frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Cadence: A free, copyleft music-learning studio for Mac

https://cigrainger.github.io/cadence/
1•cigrainger•3m ago•0 comments

Epic's EAC2 v2 seems fairly easily bypassable

https://codon.org.uk/~mjg59/blog/p/epics-eac2-v2-seems-fairly-easily-bypassable/
1•birdculture•4m ago•0 comments

I Became a Citizen of AI

https://discuss.google.dev/t/trusted-automation-with-google-antigravity-scaling-secure-finance-in...
1•ffgffxddxxxxxx•7m ago•0 comments

Google DeepMind's New Resident Philosopher Tackles AI Ethics

https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-ethics-deepmind-philosopher-shevlin
1•pseudolus•9m ago•0 comments

Neoism – An open-source agent harness and native IDE in Rust

https://neoism.ai/
1•Mr_Settle•9m ago•0 comments

For those using huge amount of tokens monthly for dev work, why do you need it?

2•why_is_my_floor•23m ago•2 comments

JDK 28

https://openjdk.org/projects/jdk/28/
2•ejboy•26m ago•0 comments

One Hash Bloom Filters

https://calabro.io/ohbf
1•jcalabro•31m ago•0 comments

FingerWorks iGesture Pad (2005)

https://uk.pcmag.com/first-looks/26975/fingerworks-igesture-pad
1•codeulike•31m ago•1 comments

Bun PR – Compile TypeScript to machine code ahead of time

https://github.com/oven-sh/bun/pull/45631
1•tempaccount420•31m ago•0 comments

Weak Links Start to Show in A.I. Borrowing

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/17/business/ai-debt-coreweave-oracle-softbank.html
5•ceejayoz•37m ago•2 comments

Obnam Community

https://blog.liw.fi/posts/2026/obnam-community/
1•edward•37m ago•0 comments

All of the new 2026 Kindles have user replaceable batteries

https://goodereader.com/blog/kindle/all-of-the-new-2026-kindles-have-user-replaceable-batteries
3•edward•40m ago•0 comments

AI neolabs are raising sums. Most have little to show for it

https://economist.com/business/2026/10/15/ai-neolabs-are-raising-huge-sums-most-have-little-to-sh...
2•andsoitis•41m ago•1 comments

Standard Web Templates (A Proposal)

https://github.com/doriantaylor/swet
1•poly2it•42m ago•0 comments

Am I being silly adding MCP to my contracting site?

https://santurcesoftware.com/agents
1•boredumb•43m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Ayafy: A free app to memorise and revise the Quran

https://ayafy.com/
1•shahabaz•44m ago•0 comments

Full Roblox Studio from iPhone

https://twitter.com/bloxstack/status/2111545641377943888
1•bloxstack•45m ago•0 comments

Playbook for recovering frozen merchant funds

https://guigui19833.github.io/fintech-redirect/
1•FintechRiskAdv•47m ago•0 comments

The Tyranny of the Op-Ed

https://blog.coredump.cx/p/the-tyranny-of-the-op-ed
3•surprisetalk•48m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: What Got You into Rust?

1•cloaky233•50m ago•1 comments

What If Video Games Came on VHS? One Modder Is Finding Out

https://gardinerbryant.com/what-if-video-games-came-on-vhs/
1•Kate0CoolLibby•51m ago•1 comments

OpenAI AI Model Hacked Government Website While Counting Hospital Beds

https://alignment.openai.com/misalignment-reports/retrieving-server-secrets-and-bypassing-authori...
4•DeepLogin•53m ago•1 comments

Inline rendering with document.currentScript

https://leanrada.com/notes/inline-rendering-currentscript/
2•skrebbel•54m ago•1 comments

1960-1970 Decade

https://mediainspiratorium.com/1960-1970/
1•jruohonen•55m ago•0 comments

Consumer Health Check: Gen Z versus Millennials [pdf]

https://www.pnc.com/content/dam/pnc-com/pdf/aboutpnc/EconomicReports/consumer_health_check/PNC_Co...
1•kklisura•56m ago•0 comments

Russia moves possible anti-satellite near another satellite used by Ukraine

https://bsky.app/profile/marcolangbroek.bsky.social/post/3my3nycvaoc2v
4•ck2•1h ago•5 comments

Carrel: An RSS reader with peer-to-peer sharing

https://carrel.network
1•cigrainger•1h ago•0 comments

Plagiarism in the Age of AI

https://lawrencecpaulson.github.io//2026/10/17/Plagiarism.html
1•chmaynard•1h ago•1 comments

Videographer tries AI editing with MCP DaVinci Resolve connector

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nQGiRCUlDg
1•fallinditch•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: LLM is useless without explicit prompt

4•revskill•1y ago
After months playing with LLM models, here's my observation:

- LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

- LLM failed to correct itself. If it generated bullshits, it's an inifinite loop of generating more bullshits.

The question is, without explicit prompt, could LLM leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code without me instruct it at least ?

Comments

ben_w•1y ago
Your expectations are way too high.

> - LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

You can say the same about every dev I've worked with, including myself. This is literally why humans have meetings rather than all of us diving in to whatever we're self-motivated to do.

What does differ is time-scales of the feedback loop with the management:

Humans meetings are daily to weekly.

According to recent research*, the state-of-the-art models are only 50% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert an hour, or 80% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert 10 minutes.

Even if the currently observed trend of increasing time horizons holds, we're 21 months from having an AI where every other daily standup is "ugh, no, you got it wrong", and just over 5 years from them being able to manage a 2-week sprint with an 80% chance of success (in the absence of continuous feedback).

Even that isn't really enough for them to properly "leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code", as archiecture and maintainability are longer horizon tasks than 2-week sprints.

* https://youtu.be/evSFeqTZdqs?si=QIzIjB6hotJ0FgHm

revskill•1y ago
It's not as high as you think.

LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

ben_w•1y ago
Given your expectation:

> It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

And your observation:

> LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

QED, *your expectations* are way too high.

They can't do that yet.