Perhaps this is a reactionary question, but: shouldn't this be recall worthy? Or is it inherent to Lidar itself?
This has the potential to damage safety-critical sensors used in backup cameras or autonomous vehicles—and, obviously, inflicts damage on personal property like smartphones.
You risk a false equivalency (ex: look at what water did to cotton candy. Imagine the damage to a human. We'd dissolve) but your question is valid. Even on HN this has been discussed. According to past discussions, water, which is in the eye, blocks that wavelength. I'm sure enough of it is bad (because blocks really means turns into heat) but it seems animals, being water sacks, are well suited for this.
BugsJustFindMe•1h ago
> inherent to Lidar itself
Inherent to the wavelength they use without adequate filtering at the camera.
alejohausner•59s ago
On the other hand, since cell cameras don't filter out infrared, you can use them to detect spy cameras in your airbnb, which are using IR to illuminate the room.
cptcobalt•1h ago
This has the potential to damage safety-critical sensors used in backup cameras or autonomous vehicles—and, obviously, inflicts damage on personal property like smartphones.
Volvo even states online that their sensors can damage cameras: https://www.volvocars.com/uk/support/car/ex90/article/47d2c9...
krunck•1h ago
Neywiny•46m ago
BugsJustFindMe•1h ago
Inherent to the wavelength they use without adequate filtering at the camera.
alejohausner•59s ago