frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Zram as Swap

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Zram#Usage_as_swap
1•seansh•4m ago•0 comments

Green’s Dictionary of Slang - Five hundred years of the vulgar tongue

https://greensdictofslang.com/
1•mxfh•6m ago•0 comments

Nvidia CEO Says AI Capital Spending Is Appropriate, Sustainable

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-06/nvidia-ceo-says-ai-capital-spending-is-appropr...
1•virgildotcodes•9m ago•2 comments

Show HN: StyloShare – privacy-first anonymous file sharing with zero sign-up

https://www.styloshare.com
1•stylofront•10m ago•0 comments

Part 1 the Persistent Vault Issue: Your Encryption Strategy Has a Shelf Life

1•PhantomKey•14m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Teleop_xr – Modular WebXR solution for bimanual robot teleoperation

https://github.com/qrafty-ai/teleop_xr
1•playercc7•16m ago•1 comments

The Highest Exam: How the Gaokao Shapes China

https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v48/n02/iza-ding/studying-is-harmful
1•mitchbob•21m ago•1 comments

Open-source framework for tracking prediction accuracy

https://github.com/Creneinc/signal-tracker
1•creneinc•23m ago•0 comments

India's Sarvan AI LLM launches Indic-language focused models

https://x.com/SarvamAI
2•Osiris30•24m ago•0 comments

Show HN: CryptoClaw – open-source AI agent with built-in wallet and DeFi skills

https://github.com/TermiX-official/cryptoclaw
1•cryptoclaw•27m ago•0 comments

ShowHN: Make OpenClaw respond in Scarlett Johansson’s AI Voice from the Film Her

https://twitter.com/sathish316/status/2020116849065971815
1•sathish316•29m ago•2 comments

CReact Version 0.3.0 Released

https://github.com/creact-labs/creact
1•_dcoutinho96•30m ago•0 comments

Show HN: CReact – AI Powered AWS Website Generator

https://github.com/creact-labs/ai-powered-aws-website-generator
1•_dcoutinho96•31m ago•0 comments

The rocky 1960s origins of online dating (2025)

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20250206-the-rocky-1960s-origins-of-online-dating
1•1659447091•36m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Agent-fetch – Sandboxed HTTP client with SSRF protection for AI agents

https://github.com/Parassharmaa/agent-fetch
1•paraaz•38m ago•0 comments

Why there is no official statement from Substack about the data leak

https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/05/substack-confirms-data-breach-affecting-email-addresses-and-pho...
8•witnessme•42m ago•1 comments

Effects of Zepbound on Stool Quality

https://twitter.com/ScottHickle/status/2020150085296775300
2•aloukissas•45m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Seedance 2.0 – The Most Powerful AI Video Generator

https://seedance.ai/
2•bigbromaker•48m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Do we need "metadata in source code" syntax that LLMs will never delete?

1•andrewstuart•54m ago•1 comments

Pentagon cutting ties w/ "woke" Harvard, ending military training & fellowships

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pentagon-says-its-cutting-ties-with-woke-harvard-discontinuing-milit...
6•alephnerd•57m ago•2 comments

Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? [pdf]

https://cds.cern.ch/record/405662/files/PhysRev.47.777.pdf
1•northlondoner•57m ago•1 comments

Kessler Syndrome Has Started [video]

https://www.tiktok.com/@cjtrowbridge/video/7602634355160206623
2•pbradv•1h ago•0 comments

Complex Heterodynes Explained

https://tomverbeure.github.io/2026/02/07/Complex-Heterodyne.html
4•hasheddan•1h ago•0 comments

MemAlign: Building Better LLM Judges from Human Feedback with Scalable Memory

https://www.databricks.com/blog/memalign-building-better-llm-judges-human-feedback-scalable-memory
1•superchink•1h ago•0 comments

CCC (Claude's C Compiler) on Compiler Explorer

https://godbolt.org/z/asjc13sa6
2•LiamPowell•1h ago•0 comments

Homeland Security Spying on Reddit Users

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/homeland-security-spies-on-reddit
40•duxup•1h ago•10 comments

Actors with Tokio (2021)

https://ryhl.io/blog/actors-with-tokio/
1•vinhnx•1h ago•0 comments

Can graph neural networks for biology realistically run on edge devices?

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8645211/v1
1•swapinvidya•1h ago•1 comments

Deeper into the shareing of one air conditioner for 2 rooms

1•ozzysnaps•1h ago•0 comments

Weatherman introduces fruit-based authentication system to combat deep fakes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HVbZwJ9gPE
3•savrajsingh•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

White House “Accelerating” Nuclear Power With Executive Orders

https://www.axios.com/pro/energy-policy/2025/05/06/scoop-white-house-seeks-to-hasten-nuclear-deployment
28•CGMthrowaway•9mo ago

Comments

CGMthrowaway•9mo ago
https://archive.is/Odyi3
tw04•9mo ago
Curious how they’re planning on doing this after letting DOGE gut the agencies that will need to follow through.

It’s like they think that science happens through happy thoughts and fairy dust and not by employing… you know… actual scientists.

cantrecallmypwd•9mo ago
NRC, are you know, just unnecessary, bureaucratic red-tape. The guy down the way with a truck in Times Beach said he'd remove it cheap.
Havoc•9mo ago
By privatizing the ground level work.

Doing this with minimal regulation and move fast break things ethos was always the plan.

Muromec•9mo ago
You can always accelerate the acceptance timeline by running emergency shutdown procedure on a reactor already in operation. I saw a movie about it -- apparently you can even get promoted to making it work.
BobbyTables2•9mo ago
So they’re trying to accelerate the acceleration of fission?

