frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

The Path to Mojo 1.0

https://www.modular.com/blog/the-path-to-mojo-1-0
1•tosh•2m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I'm 75, building an OSS Virtual Protest Protocol for digital activism

https://github.com/voice-of-japan/Virtual-Protest-Protocol/blob/main/README.md
3•sakanakana00•5m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I built Divvy to split restaurant bills from a photo

https://divvyai.app/
3•pieterdy•8m ago•0 comments

Hot Reloading in Rust? Subsecond and Dioxus to the Rescue

https://codethoughts.io/posts/2026-02-07-rust-hot-reloading/
3•Tehnix•8m ago•1 comments

Skim – vibe review your PRs

https://github.com/Haizzz/skim
2•haizzz•10m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Open-source AI assistant for interview reasoning

https://github.com/evinjohnn/natively-cluely-ai-assistant
3•Nive11•10m ago•4 comments

Tech Edge: A Living Playbook for America's Technology Long Game

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2026-01/260120_EST_Tech_Edge_0.pdf?Version...
2•hunglee2•14m ago•0 comments

Golden Cross vs. Death Cross: Crypto Trading Guide

https://chartscout.io/golden-cross-vs-death-cross-crypto-trading-guide
2•chartscout•16m ago•0 comments

Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

https://www.spritely.institute/hoot/
3•AlexeyBrin•19m ago•0 comments

What the longevity experts don't tell you

https://machielreyneke.com/blog/longevity-lessons/
2•machielrey•20m ago•1 comments

Monzo wrongly denied refunds to fraud and scam victims

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2026/feb/07/monzo-natwest-hsbc-refunds-fraud-scam-fos-ombudsman
3•tablets•25m ago•0 comments

They were drawn to Korea with dreams of K-pop stardom – but then let down

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgnq9rwyqno
2•breve•27m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI-Powered Merchant Intelligence

https://nodee.co
1•jjkirsch•30m ago•0 comments

Bash parallel tasks and error handling

https://github.com/themattrix/bash-concurrent
2•pastage•30m ago•0 comments

Let's compile Quake like it's 1997

https://fabiensanglard.net/compile_like_1997/index.html
2•billiob•31m ago•0 comments

Reverse Engineering Medium.com's Editor: How Copy, Paste, and Images Work

https://app.writtte.com/read/gP0H6W5
2•birdculture•36m ago•0 comments

Go 1.22, SQLite, and Next.js: The "Boring" Back End

https://mohammedeabdelaziz.github.io/articles/go-next-pt-2
1•mohammede•42m ago•0 comments

Laibach the Whistleblowers [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Mx2mxpaCY
1•KnuthIsGod•43m ago•1 comments

Slop News - The Front Page right now but it's only Slop

https://slop-news.pages.dev/slop-news
1•keepamovin•48m ago•1 comments

Economists vs. Technologists on AI

https://ideasindevelopment.substack.com/p/economists-vs-technologists-on-ai
1•econlmics•50m ago•0 comments

Life at the Edge

https://asadk.com/p/edge
4•tosh•56m ago•0 comments

RISC-V Vector Primer

https://github.com/simplex-micro/riscv-vector-primer/blob/main/index.md
4•oxxoxoxooo•59m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Invoxo – Invoicing with automatic EU VAT for cross-border services

2•InvoxoEU•1h ago•0 comments

A Tale of Two Standards, POSIX and Win32 (2005)

https://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2.html
4•goranmoomin•1h ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Is the Downfall of SaaS Started?

4•throwaw12•1h ago•0 comments

Flirt: The Native Backend

https://blog.buenzli.dev/flirt-native-backend/
3•senekor•1h ago•0 comments

OpenAI's Latest Platform Targets Enterprise Customers

https://aibusiness.com/agentic-ai/openai-s-latest-platform-targets-enterprise-customers
2•myk-e•1h ago•0 comments

Goldman Sachs taps Anthropic's Claude to automate accounting, compliance roles

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/06/anthropic-goldman-sachs-ai-model-accounting.html
4•myk-e•1h ago•5 comments

Ai.com bought by Crypto.com founder for $70M in biggest-ever website name deal

https://www.ft.com/content/83488628-8dfd-4060-a7b0-71b1bb012785
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•1h ago•1 comments

Big Tech's AI Push Is Costing More Than the Moon Landing

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-spending-tech-companies-compared-02b90046
6•1vuio0pswjnm7•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

The AI jobs crisis is here, now

https://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/the-ai-jobs-crisis-is-here-now
35•devonnull•9mo ago

Comments

orionblastar•9mo ago
I wonder what happens when the AI starts to hallucinate? https://www.sify.com/ai-analytics/the-hilarious-and-horrifyi...
sigwinch•9mo ago
According to the article, pathology and double entendres are now ungated on Duolingo.
DanAtC•9mo ago
Any time I see AI "art" I assume the worst: https://newsocialist.org.uk/transmissions/ai-the-new-aesthet...
k310•9mo ago
Art? A friend of 40 years asked me if my beautiful sunset photo was real. I sent lens data and the image was EXIF tagged.

