frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: BlazeRules – vectorized YAML rules for JSON, Kafka, and Arrow events

1•jspuri•1m ago•0 comments

Laser Fault Injection on the TROPIC01 Open-Source Secure Element

https://donjon.ledger.com/blog/tropic01-laser-fault-injection/
1•ahlCVA•3m ago•0 comments

Optimistic Sync Library for the Web

https://therealpaulplay.github.io/PlaySocketJS/
1•PaulPlay•5m ago•0 comments

Another Taste of Verse [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIiU-QGzcqc&list=PLQtDWkrawhsE&index=2
1•mpweiher•6m ago•0 comments

Slople – can you pass the reverse Turing test?

https://unslop.run/slople
1•dopamine_daddy•11m ago•1 comments

What AI did to stackoverflow in a graph

https://data.stackexchange.com/stackoverflow/query/1953768#graph
2•secretslol•12m ago•0 comments

Why do AI company logos look like buttholes?

https://velvetshark.com/ai-company-logos-that-look-like-buttholes
1•miniBill•18m ago•0 comments

HAMgpt – what can I do with my radio today?

https://hamgpt.co
1•howard941•20m ago•0 comments

'The Odyssey' Backlash Failed Tremendously

https://www.wired.com/story/the-odyssey-backlash-failed-tremendously/
2•joozio•23m ago•1 comments

Fable 5 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol on an NP-Hard Problem: Does /goal help?

https://charlesazam.com/blog/fable-5-gpt-5-6-sol-goal/
1•couAUIA•24m ago•1 comments

Mr. Spock Does Not Code in ASCII

https://lqlang.org/blog/spock-does-not-code-in-ascii/
3•wickund•27m ago•0 comments

NextBSD project revived: macOS userland tools on FreeBSD kernel

https://www.theregister.com/os-platforms/2026/07/18/nextbsd-returns-to-dollop-apple-source-on-fre...
2•lproven•29m ago•0 comments

Steam Machine: Between 12k and 15k Units Sold per week

https://boilingsteam.com/steam-machine-between-10k-and-15k-sold-per-week/
2•ekianjo•29m ago•0 comments

There's any easy way to rename multiple photos at once

https://apps.microsoft.com/detail/9nl267vtkkmg?hl=en-US&gl=US
1•SolvyCode•31m ago•0 comments

GitHub: TypeScript compiler and JavaScript engine in Lean

https://github.com/jessealama/thales
2•fagnerbrack•39m ago•0 comments

Business Success: Luck, Not Merit

https://fagnerbrack.com/business-success-luck-not-merit-51deca80bfaf
1•fagnerbrack•39m ago•0 comments

Software Engineering Laws

https://newsletter.techworld-with-milan.com/p/the-20-software-engineering-laws
1•fagnerbrack•40m ago•0 comments

AG of Texas secured a settlement of bankruptcy claims against 23andMe

https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-paxton-secures-150-million-se...
1•kythanh•42m ago•0 comments

The Htop for LLM Inference

https://github.com/helasaoudi/llm-inspector
2•helasaoudi•42m ago•0 comments

Continually aim just beyond your current range (2007)

https://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/continually-aim-just-beyond-your-current-range/
1•dorjoy•45m ago•0 comments

Claude shows subtle biases to Anthropic across carefully controlled tests

https://twitter.com/owainevans_uk/status/2078149976807592112
1•nsagent•47m ago•0 comments

European Search Perspective

https://www.eu-searchperspective.com
1•Topfi•51m ago•0 comments

Neil Rimer thinks the AI money is coming back out

https://techcrunch.com/2026/07/17/neil-rimer-thinks-the-ai-money-is-coming-back-out/
1•adithyaharish•56m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Having a child before career has taken off

2•lassearpe•58m ago•4 comments

Show HN: Forward-Only, Autograd-Free PINN with 0ns Zero-Copy Memory Interlock

https://github.com/PJHkorea/Forward_Only_Autograd_Free_PINN
1•PJHkorea•58m ago•1 comments

LG monitors silently install software through Windows Update without consent

https://videocardz.com/newz/lg-monitors-silently-install-software-through-windows-update-without-...
75•baranul•1h ago•16 comments

US lawmakers urge Trump administration to ban Chinese memory chips

https://www.ft.com/content/9e7cdf3c-2e52-492f-afeb-b63d86a53ce6
2•giuliomagnifico•1h ago•1 comments

IEA Warns World Has Just Weeks to Avoid Hormuz Economic Shock

https://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-News/World-News/IEA-Warns-World-Has-Just-Weeks-to-Avoid-Hormuz...
4•baranul•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: GPT-5.6 Sol vs. Claude Fable 5 in CNC Red Alert 2

https://system-2-arena.vercel.app/showcase/ra2?war=sol-vs-fable-lake
2•masterchef2209•1h ago•0 comments

Billion-dollar California salad company exploits undocumented migrants (2014)

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/23/billion-dollar-california-salad-company-exploits-...
2•cramer4next•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: LLM is useless without explicit prompt

4•revskill•1y ago
After months playing with LLM models, here's my observation:

- LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

- LLM failed to correct itself. If it generated bullshits, it's an inifinite loop of generating more bullshits.

The question is, without explicit prompt, could LLM leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code without me instruct it at least ?

Comments

ben_w•1y ago
Your expectations are way too high.

> - LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

You can say the same about every dev I've worked with, including myself. This is literally why humans have meetings rather than all of us diving in to whatever we're self-motivated to do.

What does differ is time-scales of the feedback loop with the management:

Humans meetings are daily to weekly.

According to recent research*, the state-of-the-art models are only 50% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert an hour, or 80% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert 10 minutes.

Even if the currently observed trend of increasing time horizons holds, we're 21 months from having an AI where every other daily standup is "ugh, no, you got it wrong", and just over 5 years from them being able to manage a 2-week sprint with an 80% chance of success (in the absence of continuous feedback).

Even that isn't really enough for them to properly "leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code", as archiecture and maintainability are longer horizon tasks than 2-week sprints.

* https://youtu.be/evSFeqTZdqs?si=QIzIjB6hotJ0FgHm

revskill•1y ago
It's not as high as you think.

LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

ben_w•1y ago
Given your expectation:

> It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

And your observation:

> LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

QED, *your expectations* are way too high.

They can't do that yet.