<motions to the human 'overseer'>
"Your human, they'll have to wait outside."
(Star Wars: A New Hope)
I just had a look at the wikipedia page for the company behind it (American Machine and Foundry). AMfare isn't mentioned, but there is a section called "Bowling pinsetters and nuclear reactors".
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Xop9py8zBY
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Machine_and_Foundry
It shows how hard automation is and that it could be done earlier then ppl think it could be.
edit: It is really silly how the "robot restaurant" in Korea do the dishes by hand ...
They seem to have this entirely backwards.
The robots should be in the truck cab for a start, driving the trucks.
But even if there are human drivers who need these stops, the robots should then be doing the drudgier and more easily automated work; cleaning dishes, mopping the floor, prepping ingredients, and leave the cooking to an actual chef, and the human interaction to an actual human.
No matter how much gets automated we humans need autonomy, mastery, and purpose. Robots won't be accepted long term unless they are repairable by those who lose money when they stop; tweakable down to movements, ingredient quantities etc. so recipes can be made exactly as desired. Restaurateurs need to own the outcome, soup to nuts. The whole thing lives or dies on having extremely good product people at the robot vendors - people who truly care.
Bring on the vibe fooding :)
logic_node•8mo ago
However, this shift raises concerns about the impact on traditional culinary practices and the roles of human chefs. While efficiency and consistency are achieved, the unique touch and cultural significance that human chefs bring to traditional dishes may be diminished.
It's worth considering a hybrid approach where robots handle repetitive tasks, allowing human chefs to focus on creativity and maintaining the cultural essence of the cuisine. This balance could help preserve culinary traditions while embracing technological advancements.