coreaudio doesn't need pulse nor jack nor pipewire to allow a single device to be opened by multiple applications.

ALSA additionally specifies every 2 channels as separate 2channel devices, so your 8 channel audio interface looks like 4.

the confusion is added to by device tree overlays such that you may find your pro audio 8 channel device is always seen as a surround setup, replete wirh highpass filtering on the principle pair of outputs, and you don't know why your poor desktop environments sound device doesn't show this...

The interfaces are absolutely not better, they're a bunch of ~~undocumented~~ C preprocessor macros that hide a pit of complexity and indirection. Pulse is mature enough that you can figure out how to interface with it, pipewire has a handful of examples and some reference documentation that doesn't make sense if you don't already know what you're looking for. Good luck if those examples don't fit nicely into your existing applications' architectures.

Pipewire is very impressive as an achievement, but the work needs to be put in to make it mature enough as a software project (meaning: documentation and well typed interfaces) before existing software can work with it.

The architecture may well be better equipped to provide stable and elegant interfaces to complex media routing problems in application software. But I couldn't tell you if that's true or not, because it's sparsely documented. An undiscoverable API is a nonexistent one.

edit: I wrote this ignorantly before looking back at the pipewire docs. They've improved since I last looked, but I still find the docs lacking (comparable to Apple's docs, which is not a compliment) and the overall interface design of Pipewire a massive challenge to grasp. It might be better, but I don't know. The last time I tried to implement direct support for pipewire in a Linux app I gave up because of its design and lack of useful documentation.