frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Open Source @Github

fp.

Emacs 31: An unofficial guide to Markdown-ts-mode

https://rahuljuliato.com/posts/markdown-ts-mode-emacs-31
1•RahulMJ•1m ago•0 comments

Sunshine

https://www.guidavid.com/writing/sunshine
1•gdss•2m ago•0 comments

EU slips further behind China, US in race for critical minerals

https://www.ft.com/content/c6220205-ee40-4b71-95c0-d53399a17cd1
1•alephnerd•3m ago•0 comments

Mljar Studio: The Claude Code for Data Science

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIn32b8P7Ns
1•pplonski86•5m ago•0 comments

Why LLMs keep failing their Big Five personality tests

https://hollisrobbinsanecdotal.substack.com/p/teaching-the-ocean-to-swim
1•HR01•6m ago•0 comments

Show HN: RealDiff – runtime behavior diffing for pull requests (six languages)

https://github.com/issacnitin/RealDiff
1•issacnitin•6m ago•0 comments

Cohere Parse: Enterprise document intelligence at scale

https://cohere.com/blog/parse
3•tulpa•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: KnotQ – Calendar and Organization Planner

https://www.knotq.com/
2•enigmurl•7m ago•0 comments

The Breed Is Back Commodore Is Back Alien Breed 35th Anniversary Collection [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ck3vhJ6S_E
2•doener•7m ago•0 comments

I didn't plan to let an AI manage my to-do list

https://heyjonny.dev/posts/ai-managing-my-to-do-list/
2•heyjonny•7m ago•0 comments

Piloting the first double-blind AI evaluations

https://deepmind.google/blog/piloting-the-worlds-first-double-blind-ai-evaluations/
2•xnx•9m ago•0 comments

Aphantasia Beginner's Guide

https://aphantasia.com/guide
2•ksec•9m ago•0 comments

A self-hostable MCP for all your connections, memory, skills, and secrets

https://www.npmjs.com/package/@lanes-sh/link
3•s-xyz•10m ago•0 comments

US Government Designates Host of Noblogs.org a "Global Terrorist"

https://crimethinc.com/2026/08/27/us-government-designates-host-of-noblogsorg-a-global-terrorist
5•robtherobber•11m ago•0 comments

Show HN: BirthdayVideoAI – AI birthday video maker for wishes, invitations

https://birthdayvideo.ai
2•BirthdayVideo•12m ago•0 comments

Building my first SaaS without a coding background

https://www.indiehackers.com/post/building-my-first-saas-without-a-coding-background-ba8468081a
2•zahvox•12m ago•0 comments

Hot Chips 2026: Fujitsu's Monaka CPU – By Chester Lam

https://chipsandcheese.com/p/hot-chips-2026-fujitsus-monaka-cpu
3•rbanffy•14m ago•0 comments

Hot Chips 2026: Intel's Crescent Island – By George Cozma

https://chipsandcheese.com/p/hot-chips-2026-intels-crescent-island
2•rbanffy•14m ago•0 comments

No moving average wins twice

https://turnmarks.com/filters
1•tapweights•16m ago•0 comments

MIT's Ad Hoc Committee on AI Use in Teaching, Learning, and Research Training

https://aiandeducation.mit.edu/report/
2•pbui•16m ago•0 comments

Shieldprompt – test your LLM against prompt injection – no dependencies

https://github.com/Jograph17/shieldprompt
2•Jograoh17•16m ago•0 comments

Confdiff – semantic diff for config files (JSON/YAML/TOML) that redacts secrets

https://github.com/esperanza-volkov/confdiff
1•esperanzavolkov•16m ago•0 comments

Another Webpage Screenshot and OG Image Generation API

1•foodpad•16m ago•0 comments

The difference orbit inclination makes

https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2026/08/22/inclination/
1•ibobev•17m ago•0 comments

Poisson Rate Limiting (2024)

https://louisabraham.github.io/articles/poisson-rate-limiting
1•Bluestein•17m ago•0 comments

Coming Soon

https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2026/08/22/coming-soon/
1•ibobev•18m ago•0 comments

How would you know whether an ancient culture had zero?

https://www.johndcook.com/blog/2026/08/21/ancient-number-system/
1•ibobev•18m ago•0 comments

Are You Sure You Want a Car with a Giant Touch Screen?

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/08/car-prices-memory-ram-ai/688329/
3•vcfgdev•18m ago•0 comments

Show HN: MP4 to Transcript – Convert MP4 to Text Online

https://mp4transcript.com/
1•BirthdayVideo•18m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Diff Glance – CLI that turns a Git diff into a summary and a diagram

https://github.com/alvynmcq/diff-glance
1•alvynmcq•18m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: LLM is useless without explicit prompt

4•revskill•1y ago
After months playing with LLM models, here's my observation:

- LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

- LLM failed to correct itself. If it generated bullshits, it's an inifinite loop of generating more bullshits.

The question is, without explicit prompt, could LLM leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code without me instruct it at least ?

Comments

ben_w•1y ago
Your expectations are way too high.

> - LLM is basically useless without explicit intent in your prompt.

You can say the same about every dev I've worked with, including myself. This is literally why humans have meetings rather than all of us diving in to whatever we're self-motivated to do.

What does differ is time-scales of the feedback loop with the management:

Humans meetings are daily to weekly.

According to recent research*, the state-of-the-art models are only 50% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert an hour, or 80% accurate at tasks that would take a human expert 10 minutes.

Even if the currently observed trend of increasing time horizons holds, we're 21 months from having an AI where every other daily standup is "ugh, no, you got it wrong", and just over 5 years from them being able to manage a 2-week sprint with an 80% chance of success (in the absence of continuous feedback).

Even that isn't really enough for them to properly "leverage all the best practices to provide maintainable code", as archiecture and maintainability are longer horizon tasks than 2-week sprints.

* https://youtu.be/evSFeqTZdqs?si=QIzIjB6hotJ0FgHm

revskill•1y ago
It's not as high as you think.

LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

ben_w•1y ago
Given your expectation:

> It's my expectation is that, at least, some kind of maintainable code is generated from what's it's learnt.

And your observation:

> LLM failed at the most basic things related to maintainable code. Its code is basicaly a hackery mess without any structure at all.

QED, *your expectations* are way too high.

They can't do that yet.