frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

What if we learned languages like we acquired our first?

1•Salim_wariz•2m ago•0 comments

Mathematics Without Mathematicians

https://borretti.me/article/mathematics-without-mathematicians
1•varjag•2m ago•0 comments

Include "Build.h"

https://includebuild.com/
1•rurban•15m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tone Generator

https://soundtonegenerator.com/
1•artiomyak•18m ago•0 comments

Should You Marry Her?

https://acotra.substack.com/p/should-you-marry-her
2•kqr•20m ago•0 comments

An old-new take on argument parsing in Rust

https://jmmv.dev/2026/07/hello-getoptsargs.html
2•birdculture•23m ago•0 comments

Police in the US are making their own true crime podcasts

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpw9q0ekd9eo
3•1659447091•25m ago•0 comments

Idle Murpg – Miracle Mu – Immortal Legends

https://idle-murpg.com
2•Kunstnebel•29m ago•0 comments

IBM i (OS/400) the Database Operating System

https://osadmins.com/en/ibm-i-os-400-the-database-operating-system/
2•naves•32m ago•0 comments

DeepSeek's Theory of the AI Gap

https://hellochinatech.com/p/deepseek-liang-wenfeng-transcript
2•sbmthakur•34m ago•0 comments

Towards Designing an Execution Control System with Metastability Resilience

http://muratbuffalo.blogspot.com/2026/08/towards-designing-execution-control.html
1•matt_d•34m ago•0 comments

AI labels to be compulsory on authentic-looking content under EU rules

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jul/31/ai-labels-to-be-compulsory-on-authentic-lookin...
4•tosh•36m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: How do you make people notice the cameras watching them?

1•bogomil•38m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Galda – Come back to Claude Code/Codex without digging through Git

https://galda.app/
1•masa1992•39m ago•0 comments

I don't recommend Tailwind CSS

https://en.andros.dev/blog/af3ee191/why-i-dont-recommend-tailwind-css/
4•andros•40m ago•0 comments

Australia's social media ban has failed

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/australia-defends-teen-social-media-ban-after-study-show...
11•BlueBerry2001•44m ago•4 comments

Show HN: An SDK to build apps for Kobo eReaders

https://github.com/BandarLabs/Cobalt
2•thepoet•45m ago•0 comments

MUD as AI Evaluation and LLM-judge distortion in ways aggregate κ misses

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/GPbWyHgx9hCLMdAjc/mud-as-ai-evaluation-and-llm-judge-distortion-i...
3•joozio•48m ago•0 comments

Agent4Lease

https://agent4lease.com/
2•vytasta•50m ago•0 comments

CRM: An open-source, agentic-first CRM

https://github.com/trycompai/crm
2•handfuloflight•50m ago•0 comments

Testing LLM Concurrency on Consumer Hardware (RTX 5060)

https://ai.2it.onl/posts/concurrency-sweep/
1•MatCat•53m ago•0 comments

ESP32-C3 SuperMini antenna modification

https://peterneufeld.wordpress.com/2025/03/04/esp32-c3-supermini-antenna-modification/
2•ta988•53m ago•0 comments

CodeFloe – Alternative to GitHub

https://codefloe.com
1•mcp_•58m ago•0 comments

Static Sites Without Big Tech Hosting

https://www.souveraen-durch-architektur.de/en/artikel/statische-seiten-ohne-big-tech-hosting
1•mcp_•1h ago•0 comments

DeepSeek V4 Pro GA on GPT 5.6 Sol (xhigh) level for fraction of cost

https://twitter.com/MaxForAI/status/2083481455095959945
2•thewavelength•1h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Btfy – a blockchain that uses weather observations

https://github.com/kotagit75/btfy
2•yuzu_mikan•1h ago•1 comments

California to destroy 420000 peach trees. Del Monte closes canning facilities

https://ubirataonline.com.br/california-farmers-will-destroy-420000-peach-trees-after-del-monte-c...
1•NoRagrets•1h ago•0 comments

Federal Trade Commission vs. Hims and Hers Health, Inc. [pdf]

https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Hims-Complaint-Redacted-E-Filed.pdf
1•luu•1h ago•0 comments

Created a network that combines Hacker News and geniuses at one place

1•silisleek•1h ago•2 comments

Show HN: Run multiple Claude desktop accounts in isolated windows (Mac/Windows)

https://deckspace.dev/claude-accounts/
1•sami_builds•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: LLM is useless without explicit prompt

4•revskill•1y ago
After months playing with LLM models, here's my observation:

- LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

- LLM failed to correct itself. If it generated bullshits, it's an inifinite loop of generating more bullshits.

The question is, without explicit prompt, could LLM leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code without me instruct it at least ?

Comments

ben_w•1y ago
Your expectations are way too high.

> - LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

You can say the same about every dev I've worked with, including myself. This is literally why humans have meetings rather than all of us diving in to whatever we're self-motivated to do.

What does differ is time-scales of the feedback loop with the management:

Humans meetings are daily to weekly.

According to recent research*, the state-of-the-art models are only 50% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert an hour, or 80% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert 10 minutes.

Even if the currently observed trend of increasing time horizons holds, we're 21 months from having an AI where every other daily standup is "ugh, no, you got it wrong", and just over 5 years from them being able to manage a 2-week sprint with an 80% chance of success (in the absence of continuous feedback).

Even that isn't really enough for them to properly "leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code", as archiecture and maintainability are longer horizon tasks than 2-week sprints.

* https://youtu.be/evSFeqTZdqs?si=QIzIjB6hotJ0FgHm

revskill•1y ago
It's not as high as you think.

LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

ben_w•1y ago
Given your expectation:

> It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

And your observation:

> LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

QED, *your expectations* are way too high.

They can't do that yet.