Also, Babbage with literal gears. Look up for electromechanical computation.
[1] https://aphyr.com/posts/354-unifying-the-technical-interview
> Like their ship or their bodies, their written language has no forward or backward direction. Linguists call this "nonlinear orthography", which raises the question: Is this how they think?
While the movie explores philosophical questions other than "Arrival" and does a quiet beautiful job at that, actual linguistic experts have helped making it and it has been praised for its accuracy. I suggest you give it a go.
BEFOREHAND: close door, each window & exit; wait until time.
open spellbook, study, read (scan, select, tell us);
write it, print the hex while each watches,
reverse its length, write again;
kill spiders, pop them, chop, split, kill them.
unlink arms, shift, wait & listen (listening, wait),
...
— Anonymous, "Black Perl" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_PerlAnd this idea can probably be applied for any Lisp-like, any stack based language or array language.
With the right structured editor, it could be used for legitimate programming, it might even be more compact and readable at a glance than some code.
For many people, functional languages were a big paradigm shift. For me, not so much — my background is in mathematics and theoretical physics, so the functional way is the default way of doing things. So, for me, the functional approach (be it in JavaScript or Rust) brings comfort rather than enlightenment.
It’s always contextual, based on what you already know. Maybe if someone speaks German natively, PostScript comes more naturally — who knows.
For OO, every serious software engineer should read The Art of the Metaobject Protocol sometime in their lives.
Here's a sample that plays Rock Paper Scissors: https://sunny.garden/@spenc/113870784615196721
It takes some getting used to symbols that can be confused when upside down such as b or brackets (like the symbols for begin/end)
Like others I am curious about doing it for a lisp or Forth
For example, Hildegard von Bingen is a mystic while Heinrich Faust would be considered a sorcerer. The distinction is important as mysticism is considered a holy activity while sorcery is considered to be a profound sin.
Meditation and esoteric study would fall under the realm of mysticism, while things like divination or the dishonest manipulation of belief would be considered sorcery.
anpep•8mo ago
blkhawk•8mo ago
Aeolun•8mo ago
Of course my lifetime has marched on relentlessly since I first saw it.
cardamomo•8mo ago