s not like they are buying these things in single pieces - they get the products in bulk from Chinese suppliers presumably at a discount. I am not sure of the point of including this - it is sort of like when you go to a restaurant and they add some stupid service charge on your bill as a protest against something like paying their workers more because wage went up

kasey_junk•9mo ago
You don’t get discounts on tariffs for bulk buying.
timr•9mo ago
Huge buyers can and do negotiate discounts to place the burden on the seller. If you're buying 1 item, the tariff is your problem. If you're buying 99% of the company's output, the tariff is their problem.
kasey_junk•9mo ago
And yet they still charge the same sales tax %.
timr•9mo ago
Sales taxes are calculated on the gross, not the COGS, so it's not the same. It's also different by locality.

But yes, the same principle applies: huge retailers negotiate for better margin. Any tax on the retailer can be theoretically negotiated back to the seller.

nickff•9mo ago
I think the parent is trying to say that the tariffs are levied based on the importer's cost, not on their price, so its impact could be smaller on goods with higher retail markup.
trealira•9mo ago
So a news site had some report that indicated that Amazon was considering displaying the cost of the tariffs next to the prices on their website. Trump responds to it as though it were fact. The headlines imply it's fact and not just a rumor. Now after Amazon representatives correct the record, saying that it was never approved, and journalists like this opinion writer act as though Bezos is changing his mind because Trump asked him to, and not because it likely wasn't going to happen in the first place. It's like they don't care about what actually happened, rather just about the story being compelling.
christhecaribou•9mo ago
What actually happened? You speak with such authority, how do you know what “actually happened”?

For all we know, this actually was planned by Amazon and Bezos did intervene to change their mind.

trealira•9mo ago
Try to find original articles saying Amazon actually decided this. At most you find some random websites saying there are internal reports within Amazon saying they'd display the tariffs. And then more recent ones say an Amazon representative said it was never approved and not going to happen.
password4321•9mo ago
This sounds like an opportunity for a browser extension. Honey + tariff estimate = installed by everyone!
mingus88•9mo ago
Keepa will show you the price history. That’s all people care about any way. It cost $5 six months ago and now it’s $10

One way or another, prices are going up. Your dollar doesn’t go as far. Trump can say whatever he wants about fair deals and fake news but the reality is inescapable for us

legitster•9mo ago
Amazon's whole shtick is that people will pay more for free shipping. It would not make sense for them to suddenly flip on one of their core principles.
marcus_holmes•9mo ago
Well at least they seem to be aware that tariffs raise prices now.
ChrisArchitect•9mo ago
More discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43831027

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43832588