frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Layanan Nomor Halo BCA 0813 707 1535

1•shaileshlangi•45s ago•0 comments

CS BCA Hubungi Halo BCA 0813 707 1535

1•shaileshlangi•1m ago•0 comments

In Seattle, juggling two or more jobs isn't just for low-wage workers

https://www.seattletimes.com/business/in-seattle-juggling-two-or-more-jobs-isnt-just-for-low-wage...
1•dangle1•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Gigs.Quest – Real-time freelancer marketplace with per-second billing

https://gigs.quest/
1•ufvy•5m ago•1 comments

Layanan Bank BCA 0813 707 1535

1•cracksdaddy•6m ago•0 comments

Nomor WhatsApp BCA 0813 707 1535

1•cracksdaddy•6m ago•0 comments

Layanan Buka Blokir BCA 24jam

1•cracksdaddy•7m ago•0 comments

SDL Sopwith is a port of the classic biplane shoot 'em-up "Sopwith"

https://fragglet.github.io/sdl-sopwith/
1•mooreds•10m ago•0 comments

What happens to Application layer in the age of Operating System AI reply bots?

https://twitter.com/nowflux_/status/1992347485826662693
1•nowflux•11m ago•0 comments

Europe joins US as exascale superpower after Jupiter clinches Top500 run

https://www.theregister.com/2025/11/17/europe_jupiter_supercomputer/
1•PaulHoule•11m ago•0 comments

This Lying Has to Stop: Keeping AI Honest with OpenTelemetry [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48_v7VNZCzk
1•mooreds•11m ago•0 comments

How Consolidation Is Eroding Internet Resilience

https://pulse.internetsociety.org/blog/how-consolidation-is-eroding-internet-resilience
1•speckx•12m ago•0 comments

Could Terahertz Radar in Cars Save Lives?

https://spectrum.ieee.org/terahertz-radar
1•geox•15m ago•0 comments

Evaluating the Effectiveness of LLM-Evaluators (a.k.a. LLM-as-Judge)

https://eugeneyan.com/writing/llm-evaluators/
1•jxmorris12•15m ago•0 comments

A century of utopian experiments and the fall of Llano del Rio

https://kubicki.org/letters/the-dogs-of-llano-del-rio-ii/
2•durakot•17m ago•0 comments

Flux Keyboard

https://fluxkeyboard.com/?v=0b3b97fa6688
3•weinzierl•18m ago•0 comments

The Pathway to AGI Isn't Intelligence, It's Shared Cognition

https://blog.reframetech.com/the-pathway-to-agi-isnt-intelligence-its-shared-cognition
3•seikenberry•22m ago•1 comments

Typst

https://github.com/qjcg/awesome-typst
2•kekqqq•22m ago•2 comments

C++ HDL (Hardware Description Language)

https://github.com/mirekez/cpphdl
1•olvy0•25m ago•0 comments

Open Source Sustainability – My Journey

https://www.dlvhdr.me/posts/support-oss
1•dlvhdr•26m ago•0 comments

780k Windows Users Downloaded Linux Distro Zorin OS in the Last 5 Weeks

https://blog.zorin.com/2025/11/18/test-the-upgrade-from-zorin-os-17-to-18-and-celebrating-1-milli...
5•m463•29m ago•2 comments

Cloud cost analyzer – analyze, detect anomalies, nd chat with your cloud bill

https://cloud-cost.vgnsh.xyz/
1•eigen-vector•30m ago•1 comments

Could High-Speed Trains Shorten US Travel Times While Reducing Emissions?

https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2025/11/travel/us-high-speed-rail-reimagined-vis/
2•m463•35m ago•1 comments

Feeding Colorado

https://feedingcolorado.org/
2•mooreds•36m ago•0 comments

AI is coming for the world of competitive Excel

https://thehustle.co/originals/ai-is-coming-for-the-world-of-competitive-excel
2•Anon84•40m ago•0 comments

Where Are the Builders?

https://near.blog/where-are-the-builders/
2•0x79de•40m ago•0 comments

Reflexio, a retry library with backoff strategies on per-error-class basis

https://github.com/aponysus/reflexio
1•aponysus•43m ago•1 comments

The Strange and Totally Real Plan to Blot Out the Sun

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/11/21/stardust-geoengineering-janos-pasztor-regulatio...
1•domofutu•44m ago•0 comments

Politicians Need to Understand This Computer Science Concept Better (2016)

https://nautil.us/politicians-need-to-understand-this-computer-science-concept-better-236046/
2•furcyd•45m ago•0 comments

Seeking Founding Engineer (CTO Track) – Secure Digital Communications – UK Only

1•ProductMngrUK•47m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: LLM is useless without explicit prompt

4•revskill•6mo ago
After months playing with LLM models, here's my observation:

- LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

- LLM failed to correct itself. If it generated bullshits, it's an inifinite loop of generating more bullshits.

The question is, without explicit prompt, could LLM leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code without me instruct it at least ?

Comments

ben_w•6mo ago
Your expectations are way too high.

> - LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

You can say the same about every dev I've worked with, including myself. This is literally why humans have meetings rather than all of us diving in to whatever we're self-motivated to do.

What does differ is time-scales of the feedback loop with the management:

Humans meetings are daily to weekly.

According to recent research*, the state-of-the-art models are only 50% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert an hour, or 80% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert 10 minutes.

Even if the currently observed trend of increasing time horizons holds, we're 21 months from having an AI where every other daily standup is "ugh, no, you got it wrong", and just over 5 years from them being able to manage a 2-week sprint with an 80% chance of success (in the absence of continuous feedback).

Even that isn't really enough for them to properly "leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code", as archiecture and maintainability are longer horizon tasks than 2-week sprints.

* https://youtu.be/evSFeqTZdqs?si=QIzIjB6hotJ0FgHm

revskill•6mo ago
It's not as high as you think.

LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

ben_w•6mo ago
Given your expectation:

> It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

And your observation:

> LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

QED, *your expectations* are way too high.

They can't do that yet.