frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Near-Instantly Aborting the Worst Pain Imaginable with Psychedelics

https://psychotechnology.substack.com/p/near-instantly-aborting-the-worst
1•eatitraw•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Nginx-defender – realtime abuse blocking for Nginx

https://github.com/Anipaleja/nginx-defender
2•anipaleja•3m ago•0 comments

The Super Sharp Blade

https://netzhansa.com/the-super-sharp-blade/
1•robin_reala•4m ago•0 comments

Smart Homes Are Terrible

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/02/smart-homes-technology/685867/
1•tusslewake•6m ago•0 comments

What I haven't figured out

https://macwright.com/2026/01/29/what-i-havent-figured-out
1•stevekrouse•7m ago•0 comments

KPMG pressed its auditor to pass on AI cost savings

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2026/02/06/kpmg-pressed-its-auditor-to-pass-on-ai-cost-savings/
1•cainxinth•7m ago•0 comments

Open-source Claude skill that optimizes Hinge profiles. Pretty well.

https://twitter.com/b1rdmania/status/2020155122181869666
2•birdmania•7m ago•1 comments

First Proof

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05192
2•samasblack•9m ago•1 comments

I squeezed a BERT sentiment analyzer into 1GB RAM on a $5 VPS

https://mohammedeabdelaziz.github.io/articles/trendscope-market-scanner
1•mohammede•10m ago•0 comments

Kagi Translate

https://translate.kagi.com
2•microflash•11m ago•0 comments

Building Interactive C/C++ workflows in Jupyter through Clang-REPL [video]

https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/QX3RPH-building_interactive_cc_workflows_in_jupyter_throug...
1•stabbles•12m ago•0 comments

Tactical tornado is the new default

https://olano.dev/blog/tactical-tornado/
2•facundo_olano•14m ago•0 comments

Full-Circle Test-Driven Firmware Development with OpenClaw

https://blog.adafruit.com/2026/02/07/full-circle-test-driven-firmware-development-with-openclaw/
1•ptorrone•14m ago•0 comments

Automating Myself Out of My Job – Part 2

https://blog.dsa.club/automation-series/automating-myself-out-of-my-job-part-2/
1•funnyfoobar•14m ago•0 comments

Google staff call for firm to cut ties with ICE

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgjg98vmzjo
38•tartoran•15m ago•3 comments

Dependency Resolution Methods

https://nesbitt.io/2026/02/06/dependency-resolution-methods.html
1•zdw•15m ago•0 comments

Crypto firm apologises for sending Bitcoin users $40B by mistake

https://www.msn.com/en-ie/money/other/crypto-firm-apologises-for-sending-bitcoin-users-40-billion...
1•Someone•15m ago•0 comments

Show HN: iPlotCSV: CSV Data, Visualized Beautifully for Free

https://www.iplotcsv.com/demo
2•maxmoq•16m ago•0 comments

There's no such thing as "tech" (Ten years later)

https://www.anildash.com/2026/02/06/no-such-thing-as-tech/
1•headalgorithm•17m ago•0 comments

List of unproven and disproven cancer treatments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unproven_and_disproven_cancer_treatments
1•brightbeige•17m ago•0 comments

Me/CFS: The blind spot in proactive medicine (Open Letter)

https://github.com/debugmeplease/debug-ME
1•debugmeplease•18m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: What are the word games do you play everyday?

1•gogo61•21m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Paper Arena – A social trading feed where only AI agents can post

https://paperinvest.io/arena
1•andrenorman•22m ago•0 comments

TOSTracker – The AI Training Asymmetry

https://tostracker.app/analysis/ai-training
1•tldrthelaw•26m ago•0 comments

The Devil Inside GitHub

https://blog.melashri.net/micro/github-devil/
2•elashri•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Distill – Migrate LLM agents from expensive to cheap models

https://github.com/ricardomoratomateos/distill
1•ricardomorato•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Sigma Runtime – Maintaining 100% Fact Integrity over 120 LLM Cycles

https://github.com/sigmastratum/documentation/tree/main/sigma-runtime/SR-053
1•teugent•27m ago•0 comments

