https://www.eventbrite.ca/e/coach-house-spring-group-launch-...
> The rest of us might think we achieve artistic immortality if our work lasts a century or three. Bök blows his nose at such puny ambitions. His work might get deciphered by Fermi aliens who finally make it to our neighborhood a billion years from now. It could be iterating right up until the sun swallows this planet whole.
I got frisson reading this. I may have to read the author's novels, his writing style is compelling.
Yeah, for free.
And indeed, his style is like this. It's really hard to put the book down.
I have to read it a couple more times to savor this. What a delight!
I was unaware of this demagogue of a bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. It survives levels of radiation that is designed to kill all lifeforms. Wikipedia [0] lists this as a bacteria that supports panspermia -- that life originated elsewhere but spread through cosmic dust and was seeded on Earth eventually.
Fun fact: Thermococcus gammatolerans is known to be the one that tolerates the most toxic radiation.
Anyone know what this is referring to? The only instance I know of was the Surveyor 3 camera, which was supposedly Streptococcus mitis and even that situation is greatly contested.
Also see https://ars.electronica.art/aeblog/en/2018/05/30/im-humanity...
jkingsman•4h ago
If you enjoy hard to very-hard science fiction, I strongly recommend the first book of his series, Blindsight. I thoroughly loved the read and bounced right back to the beginning for a second read with the context I'd gained on the first one. It's an absolute firehose of concepts; reminded me a bit of Accelerando by Charles Stross but a little less pleased with its own geekiness. The best summary I could give would be a meditation on consciousness set against a first-contact backdrop.
subscribed•3h ago
And what I found particularly interesting, the afterword is about as interesting and engaging as the book.
It's such a gem of a book.
otikik•3h ago
Boogie_Man•3h ago
Originally, I thought it meant "very hard to understand" i.e. very technically complicated
ZpJuUuNaQ5•2h ago
>I thought it meant "very hard to understand"
For a mere mortal like myself, those definitions aren't mutually exclusive. I think I tried reading "Blindsight" a long time ago but never got past a few dozen pages. Maybe I should give it a try again someday.
Scene_Cast2•2h ago
I love sci-fi, I love challenging ideas, and I really liked the concepts explored in Blindsight - except that I learned those concepts through summaries and selective reading.
jkingsman•2h ago
I found this INCREDIBLY FULL OF SPOILERS explanation of fundamental plot points to be helpful in confirming or summarizing some things I missed[0].
[0]: —-EXTREME SPOILER WARNING-- https://old.reddit.com/r/printSF/comments/4p6zqj/understandi...
Boogie_Man•2h ago
jkingsman•2h ago
mordechai9000•1h ago
Scarblac•1h ago
Whereas soft science fiction has a futuristic setting but isn't primarily about that.
ngangaga•1h ago
NikolaNovak•3h ago
His Starfish book however has the most realistic, plausible, feasible, likely AI doomsday scenario though - published as it was 26 years ago and without AI being the focus for majority of the book.