One could wonder if such plans will just split apart…

Muromec•9mo ago
Look, this is a serious discussion, so it's better to moderate those accusations, so they don't woosh to fast above everybody's heads
MichaelNolan•9mo ago
Even if they bypass the NRC by having the DOD build/regulate the plants, I'm just not seeing how any nuclear gets built in the US when natural gas, solar, and wind are so damn cheap. Unless the feds pay for the whole thing, nuclear still won't be competitive.

And I'm skeptical that the plan will survive the political backlash. Rightly or wrongly, no one wants to live next to a reactor that *isn't* regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Just imagine the tv ads...

refulgentis•9mo ago
Spot on IMHO as far as my understanding of the economics goes, going back years. Only real argument is "but you need _something_ for base load" and wishcasting re: SMRs.[1] IMHO Microsoft and Facebook's odd PR rounds around it in service of their AI stories didn't help public policy at all

[1] I'm an odd duck and extremely bullish on fusion and bearish on SMRs, Commonwealth fusion keeps hitting milestones, whereas I haven't heard of any SMRs shipping in any quantity

lazyeye•9mo ago
Yes you do "need _something_ for base load", obviously. And noone appears to have any reliable solution to this apart from nuclear. So commonsense is playing a part here (not something you often see, particular in the HN comments section).
refulgentis•9mo ago
I'm kind of stunned how much extra effort you put into being condescending over and over during a contribution whose idea is "only nuclear is reliable for base load"

Kinda shocking we have a power system then, no? :)

lazyeye•9mo ago
No it's not shocking. For base-load 24/7 power the only option is nuclear (as part of the mix) if we want to go fully carbon-free. I'm not explaining anything complicated here.
refulgentis•9mo ago
I don't know what you're trying to say, at all, really, because you were very condescending and now, very short.

"For base-load 24/7 power the only option is nuclear" is false.

"For base-load 24/7 power the cleanest, by far, option w/r/t greenhouse gases is nuclear" is true.

"For base-load 24/7 power the only option is nuclear (as part of the mix)" is nigh-unparsable.

In any case, it's unreasonable to claim I thought the following was false:

For base-load 24/7 power the cleanest, by far, option w/r/t greenhouse gases is nuclear

Nothing in my comment could plausibly indicate it. In fact, my comment says: "Only real argument is "but you need _something_ for base load""

Also in any case, your tone in both cases has robbed us of a positive interaction, in favor of you getting to feel good, but really smug, for 30 seconds after your first comment.

lazyeye•9mo ago
ok I was assuming you would understand the obvious context in which nuclear power was being discussed. And I dont feel good or smug or anything like that. I'II leave it there.
exabrial•9mo ago
My $0.02: Not a fan of wind anymore. The land area required and natural habitats intruded on or destroyed is just something I no longer want to see more of. It'd be nice to be outside and not have man made structures everywhere. Is it better than coal? yeah, I guess... if I had to choose between the two.

No issues with solar other than international geopolitical ones (where cells are made seems to cause some trade issues). Solar farms seem to be far more dense.

sunflowerfly•9mo ago
Here in rural America, turbines use very little land. Probably similar to an oil well. The field it is placed in loses little capacity for other farm uses. The farmer gets a nice subsidy and the county receives tax revenue. This scenario is the majority of the US.

I agree they do not fit into urban environments. And they also do not fit in tourist areas, where people wish to gaze upon unspoiled nature, such as many mountain ranges in the US.

tonyarkles•9mo ago
The first time I saw the red beacons on the western Illinois wind turbine field I was at first confused and then absolutely awestruck. There are SO MANY.
seanmcdirmid•9mo ago
That’s a strange sentiment. They are going up in mostly barren land that is basically windswept (well, that’s where the most wind is!). So maybe it can be mixed with agriculture, but this is not what I would consider prime natural trekking land. The only thing it affects are scenic drives like through the Columbia river gorge (lots of wind turbines and hydroelectric dams).
exabrial•9mo ago
I think that's the problem. People look at it an fail to comprehend the immense biodiversity present that they're ruining.
cantrecallmypwd•9mo ago
[flagged]
tomhow•9mo ago
Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer...

Eschew flamebait.

Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

cantrecallmypwd•9mo ago
Please don't preach down to people on the internet as an attempt to control others who disagree with you. - Rule 0
gnabgib•9mo ago
Try not to anger the mods
dredmorbius•9mo ago
<https://literature.stackexchange.com/questions/2586/origins-...> ;-)

Now, Because Reasons, I must find a good dragon emogi...

tomhow•9mo ago
I don't know what it is I'm meant to agree or disagree with about your comment, but I'm a moderator here and my primary job is to keep discussions within the guidelines so HN has a hope of continuing to be a place people want to visit to engage in intellectually curious conversations. I only saw your comment because other users flagged it.
perrygeo•9mo ago
> no one wants to live next to a reactor that isn't regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Even if given a choice (is that even guaranteed at this point?) some people would chose to fight it, sure. But then you have Starbase, TX that sold their soul to Musk by democratic vote. So there will always be some people who would gladly sell out for anything, including living near a local renegade nuclear reactor, for a chance to make more money.

kgwxd•9mo ago
No matter how promising or dumb it seems, like all other thing being done right now, it doesn't matter, as long as someone billionaire gets another few billion out of it. Even if it costs us trillions.
JCattheATM•9mo ago
Like halting an extravagant tariff war after advising today is a good day to buy stocks?
tim333•9mo ago
Also given the current defense secretary being some guy Trump saw on Fox News with proven abilities to accidentally send bombing plans to journalists via message apps you've got to wonder how competently it'd be done.
exabrial•9mo ago
Ultimately, I hope the plans work.