frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

The smell of rain: how Aussie scientists invented a new word in 1964

https://www.csiro.au/en/news/All/Articles/2015/March/the-smell-of-rain-how-our-scientists-invente...
1•fanf2•1m ago•0 comments

Pasiv – a signed, honest crypto miner for the machine you own

https://pasiv.network/
1•screan•5m ago•0 comments

Bounded Agents: Delegation Security for Multi-Agent AI Systems

https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15888
2•xmuruaga•10m ago•0 comments

Google gives publishers a new way to fight AI-driven traffic losses

https://techcrunch.com/2026/08/20/google-gives-publishers-a-new-way-to-fight-ai-driven-traffic-lo...
2•jnord•16m ago•0 comments

We Changed Travel Forever

https://hotels.cooveb.com
1•sshinde•16m ago•1 comments

Scientists tracked kids for 8 years – the screen time result was unexpected

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/08/260815064803.htm
1•jnord•17m ago•0 comments

Emacs 31.1 will release on 8/24

https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/062dcd2aead00c3b47c14ff5b6c40313f7a775f5/etc/HISTORY
6•birdculture•23m ago•0 comments

Bulwark Gateway – fail-closed security proxy for LLM agents (self-hosted)

https://github.com/red-orbita/bulwark-gateway
1•rokitoh•25m ago•0 comments

Engaging with AI for serious maths research – Norman Wildberger

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7d2KMdVp9E
1•nyc111•25m ago•0 comments

The Defense-Tech Bubble Is Headed for Consolidation

https://fox-and-lion.vercel.app/analysis/the-defense-tech-bubble-is-headed-for-consolidation
4•bdjsmsm•29m ago•0 comments

SQLite plans can drastically differ with CTE and temp table

https://askrecall.dev/blog/44-minute-ci-job/
1•vira28•30m ago•0 comments

SQLite for Everything

https://joecode.com/2026-08-19-sqlite3/
1•mpweiher•30m ago•0 comments

Survival Guide for a Censored Internet

https://akitaonrails.com/en/2026/08/19/survival-guide-for-a-censored-internet/
1•g0xA52A2A•34m ago•0 comments

Compilation of Elon Musk promising self driving Tesla 'next year' for 10 years

https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughMuskSpam/s/ROk3lHIdqQ
3•fsuts•35m ago•1 comments

Inadvertent Context Leakage in Language Models

https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.19857
1•sbulaev•36m ago•0 comments

Voluntary attention regulates acute immune responses in humans

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-026-02541-1
1•morsch•39m ago•0 comments

America Inc has a tight grip on allied governments

https://www.economist.com/business/2026/08/16/america-inc-has-a-tight-grip-on-allied-governments
1•edward•40m ago•0 comments

Bitcoin's short squeeze traced to a Treasury bond buyback decision

https://davidebtc186.substack.com/p/bitcoin-just-had-its-biggest-squeeze
1•shadowbip•45m ago•0 comments

Only one type of lawyer will survive the AI wipeout

https://www.afr.com/work-and-careers/workplace/judges-may-be-the-only-survivors-of-law-s-ai-carna...
2•asdefghyk•47m ago•1 comments

Writing with AI Is Stupid

https://lambdaland.org/posts/2026-08-07-ai-writing-stupid/
4•frizlab•51m ago•3 comments

Better Batteries

https://matklad.github.io/2026/08/20/better-batteries.html
1•olexsmir•54m ago•0 comments

MOQ Video Streaming for Robots, Drones, and Embedded Devices

https://www.red5.net/blog/moq-video-streaming-for-robots-drones-and-embedded-devices/
1•mondainx•1h ago•0 comments

Claude Opus 4.6 returned nothing 900/900 times. Should agents retry?

https://zenodo.org/records/21696066
5•aiagenttester•1h ago•1 comments

Why to Start a Startup in a Bad Economy (2008)

https://paulgraham.com/badeconomy.html
1•tosh•1h ago•0 comments

Stop Clutching Your FPV Drones

https://foxandlion.pub/analysis/stop-clutching-your-fpv-drones
4•ewfeber•1h ago•0 comments

El Niño set to be 'strongest in living memory', says Met Office

https://www.bbc.co.uk/weather/articles/c3ekg93vjz9o
2•iamben•1h ago•0 comments

ISO 24495-1:2023 Plain language

https://www.iso.org/standard/78907.html
2•Bluestein•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Meg – I processed 259M nodes on my laptop using 6.91MB RAM

https://github.com/blueray313164-a11y/Quantum-Drive-Solver
1•blueray313164•1h ago•0 comments

See Through Walls with WiFi

https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView
2•chunkyslink•1h ago•1 comments

The Lost Treasure of Sid Meier's Pirates

https://remapradio.com/articles/the-lost-treasure-of-sid-meiers-pirates/
40•spankibalt•1h ago•10 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: LLM is useless without explicit prompt

4•revskill•1y ago
After months playing with LLM models, here's my observation:

- LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

- LLM failed to correct itself. If it generated bullshits, it's an inifinite loop of generating more bullshits.

The question is, without explicit prompt, could LLM leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code without me instruct it at least ?

Comments

ben_w•1y ago
Your expectations are way too high.

> - LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

You can say the same about every dev I've worked with, including myself. This is literally why humans have meetings rather than all of us diving in to whatever we're self-motivated to do.

What does differ is time-scales of the feedback loop with the management:

Humans meetings are daily to weekly.

According to recent research*, the state-of-the-art models are only 50% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert an hour, or 80% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert 10 minutes.

Even if the currently observed trend of increasing time horizons holds, we're 21 months from having an AI where every other daily standup is "ugh, no, you got it wrong", and just over 5 years from them being able to manage a 2-week sprint with an 80% chance of success (in the absence of continuous feedback).

Even that isn't really enough for them to properly "leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code", as archiecture and maintainability are longer horizon tasks than 2-week sprints.

* https://youtu.be/evSFeqTZdqs?si=QIzIjB6hotJ0FgHm

revskill•1y ago
It's not as high as you think.

LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

ben_w•1y ago
Given your expectation:

> It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

And your observation:

> LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

QED, *your expectations* are way too high.

They can't do that yet.