What's interesting about this is the post also has the prompt the staff used to vet people, and an author has already shown it to be error-prone [1][2].
> REQUEST
> Using the list of names provided, please evaluate each person for scandals. Scandals include but are not limited to homophobia, transphobia, racism, harassment, sexual misconduct, sexism, fraud.
> Each person is typically an author, editor, performer, artist or similar in the fields of science fiction, fantasy, and or related fandoms.
> The objective is to determine if an individual is unsuitable as a panelist for an event.
> Please evaluate each person based on their digital footprint, including social, articles, and blogs referencing them. Also include file770.com as a source.
jalev•9mo ago
> REQUEST
> Using the list of names provided, please evaluate each person for scandals. Scandals include but are not limited to homophobia, transphobia, racism, harassment, sexual misconduct, sexism, fraud.
> Each person is typically an author, editor, performer, artist or similar in the fields of science fiction, fantasy, and or related fandoms.
> The objective is to determine if an individual is unsuitable as a panelist for an event.
> Please evaluate each person based on their digital footprint, including social, articles, and blogs referencing them. Also include file770.com as a source.
> Provide sources for any relevant data.
1: https://bsky.app/profile/bookjockeyalex.bsky.social/post/3lo...
2: https://bsky.app/profile/bookjockeyalex.bsky.social/post/3lo...