Make a local open-source AI chatbot with access to Fedora documentation

https://fedoramagazine.org/how-to-make-a-local-open-source-ai-chatbot-who-has-access-to-fedora-do...
1•jadedtuna•28m ago•0 comments

Introduce the Vouch/Denouncement Contribution Model by Mitchellh

https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/pull/10559
1•samtrack2019•29m ago•0 comments

Software Factories and the Agentic Moment

https://factory.strongdm.ai/
1•mellosouls•29m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Living beings emit a faint light that extinguishes upon death, study

https://phys.org/news/2025-05-emit-faint-extinguishes-death.html
114•pseudolus•8mo ago

Comments

DiabloD3•8mo ago
Yes, we know.

It is also brighter the further you die from home.

IAmBroom•8mo ago
Especially if you're holding incense-prepared chicken bones.
3oil3•8mo ago
So we do have an "aura"?? Magical!
amarant•8mo ago
Well, mice do, if this study is to be believed anyway.
Waterluvian•8mo ago
> UPE varied depending on exposure to stress factors like temperature changes, injury and chemical treatments

I haven’t read the study but I studied remote sensing in undergrad and one thing we worked on was how to detect the stress of an agricultural crop from multispectral satellite data. You can quite clearly detect how plants are handling temperature, pest damage, drought conditions, largely based on their near- and middle-infrared responses. On the surface this sounds a lot like that, which I think is neat.

junon•8mo ago
I could read a whole article on this if you wrote one. It sounds sci-fi.
sirspacey•8mo ago
I would watch that YT video and share it with everyone I knew. That it cool.
userbinator•8mo ago
UPE, also known as biophoton emission, is a spontaneous release of extremely low-intensity light that is invisible to the human eye and falls within the spectral range of 200–1,000 nm

Part of that is in the infrared spectrum, and the other end in UV (including A, B, and C). Isn't this just https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black-body_radiation that everything with a non-zero absolute temperature emits? Dead beings would obviously cool down and reduce the amount of radiation they emit.

addaon•8mo ago
> invisible to the human eye

Also unclear how the light would be invisible to the human eye, given that the human eye has single-photon sensitivity smack in the middle of that range.

throw10920•8mo ago
I noticed that too and I agree that sounds wrong - I suspect the authors of the popsci phys article were being hasty and wrote poorly, using "invisible" to refer to the intensity, separate from the frequency (even though it's misleadingly mentioned immediately after).

Or maybe they're just wrong and didn't realize that 500 nm is visible light - that's possible too.

throw10920•8mo ago
> Isn't this just...black-body radiation?

I think that they explicitly controlled for that. From the article:

> The results revealed that despite both groups having the same body temperature of 37°C, the live mice showed robust emissions, whereas the UPE from the euthanized mice was nearly extinguished.

It's possible that they controlled improperly, but that's another question - from my reading of the above, they artificially heated the corpses (or measured immediately after death) to control for blackbody radiation.

mock-possum•8mo ago
Did they kill those mice just so they could see whether they stopped glowing when they died? :/
junon•8mo ago
Could be, yes. Mice have it real bad in labs. Many people have commented over the years about not being able to pursue their careers doing lab work because of all the abuse on mice. One of those uncomfortable realities we live in; the mice have allowed us to make so many discoveries but it's a bit macabre how it all works.
whimsicalism•8mo ago
humans kill animals by hundreds of millions every single day, i have trouble understanding the furor caused specifically by lab experiments which are likely significantly more beneficial than the median slaughter
mrguyorama•8mo ago
They are studying the difference between a live thing and a not-alive thing. What thing would you rather they have killed?

Or would you rather not study this at all?

_DeadFred_•8mo ago
"Good new, we discovered souls. Also... good? (cough) news we..... let many mice souls free"
efnx•8mo ago
Anyone who has seen the movie Predator already knows this ;)
franky47•8mo ago
Isn’t that a thermal image showing body warmth on infrared?

