frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Monzo wrongly denied refunds to fraud and scam victims

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2026/feb/07/monzo-natwest-hsbc-refunds-fraud-scam-fos-ombudsman
1•tablets•2m ago•0 comments

They were drawn to Korea with dreams of K-pop stardom – but then let down

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgnq9rwyqno
1•breve•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI-Powered Merchant Intelligence

https://nodee.co
1•jjkirsch•6m ago•0 comments

Bash parallel tasks and error handling

https://github.com/themattrix/bash-concurrent
1•pastage•6m ago•0 comments

Let's compile Quake like it's 1997

https://fabiensanglard.net/compile_like_1997/index.html
1•billiob•7m ago•0 comments

Reverse Engineering Medium.com's Editor: How Copy, Paste, and Images Work

https://app.writtte.com/read/gP0H6W5
1•birdculture•13m ago•0 comments

Go 1.22, SQLite, and Next.js: The "Boring" Back End

https://mohammedeabdelaziz.github.io/articles/go-next-pt-2
1•mohammede•18m ago•0 comments

Laibach the Whistleblowers [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Mx2mxpaCY
1•KnuthIsGod•20m ago•1 comments

Slop News - HN front page right now hallucinated as 100% AI SLOP

https://slop-news.pages.dev/slop-news
1•keepamovin•24m ago•1 comments

Economists vs. Technologists on AI

https://ideasindevelopment.substack.com/p/economists-vs-technologists-on-ai
1•econlmics•26m ago•0 comments

Life at the Edge

https://asadk.com/p/edge
2•tosh•32m ago•0 comments

RISC-V Vector Primer

https://github.com/simplex-micro/riscv-vector-primer/blob/main/index.md
3•oxxoxoxooo•36m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Invoxo – Invoicing with automatic EU VAT for cross-border services

2•InvoxoEU•36m ago•0 comments

A Tale of Two Standards, POSIX and Win32 (2005)

https://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2.html
2•goranmoomin•40m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Is the Downfall of SaaS Started?

3•throwaw12•41m ago•0 comments

Flirt: The Native Backend

https://blog.buenzli.dev/flirt-native-backend/
2•senekor•43m ago•0 comments

OpenAI's Latest Platform Targets Enterprise Customers

https://aibusiness.com/agentic-ai/openai-s-latest-platform-targets-enterprise-customers
1•myk-e•45m ago•0 comments

Goldman Sachs taps Anthropic's Claude to automate accounting, compliance roles

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/06/anthropic-goldman-sachs-ai-model-accounting.html
3•myk-e•48m ago•5 comments

Ai.com bought by Crypto.com founder for $70M in biggest-ever website name deal

https://www.ft.com/content/83488628-8dfd-4060-a7b0-71b1bb012785
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•49m ago•1 comments

Big Tech's AI Push Is Costing More Than the Moon Landing

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-spending-tech-companies-compared-02b90046
4•1vuio0pswjnm7•51m ago•0 comments

The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/02/07/ai-spending-economy-shortages/
2•1vuio0pswjnm7•52m ago•0 comments

Suno, AI Music, and the Bad Future [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8dcFhF0Dlk
1•askl•54m ago•2 comments

Ask HN: How are researchers using AlphaFold in 2026?

1•jocho12•57m ago•0 comments

Running the "Reflections on Trusting Trust" Compiler

https://spawn-queue.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3786614
1•devooops•1h ago•0 comments

Watermark API – $0.01/image, 10x cheaper than Cloudinary

https://api-production-caa8.up.railway.app/docs
1•lembergs•1h ago•1 comments

Now send your marketing campaigns directly from ChatGPT

https://www.mail-o-mail.com/
1•avallark•1h ago•1 comments

Queueing Theory v2: DORA metrics, queue-of-queues, chi-alpha-beta-sigma notation

https://github.com/joelparkerhenderson/queueing-theory
1•jph•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Hibana – choreography-first protocol safety for Rust

https://hibanaworks.dev/
5•o8vm•1h ago•1 comments

Haniri: A live autonomous world where AI agents survive or collapse

https://www.haniri.com
1•donangrey•1h ago•1 comments

GPT-5.3-Codex System Card [pdf]

https://cdn.openai.com/pdf/23eca107-a9b1-4d2c-b156-7deb4fbc697c/GPT-5-3-Codex-System-Card-02.pdf
1•tosh•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

No One Can Explain Why Planes Stay in the Air (2020)

https://www.scientificamerican.com/video/no-one-can-explain-why-planes-stay-in-the-air/
12•Tomte•8mo ago

Comments

gnabgib•8mo ago
Discussion at the time (228 points, 168 comments) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22237528
zabzonk•8mo ago
When I was a kid I used to make small balsa-wood gliders who's wings were completely flat, and with no angle of attack. They flew OK, which has always made me wonder about both Bernoulli and Newton in this regard.
euroderf•8mo ago
Did they fly basically the same when chucked upside-down ?

