frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

OpenUI: Open Standard for Generative UI

https://www.openui.com
1•handfuloflight•1m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Why an MCP server instead of agents.txt?

1•playorizaya•2m ago•0 comments

The delicious irony of Anthropic bemoaning distillation

https://twitter.com/ejzim/status/2072692694036660517
1•MrBuddyCasino•6m ago•0 comments

Lotus: Optimized Agentic and LLM Bulk Processing

https://github.com/lotus-data/lotus
1•handfuloflight•15m ago•0 comments

The end of paper retirement processing at the Office of Personnel Management

https://twitter.com/spikebrehm/status/2072422555101561154
2•MrBuddyCasino•21m ago•0 comments

Hackers On Planet Earth is back in Manhattan next month

https://www.hope.net/
1•fashiontechguru•24m ago•1 comments

GPT-5.5-Cyber built a zlib fuzzing lab in a day

https://blog.trailofbits.com/2026/07/02/field-reports-from-patch-the-planet/
1•wslh•25m ago•0 comments

Don't Train the Model, Evolve the Harness

https://huggingface.co/spaces/joelniklaus/harness-optimization
1•emersonmacro•27m ago•0 comments

Automated Accounting, Financial Reporting and Tax Management

https://maxint.com/blog/maxint-2-24-release
1•pcvetkovski•31m ago•0 comments

Trump's Windfall Has Few Known Global Precedents

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/02/world/europe/trump-world-leaders-corruption-wealth.html
2•Alien1Being•33m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Once you make your money from vibe coding innumerable products, then?

1•keepamovin•38m ago•0 comments

Private Credit Keeps $14B Trapped in Bid to Outlast Storm

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-07-02/private-credit-keeps-14-billion-trapped-in-bid...
1•petethomas•39m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How do you get your open-source product good traction?

1•akarshhegde18•39m ago•1 comments

Blue Owl hit by $4.7B of redemption requests as investor exodus persists

https://www.ft.com/content/b302a86d-f6eb-4d47-b90b-523c1c19b3fa
1•petethomas•39m ago•0 comments

'Humanity is a privilege': Umar Khalid on his six years in a jail without trial

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jun/30/umar-khalid-interview-six-years-indian-jail-without...
2•thunderbong•40m ago•1 comments

Using precision editing to study human embryo development shows master gene

https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/first-use-of-precision-editing-to-study-human-embryo-developm...
2•gmays•46m ago•0 comments

Open letter to Anthropic: keep Claude Fable 5 in existing paid plans

https://keepfable.org
2•SpitSalute•49m ago•1 comments

FlickerScope – are your LEDs giving you a headache? stop guessing

https://github.com/snokamedia/flickerscope
1•snoka•53m ago•0 comments

Wikipedia Is Up (2001)

https://web.archive.org/web/20010506042824/www.nupedia.com/pipermail/nupedia-l/2001-January/00068...
2•downbad_•55m ago•0 comments

A few thought about snarky answers on StackOverflow (2019)

https://www.cargocultcode.com/solving-the-zalgo-regex/
1•downbad_•55m ago•0 comments

Tradeoffs in Complexity, Abstraction, and Generality

https://www.lesswrong.com/s/EL2YvcrPNHrGgzPnZ/p/HNJwteaxpRYfLaQt7
1•parksb•56m ago•0 comments

Google's exponential path to climate-wrecking digital bloat

https://ketanjoshi.co/2026/07/01/googles-exponential-path-to-climate-wrecking-digital-bloat/
2•colinprince•58m ago•2 comments

Why AI Is Collapsing: How China Is Winning. [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXJf7vL8k94
1•Bender•59m ago•1 comments

Thanks but No Thanks

https://twitter.com/xopzuey/status/2072838561275969717
2•znort_•1h ago•2 comments

How Many People Have Ever Lived in the United States?

https://danielfetz.io/p/how-many-people-have-ever-lived-in-the-united-states
1•paulpauper•1h ago•0 comments

AI is 'not smart' so what's next in artificial intelligence?

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj6gr0xkyr3o
3•1vuio0pswjnm7•1h ago•0 comments

Core dump epidemiology: fixing an 18-year-old bug

https://openai.com/index/core-dump-epidemiology-data-infrastructure-bug/
2•stopachka•1h ago•0 comments

I vibe coded a programming language, but I'd rather learn C the old way

1•alonsovm44•1h ago•0 comments

Some Basic LLM Etiquette

https://steenbok.space/blog/ai-etiquette/
1•sporkl_l•1h ago•0 comments

How AI Became More Expensive Than the Workers It Replaced [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfaZZPjA3g0
2•Bender•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: LLM is useless without explicit prompt

4•revskill•1y ago
After months playing with LLM models, here's my observation:

- LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

- LLM failed to correct itself. If it generated bullshits, it's an inifinite loop of generating more bullshits.

The question is, without explicit prompt, could LLM leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code without me instruct it at least ?

Comments

ben_w•1y ago
Your expectations are way too high.

> - LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

You can say the same about every dev I've worked with, including myself. This is literally why humans have meetings rather than all of us diving in to whatever we're self-motivated to do.

What does differ is time-scales of the feedback loop with the management:

Humans meetings are daily to weekly.

According to recent research*, the state-of-the-art models are only 50% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert an hour, or 80% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert 10 minutes.

Even if the currently observed trend of increasing time horizons holds, we're 21 months from having an AI where every other daily standup is "ugh, no, you got it wrong", and just over 5 years from them being able to manage a 2-week sprint with an 80% chance of success (in the absence of continuous feedback).

Even that isn't really enough for them to properly "leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code", as archiecture and maintainability are longer horizon tasks than 2-week sprints.

* https://youtu.be/evSFeqTZdqs?si=QIzIjB6hotJ0FgHm

revskill•1y ago
It's not as high as you think.

LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

ben_w•1y ago
Given your expectation:

> It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

And your observation:

> LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

QED, *your expectations* are way too high.

They can't do that yet.