When you don't do motion blur, certain scenes (eg. Something moving fast across the screen) look different even up to 1000 FPS.
However the real fix is to properly do the math of motion blur.
Likewise I turn all other image quality reducing options off: depth of field, vignetting, chromatic aberration, bloom, etc.
Motion blur is effectively anti aliasing but instead of in the spacial domain, it is the time domain.
- 2 or 3 lengthy (a minut or so) popups each time it is turned on, without option to disable them
- Washed out colors randomly when switching to HDR
- TOS agreements that can't be agreed upon and stay on the screen
- Prevents computer to go to sleep mode, combined with OLED burnin that is mindblowing
- Physical problems like shaky parts
Hard skip, can't recommend it to anyone, despite good reviews all around.
In true lossless mode it's not happening, DP2.1 caps out at 267hz when pushing raw 4K HDR, but with lossy DSC it should be possible to push upwards of 500hz.
> Of course, the headline feature is the 500Hz refresh rate, but there's also a 0.03ms response time (GTG) and QHD resolution, VESA Display HDR True Black 500 HDR, and HDR10+ Gaming.
I might prefer the 4k LG that does 240Hz and can switch to 480Hz for 1080p (if I were a meaningfully competitive gamer, which I'm not).
hoseja•9mo ago
However, improvements in brightness and contrast are wonderful.
m-schuetz•9mo ago
dontlaugh•9mo ago
It also helps that’s it’s a multiple of both 24 and 60. It’s only 50 that is missed out.
theandrewbailey•9mo ago
m-schuetz•9mo ago
preisschild•9mo ago
(Experience from using the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 57" 240Hz MiniLED Monitor)
preisschild•8mo ago
There is this test, which has different frame content in rows.
60Hz is extremely blurry compared to 120Hz. The difference from 120Hz to 240Hz is noticeable, but not by a lot.