There's that stabilizer to complicate things.

zabzonk•8mo ago
> Did they fly basically the same when chucked upside-down ?

sadly, never occurred to me to try.

> There's that stabilizer to complicate things.

True, getting the tailplane right is kind of key to a successful aircraft. but these would have been basically the same as the wings. so they may have provided some lift, and so some down-pitch?

nostrademons•8mo ago
I tried, and yes, an inverted balsa-wood glider will still fly. Actually just tried right now with a styrofoam glider, upside-down, and it's fine. Marginally less range than when flying right-side-up, but it's a very small difference.

I suspect that what's going on is that the center-of-gravity interacts with the center-of-lift to create a slight angle of attack regardless of what orientation the plane itself has. Then there is some unknown feedback loop that keeps that angle of attack from getting too large and stalling. It's not unlimited - if you make a paper airplane whose wings are too far forward or center of gravity is too far back, it will still stall - but it keeps most reasonable planes moving forward rather than down.

zabzonk•8mo ago
Yeah, I agree it must have something to do with the forces on the model.

I loved playing with these things way back when (1960s) - the most frightening one was a model attached to a jetex rocket engine https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jetex which after taking off immediately immolated itself, which I suppose is par for rocket powered aircraft, of any size.

gus_massa•8mo ago
> no angle of attack

You probably need to film the plane and nave an accurate horizontal reference to ensure the wing is perfectly horizontal.

(Disclaimer: I only made paper planes, but I never filmed them.)

AStonesThrow•8mo ago
I stopped reading when they accused Nature of being "mindless" and "random". The sheer hubris involved in scientists sniffing their own farts and declaring one another to be the king of knowledge. Disgusting arrogance.

I can conceive of more than a few mindless and random pursuits within Science that would save us a lot of money and heartache, if they were abandoned.

xeonmc•8mo ago
My headcanon is that it’s an interaction between cavitation from the object dragging through the fluid and recoil from the particles flinging off of the surface. If you move fast enough then the momentum imparted by the ram surface onto the molecules are large enough to overcome the external pressure trying to fill the cavitation, so you get boundary layer separation.
tmtvl•8mo ago
Helicopters, on the other hand, we know perfectly well how they fly. They fly by being so ugly gravity rejects them.
bastawhiz•8mo ago
In thinking about it, this implies that by spinning the blades faster, it makes the helicopter more ugly. Finally, we have an objective unit of measure for relative ugliness: RPM!
jaybrendansmith•8mo ago
They fly by falling, then getting distracted, thereby missing the ground.
lolc•8mo ago
Easy, you stay in the air by accelerating air downwards. Physically, you make sure to collide more with air molecules from below than from above. It's called angle of attack and you can experiment with it by sticking your flat hand out of a car window.

In helicopters it's easy to see, in planes people get all magical about it.

jvanderbot•8mo ago
That's not true entirely, in fact the air is forced downward more by the curvature of the wings.
nrds•8mo ago
Which explains the well-known phenomenon that planes cannot fly upside down.
jvanderbot•8mo ago
Well they can't, not by the same mechanism. They can in the same way a wingless missile would, which doesn't generate lift it just turns itself through air.
tekla•8mo ago
This explanation works for a 8 year old as its true enough for their purposes. It's useless at "actually describe whats happening" level.

We get magical about lift because we don't actually understand it and we know we don't understand it.

dleary•8mo ago
I think it's far from useless... Because it helps to focus on what could possibly be happening. It's not "true enough for an 8 year old's purposes", it is the actual truth.

The air is being accelerated downwards by the airplane. Newton's third law. To stay aloft, the airplane has to manufacture a counteracting force to gravity. And the only way to do that is by accelerating something downwards.

So, we can discuss whether or not the curvature of the airfoil matters, or the angle of attack matters, but the simple fact is that a lot of air has to be accelerated downwards somehow for the plane to stay up.

And the more magical descriptions of lift, including the broken Bernoulli airfoil model that was accepted for so long, are easy to discount once you focus on this important fact.

danielschreber•8mo ago
What about stalls?
jvanderbot•8mo ago
The wing is curved to force air downward without the clumsy ruddering effect described in top level comment. That downward force is the newtons law lift. If you go too fast you lose the smooth flow over the wing and you lose lift. Too slow and you don't force enough down to generate enough lift.
lolc•8mo ago
I don't know what it is with people not accepting fluid dynamics. We can simulate wing performance just fine but they want clean formulas and physics just does not oblige. Seems like a them problem, not a physics problem.
AndrewSwift•8mo ago
You can see why planes stay in the air by sticking your hand out a car window.

If you know better contradict me, but:

An inclined flat surface will push air down, creating pressure below, and create an empty area above, creating a partial vacuum pulling up.

Airfoils are used instead of flat surfaces because they eliminate turbulence by creating laminar airflow.

Regular planes are not built for flying upside down and have airfoils optimized for regular flight — the airfoil section we're all familiar with.

At an airshow once, a pilot showed me that on a plane built for acrobatics, the wing section is vertically symmetrical.