Nothing is real anymore?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43942930#43943277

mingus88•9mo ago
The one bright spot I see is that the internet as a source of information is soon over.

In the 90s, the internet promised a utopia connecting people across the globe instantly where censorship was damage to be routed around, and information was free.

In 2025, the internet is a dystopia of misinformation, making everyone dumber and easier to manipulate. Oligarchs own all the platforms and nobody even cares.

The faster that AI ruins it the better. We go back to creating personal connections, building local communities. Happier people making impact in each others lives for real.

OutOfHere•9mo ago
That makes no sense. Niche topics require global connections. There just aren't enough locals for niche topics.

Also, one can't really build something that lasts without knowing the whole truth about it. The internet still is the best place to discover the truth, although it takes some effort and corroboration.

mingus88•9mo ago
The nice thing about being old is that I lived in a world before the internet. We did fine.

I feel bad for people who grew up “digitally native” and seem shocked at the concept and can’t even comprehend living without being online 24x7

tmsh•9mo ago
I think it’s more like AI empowers and 3x’s the creatives that learn to use it. In all fields where highly intelligent auto-complete is useful it replaces 2/3rds of who you need to hire. The key is to learn to use the tools. As it has always been with new tools like computers etc.
pupppet•9mo ago
It's not just a new tool. It replaces the person using the tool, and we're all being conditioned into believing whatever AI churns out, which will never be anything more than average, is good enough.
yuppire•9mo ago
Totally!

That’s why those “creatives” who used llms to write their movie won 3x as many Oscars, and the ones who used them to write their tv show won 3x as many Emmys, and the ones who used them to write their music won 3x as many Grammys!

musicale•9mo ago
One might imagine that the layoff-based business model for AI could eventually backfire once people discover how bad the output is, but the incentives seem aligned for a society with heaps of low-quality, AI-generated garbage and a major unemployment/underemployment.
kasperni•9mo ago
With the current speed of AI progress. We are probably 1 or 2 years away from any generic AI being able to teach languages better than Duolingo.
PNewling•9mo ago
From the state of Duolingo, I think we've already passed that point by a bit. And I'm not even a huge AI-replacement-alarmist. It's more that Duolingo is not optimal (or even good/great) at teaching language. I will give it its due, it does help with vocabulary memorization.
cadamsdotcom•9mo ago
No one owes anyone a job. Systems like that have been tried and they don’t work.

This is going to be a bumpy transition but at the other end the jobs that survive will be creative and fulfilling - for example, people automating work, every day, so (barring corner cases) no one has to do that task again.

Putting AI in and letting it do a bad job is a great way for AI to be in there eventually doing a good job. Humans may not be needed to do the work but they will be needed to tend to the systems and automations driving the AI - and/or to the agents driving the AI. They’ll be needed to improve what the AI is doing, handle corner cases, and add new use cases. And they’ll fill in the gaps - until those can be automated too.

Once everyone’s doing that, it’ll be an automation race. The more humans a company has the more capability it will have to automate more work. Then we’ll be back to full steam hiring, but the skill sets will be very different. At places like Duolingo, job titles like “AI automation specialist” will replace “translator”.

It’s going to be okay, we will get through this!

glimshe•9mo ago
While I mostly agree with you, I also believe there is no guarantee that a human will always be needed to tend the AI. Your argument assumes an arbitrary capability level for the AI, one that is comfortable for the human. It's quite possible also that humans won't be needed at all for many, if not most, tasks.
Grimblewald•9mo ago
Perhaps, but if we wont let people kill themsleves, we do at least owe them a livable income.
cadamsdotcom•9mo ago
Perhaps - but this “we” you speak of has to be better defined before others can agree or disagree with you.
Grimblewald•9mo ago
we being a democratic majority, or whatever group structure holds power, that hopefully "we" are a part of. If we're not a part of any power structure, then why are "we" even talking about it?
azaras•9mo ago
"No one owes anyone a job"

A job no, but an income.

The humanity does not need to be more productive, we have enough of all, products and services.

What we need is reduce the working time and dedicate the time to flourish, read, write, music, sports, maths, philosophy... Less consuming and more creating.