frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: MAVS-GC – An Open-Source Governance Architecture for AI Systems

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h7qpDgLv2PyIB6ZlLED5qGDeUbnNbITzNEspmsxA7ZE/edit?usp=sharing
1•infernusreal•34s ago•0 comments

Best of AI is now open source

https://bestofai.io/journal/best-of-ai-is-now-open-source/
3•dariubs•2m ago•0 comments

The future of large files in Git is Git

https://gopeekapp.blogspot.com/2026/06/the-future-of-large-files-in-git-is-git.html
1•guptalog•3m ago•0 comments

Free-threaded Python: past, present, and future

https://lwn.net/Articles/1078367/
1•prakashqwerty•9m ago•1 comments

The US Army Issued Ocarinas to Soldiers in World War II

https://www.flutetunes.com/articles/my-flute-goes-to-war/
2•tomcam•9m ago•0 comments

Domino Tiling: From Dynamic Programming to Finite Fields

https://www.omegasyntax.com/domino/
1•vbrhjajcn•13m ago•0 comments

632nm Podcast: John Bowers – Silicon Photonics and the Future of AI Scaling [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjQ3Yorw-Ps
1•wwarner•16m ago•0 comments

Kids Act Would Require Age Checks to Get Online

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/kids-act-would-require-age-checks-get-online
1•mdp2021•19m ago•1 comments

Bluetooth T9 keyboard for smartphones (and other things)

https://jrainimo.com/build/2026/05/t9/
2•rcarmo•19m ago•0 comments

Chasing Fable – An illustrated engineering tale

https://adapt.com/blog/chasing-fable
1•ashumz•26m ago•0 comments

Every match of the 2026 World Cup as a generative poster

https://matchprint.info/
3•coinfused•27m ago•1 comments

Conductor Cloud

https://www.conductor.build/docs/cloud-beta
1•sklinkert•29m ago•0 comments

One-two punch delivered in global operation disrupts cybercrime "assembly line"

https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/06/one-two-punch-delivered-in-global-operation-disrupts-cyb...
1•joozio•30m ago•0 comments

LLM Refusal Behavior on Open-Weight Model

https://zentara.co/blog/llm-refusal-behavior/
1•tvalentius•31m ago•0 comments

Wikipedia Workers in Britain set global first by seeking union recognition

https://utaw.tech/news/wikipedia-recognition
3•chobeat•32m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Optimal Journaling Book Choice?

1•herodoturtle•37m ago•0 comments

DRAM Price Fixing Scandal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRAM_price_fixing_scandal
5•kamranjon•45m ago•0 comments

With crossplanes, Helm is all you need

https://medium.com/zencity-engineering/now-the-infrastructure-is-boring-too-and-thats-still-a-com...
1•alonisser•47m ago•1 comments

Cogent France: « perform an orderly shutdown of your equipment »

https://www.mail-archive.com/frnog@frnog.org/msg80526.html
1•southerntofu•49m ago•0 comments

Did AI write this article?

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2026/06/16/did-ai-write-this-article
3•ijidak•55m ago•0 comments

Is AI Coming for Our Jobs?

https://jacobin.com/2026/02/ai-technology-productivity-growth-job-loss
2•one33seven•1h ago•0 comments

VSCode Blogs

https://code.visualstudio.com/blogs
2•saikatsg•1h ago•0 comments

The Tokenpocalypse:Companies Are Scrambling to Stop Spending So Much on AI

https://www.404media.co/the-tokenpocalypse-is-here-companies-are-scrambling-to-stop-spending-so-m...
2•Gedxx•1h ago•1 comments

Show HN:Another alternative against Codex Record and Replay

https://www.visualbuild.me
2•visualbuildme•1h ago•0 comments

Wikipedia advocacy shapes LLM values

https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.24890
2•50kIters•1h ago•0 comments

Make AI Boring Again

https://charitydotwtf.substack.com/p/make-ai-boring-again
3•BerislavLopac•1h ago•0 comments

Robert Schiller: This Doommaxxing Has Got to Stop

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/22/opinion/ai-doom-jobs-economy.html
2•benwen•1h ago•1 comments

Questions

https://forms.cloud.microsoft/r/PZDe3Z3Nzdhttps://forms.cloud.microsoft/r/PZDe3Z3Nzd
3•InjiChoe•1h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Japanese Language AI Tutor in 3D classroom

https://unihongo.com
3•trinhngocdieu•1h ago•0 comments

The Empty Field That Wasn't: GPS, OTAD and Two Decades of Encrypted Broadcasts

https://sjmurdoch.github.io/gps-special-messages/
1•fratellobigio•1h ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: LLM is useless without explicit prompt

4•revskill•1y ago
After months playing with LLM models, here's my observation:

- LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

- LLM failed to correct itself. If it generated bullshits, it's an inifinite loop of generating more bullshits.

The question is, without explicit prompt, could LLM leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code without me instruct it at least ?

Comments

ben_w•1y ago
Your expectations are way too high.

> - LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

You can say the same about every dev I've worked with, including myself. This is literally why humans have meetings rather than all of us diving in to whatever we're self-motivated to do.

What does differ is time-scales of the feedback loop with the management:

Humans meetings are daily to weekly.

According to recent research*, the state-of-the-art models are only 50% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert an hour, or 80% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert 10 minutes.

Even if the currently observed trend of increasing time horizons holds, we're 21 months from having an AI where every other daily standup is "ugh, no, you got it wrong", and just over 5 years from them being able to manage a 2-week sprint with an 80% chance of success (in the absence of continuous feedback).

Even that isn't really enough for them to properly "leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code", as archiecture and maintainability are longer horizon tasks than 2-week sprints.

* https://youtu.be/evSFeqTZdqs?si=QIzIjB6hotJ0FgHm

revskill•1y ago
It's not as high as you think.

LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

ben_w•1y ago
Given your expectation:

> It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

And your observation:

> LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

QED, *your expectations* are way too high.

They can't do that yet.