Because that is certainly news to me and is extremely counterintuitive, considering that the whole idea behind those other things is that they are infused with mystical spirits whereas even the makers of ChatGPT don’t suggest that.
Alternatively instead of mysticism, it may be the belief in the technology being scientifically accurate that including in its ability to scientifically accurately predict the future that may be driving this decision making.
If the latter that raises many questions around us technologists who are working on or with these technologies to do a better job of explaining to the users what the limitations of these technologies are.
These people are going to exist with or without chatgpt. Maybe we should adjust the instruction training to tell people that you can't make worldly predictions from the arrangement of coffee grounds in a cup, other than the quality of the coffee machine and filters, no matter how creative and fantasy-like the users want the model to be.
Some humans are insanely stupid and have no self awareness, they were gonna loose with or without AI. At some point it's natural selection at work.
We can't halt technology progress just because some people are stupid.
Some technologies are allowed to grow because they lower the chance of self violation , but yes, most technology goes back into the lamp.
We don't need nuclear energy to kill ourselves. Over one million people die in car accidents per year worldwide, that's two per minute, and if we still haven't banned cars by now then sure as hell we're not gonna ban LLMs.
[0]: https://twitter.com/colin_fraser/status/1916994188035690904
[1]: https://twitter.com/AISafetyMemes/status/1916889492172013989
ChatGPT is not to blame, they could have gone to a coffee-grounds (human) reader and done the same. If someone can show that human coffee-grounds readers are better than ChatGPT, then there might be a case.
The weird thing is I looked at the posting history of that commenter and it was bland tech comments with no obvious signs of mental health issues.
Which.. sounds like she was either just looking for any excuse to divorce, or she was already divorced, from reality.
There is no story here about ChatGPT, this could have been anything. It could have been the way a dog barked, or hidden messages in the radio, which we wouldn't associate with dogs or radio.
If we are going to attempt any deeper analysis from this, it should be an analysis of what services are in place for people with mental health issues and how people can be empowered to notice signs to help their loved ones.
I'm already there personally, it just looks like a rip off
Serious relationship crusher: one person sitting on tiktok/reels all day and setting expectations for their own relationship based on that (often staged) content. Really not healthy to constantly have that level of pressure on your head.
There were societally beneficial reasons that divorce used to be hard to achieve, and the fickleness of the inconstant moon was one of them, to reference Juliet.
Otherwise, does a divorce really need anything more than one party willing to get out of the relationship ?
Even assuming anyone is calling it quits on frivolous grounds, it also means that's how much emotional investment there was left in the first place and they were due for a break any day really.
I don't know anything about Greek statutes specifically, but no-fault divorce has actually been a relatively recent development in most legal jurisdictions.
https://www.nomikosodigos.info/en/articles/902-mutual-consen...
So now, that third Popper world which was frozen unequivalently at some past time - since then * IT * will self-repeat and decide about us ?
BTW Why it's flagged ?? - so now, it happen ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43860410 - engine mix references instead of transcluding - with other level, authors referring to self only with a name of invention doing exactly what it was designed to rescue from ?? - 85 upvotes, happy). The next ?
croes•9h ago
People blindly belueving a machine
foxyv•7h ago
giraffe_lady•7h ago
foxyv•5h ago
John Lang did a little video about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfD_2fVqEMk
potato3732842•2h ago
ashoeafoot•6h ago
archerx•6h ago
imtringued•5h ago
gwern summarizes it appropriately: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14867898
dragonwriter•5h ago
The key claims about the film that gwern's argument builds on are false, though. E.g.: "in a setting where there are no genuine consequences to any of this, no genetic engineering, no embryo selection"
It is a rather central part of the story that genetic engineering and embryo selection are routine, and the principal protagonist is noteworthy because his parents did not use such techniques, and he was instead a "faith baby".
gwern is clearly criticizing something, but it's not what is actually portrayed in the film Gattaca.
gwern•18m ago
(My headcanon is that the esoteric story of _Gattaca_ is that none of the supposed embryo selection or valid/invalid screens exist at all, any embryo selection is just ordinary IVF quality control for aneuploidy etc, there is only cheap universal sequencing developed by a totalitarian police state like the CCP (see: Zero COVID testing), and the classification exists to manufacture distinctions and divide families and punish/reward elite supporters; the Freemans were some lower 'wavering' class, grouped with religious minorities, as indicated by their dissenting 'natural' birth, and so they earned a valid vs invalid split within their family. It makes more sense than the actual story, anyway.)
* I've remarked elsewhere that _Gattaca_ is an example of how movies with a message tend to fail by loading the dice too heavily for one side, removing any 'moral dilemma', and it is no exception: we never see any evidence that Vincent is doing anything wrong or that he shouldn't go on the space mission. In fact, given his methodical penetration, high competency, motivation, and extraordinary success at getting into the mission, he shows that he should be selected for his moxie and chutzpah. So what _Gattaca_ should have done was to make the ending Vincent suddenly clutching his heart from the shock, and fade to black.
netsharc•3h ago
ty6853•6h ago
graemep•6h ago
> According to reports, the woman asked ChatGPT to interpret the coffee grounds left in her cup — in a lighthearted attempt to mimic traditional fortune-telling
This could just has easily happened with a human fortune teller.
kees99•6h ago
Same as with fortune cookie quips, any "prediction" will be something that sounds deep and intriguing, but always vague enough to be non-falsifiable.
Otherwise, client will come back and confront fortune teller about it. And human one knows it well enough to avoid making an unnecessary headache for themselves.
rpdillon•5h ago
> He also noted that this wasn’t the first time she had fallen into irrational beliefs. He claimed that in the past, his wife had visited an astrologer, and it took her a year to accept that nothing they said came true.
I don't think the problem here is with AI.
croes•5h ago
amanaplanacanal•4h ago
croes•4h ago
croes•5h ago