frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Los Alamos Primer

https://blog.szczepan.org/blog/los-alamos-primer/
1•alkyon•2m ago•0 comments

NewASM Virtual Machine

https://github.com/bracesoftware/newasm
1•DEntisT_•4m ago•0 comments

Terminal-Bench 2.0 Leaderboard

https://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0
1•tosh•4m ago•0 comments

I vibe coded a BBS bank with a real working ledger

https://mini-ledger.exe.xyz/
1•simonvc•5m ago•1 comments

The Path to Mojo 1.0

https://www.modular.com/blog/the-path-to-mojo-1-0
1•tosh•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I'm 75, building an OSS Virtual Protest Protocol for digital activism

https://github.com/voice-of-japan/Virtual-Protest-Protocol/blob/main/README.md
4•sakanakana00•11m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I built Divvy to split restaurant bills from a photo

https://divvyai.app/
3•pieterdy•13m ago•0 comments

Hot Reloading in Rust? Subsecond and Dioxus to the Rescue

https://codethoughts.io/posts/2026-02-07-rust-hot-reloading/
3•Tehnix•14m ago•1 comments

Skim – vibe review your PRs

https://github.com/Haizzz/skim
2•haizzz•15m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Open-source AI assistant for interview reasoning

https://github.com/evinjohnn/natively-cluely-ai-assistant
4•Nive11•15m ago•6 comments

Tech Edge: A Living Playbook for America's Technology Long Game

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2026-01/260120_EST_Tech_Edge_0.pdf?Version...
2•hunglee2•19m ago•0 comments

Golden Cross vs. Death Cross: Crypto Trading Guide

https://chartscout.io/golden-cross-vs-death-cross-crypto-trading-guide
2•chartscout•22m ago•0 comments

Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

https://www.spritely.institute/hoot/
3•AlexeyBrin•25m ago•0 comments

What the longevity experts don't tell you

https://machielreyneke.com/blog/longevity-lessons/
2•machielrey•26m ago•1 comments

Monzo wrongly denied refunds to fraud and scam victims

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2026/feb/07/monzo-natwest-hsbc-refunds-fraud-scam-fos-ombudsman
3•tablets•30m ago•1 comments

They were drawn to Korea with dreams of K-pop stardom – but then let down

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgnq9rwyqno
2•breve•33m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI-Powered Merchant Intelligence

https://nodee.co
1•jjkirsch•35m ago•0 comments

Bash parallel tasks and error handling

https://github.com/themattrix/bash-concurrent
2•pastage•35m ago•0 comments

Let's compile Quake like it's 1997

https://fabiensanglard.net/compile_like_1997/index.html
2•billiob•36m ago•0 comments

Reverse Engineering Medium.com's Editor: How Copy, Paste, and Images Work

https://app.writtte.com/read/gP0H6W5
2•birdculture•41m ago•0 comments

Go 1.22, SQLite, and Next.js: The "Boring" Back End

https://mohammedeabdelaziz.github.io/articles/go-next-pt-2
1•mohammede•47m ago•0 comments

Laibach the Whistleblowers [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Mx2mxpaCY
1•KnuthIsGod•49m ago•1 comments

Slop News - The Front Page right now but it's only Slop

https://slop-news.pages.dev/slop-news
1•keepamovin•53m ago•1 comments

Economists vs. Technologists on AI

https://ideasindevelopment.substack.com/p/economists-vs-technologists-on-ai
1•econlmics•55m ago•0 comments

Life at the Edge

https://asadk.com/p/edge
4•tosh•1h ago•0 comments

RISC-V Vector Primer

https://github.com/simplex-micro/riscv-vector-primer/blob/main/index.md
4•oxxoxoxooo•1h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Invoxo – Invoicing with automatic EU VAT for cross-border services

2•InvoxoEU•1h ago•0 comments

A Tale of Two Standards, POSIX and Win32 (2005)

https://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2.html
4•goranmoomin•1h ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Is the Downfall of SaaS Started?

4•throwaw12•1h ago•0 comments

Flirt: The Native Backend

https://blog.buenzli.dev/flirt-native-backend/
3•senekor•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

In a democracy, you should have two votes instead of one

https://pietrasiak.com/in-a-democracy-you-should-have-two-votes-instead-of-one
2•pmontra•9mo ago

Comments

FrankWilhoit•9mo ago
The value of elections, if they have any, is knowing why the winner won. That is why nothing more complicated than first-past-the-post can work, because it is the only thing that people can understand, and why FPTP only works if there are exactly two options on the ballot.
krapp•9mo ago
>That is why nothing more complicated than first-past-the-post can work, because it is the only thing that people can understand,

Except systems more complicated than first-past-the-post do work, and people do understand them. And FPTP doesn't tell you anything about why the winner won. Can you tell me why Trump won? There are more theories than there are grains of sand on a beach. All FPTP can tell us is that he got more electoral votes than his opponent. Once, that even happened when he lost the popular vote.

Aloisius•9mo ago
Why people voted for someone is different from why the winner was chosen from the votes cast. The former is impossible absent forcing everyone to write justifications, the latter though does have a range of understandability.

A lot of voting systems, mostly ranked systems, are essentially black boxes. These can't easily be understood because often, one can't publish intermediate voting tallies without compromising anonymity. These systems can't be easily audited, independently validated or manually recounted. Answering why someone won from the votes cast in these is exceptionally difficult (which of course makes them wonderful targets for election rigging).

That said, FPTP isn't the only easy to understand voting system. Approval voting is just as easy to grasp since aggregate intermediate tallies can be released like with FPTP.

dragonwriter•9mo ago
> A lot of voting systems, mostly ranked systems, are essentially black boxes. These can't easily be understood because often, one can't publish intermediate voting tallies without compromising anonymity.

There are some voting systems where intermediate tallies are complex to produce, very large, or hard to understand, but I can't think of any where they would compromise anonymity.

Aloisius•9mo ago
By intermediate tallies, I mean ones that could be directly used with others to compute the final result.

This can't be done most ranked voting systems in common use in races with truly unique cast ballots - likely in races with a large number of candidates - since one can't do the aggregation necessary to ensure the level of anonymity necessary to prevent someone from verifying you voted the way you told/paid them to. Without them, you can't produce the intermediate counts (often done at the local level) that can be used to calculate the final result.

dtgm92•9mo ago
This is about voting in an election... essentially voting for who will be voting on your behalf for the next x years.

I don't get it honestly, If you aren't actually voting on actual decisions yourself. If democracy isn't a dumb idea, then that is how it should be. The moment someone else is deciding things for you is when it makes no sense.

But even then, if we did vote on everything, someone else is still deciding what the voting options are. And the rest is being decided without a vote by other random people nobody voted to elect.

Giving you an extra vote just for the electing process isnt really going to improve the democratic system.

beardyw•9mo ago
Is this different to Single Transferable Vote?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote

fitzzy•9mo ago
My impression is that the article author isn't aware that this system exists and is used in other democracies. It's used in Australia, and is pretty effective IMO.