> Still, this isn't the worst setback. [… stuff how the satellite will be used over southern America …]
I was waiting for the description of an even worse setback, which makes the satellite even more limited, but it seems like „this isn’t the worst setback“ was supposed to mean „it’s not too bad, we can still do other useful stuff“. Was that understandable for native speakers?
> I was waiting …
I think your instinct and expectation were correct. The article reads:
> The info provided by Biomass will be a critical step forward.
I think it should read "The info provided by Biomass would be a critical step forward." ("Would" should be used because it's discussing a hypothetical situation contrary to fact — contrary to fact because the restrictions impede the collection of the desired data.)
My guess is that it's either sloppy editing or LLM-generated text.
The most natural way is as you have read it.
However, it is also valid in the sense of "this is a setback, but it's not all that bad". (You might write, "Still, this isn't the worst setback ever.")
You would need to read enough to realize by later lack of a description of the worst setback to realize the former, most natural way, is not in use.
It's like the awful phrase 'I could care less' I suppose.
I've read other information about ICBM-detecting satellites being triggered by the sun glinting off lakes having the same signature as an ICBM launch.
Surely the orbit of this satellite will be well known and so false positives alarms can be ruled out?
I suppose it's possible that a bad actor could time a real ICBM launch to coincide with this satellite's orbit to defeat Early Warning Systems, but then again they could just launch submarine-based ICBMs from the southern equator.
It's not the physical presence of the satellite over the US that messes up (or could) ICBM detection, it's the operation of the satellite's radar system. That's why they have to turn off the radar when it's over the US and Europe.
perihelions•1d ago
https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/04/18/1115388/esa-airb...
I guess that's referring to things such as these?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PAVE_PAWS ("...The radar operates in the UHF band between 420 - 450 MHz...")