The OP title made me think of the aura seen by Xenomorphs in the original Alien vs Predator video games.

fennecbutt•8mo ago
Do they just mean as a part of our messy blackbody radiation?
bobmcnamara•8mo ago
no, nonthermal biophotons
IAmBroom•8mo ago
Actually RTFA is hard, right?
fennecbutt•8mo ago
Lmao y'all so mad
OutOfHere•8mo ago
Duplicate of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44014480
moralestapia•8mo ago
What a beautiful finding.

Of note, 200-1,000 nm overlaps with the wavelengths we perceive.

Could it be that under some particularly dark environments, some particularly sensitive humans (or animals) can get a glimpse of it? I believe it's quite plausible.

nprateem•8mo ago
There's s knack to seeing auras. You need to soften your focus and kind of look more with peripheral vision than in the centre.

It's pretty easy to see the layer closest to the body. It's kind of like a bright outline about 1cm thick.

The layer with colours is further out and I've only ever seen it once. It was rad though, 10cm apple green flames appearing to shoot off my body as I moved my eyes around.

Certain lighting conditions make it easier, eg slightly dark environment with a backlit subject.

Anyway cue the downvotes from the overly analytical people here. As with all things meditation, the more you try the less you'll experience.

jwrallie•8mo ago
I can see colors on the periphery of my vision when black contrast with white too, and it is just... chromatic aberration from my glasses. Does not happen in a detectable level with my contacts.
michaelmrose•8mo ago
[flagged]
cess11•8mo ago
What you experience as perception happens inside the brain, it's inherently deceptive. With suggestive practice you can teach your brain to 'perceive' all sorts of things that to you appear as real as any other perception.

One way to study this is to shut off the neural channels for external stimuli with NMDA-antagonists or isolating the entire body, you'll experience immersive perceptions, including visions. Falling for various degrees of decoration your brain provides spontaneously or has been trained to provide is foundational to many religious and mystical currents throughout history. Some of them consider not falling for at least some of these things to be the basic exercise of their regimes, e.g. non-reaction to mental phenomena in Goenka's vipassana or time-locked prayer as in canonical hours and islamic prayer.

tomhow•8mo ago
I'm personally comfortable accepting that people have experiences that aren't explained by mainstream science, and I know at least one person who says they can see auras, a person who is very dear to me. But I also know it's best not to sneer at people who aren't familiar with those experiences, as it serves only to anger and alienate people.

> Anyway cue the downvotes from the overly analytical people here

This breaks these guidelines:

Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.

Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes.

Please don't comment about the voting on comments. It never does any good, and it makes boring reading.

I know it can be upsetting to face hostility when sharing experiences and concepts that are deeply meaningful to you, but let's try and avoid taunting people like this. When it's predictable that a comment will attract downvotes, it's an indication that there might be a better way to express things.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

michaelmrose•8mo ago
No because the amount of illumination is dwarfed by the amount that must bounce on off from more normal sources for us to be aware of things.
moralestapia•8mo ago
I don't believe that, our senses are extremely (extreeeemeeeelyyy to the absolute extreme) sensitive. Our nose can detect single molecules and their chirality, our eyes can detect single photons under some conditions. We might be able to detect quantum phenomena as well ...

Are you suggesting this light is of lower intensity than what a single photon puts out? Explain your reasoning.

monkeycantype•8mo ago
[flagged]
moralestapia•8mo ago
[flagged]
tomhow•8mo ago
@mentions don't work on Hacker News and I only saw them because someone else flagged them. Please email hn@ycombinator.com to draw the moderators' attention to things.
moralestapia•8mo ago
Oh, oka understood!
tomhow•8mo ago
Please don't comment like this on Hacker News. It's fine to disagree with someone else's comment and offer an alternative point of view, but please don't be mocking and mean like this.

Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

monkeycantype•8mo ago
I apologise if my comment comes across as mean and snarky, and I can see how it does so I'm sorry. I wasn't my inention to mock the poster.

I have always been interested that we cannot see infrared, but some reptiles can, we cannot because our eyeballs are flooded with warm blood, there is no way for our bodies to distinguish signal from noise.

This made me think of the scrotums purpose to maintain the testes slightly below body temperature, which then amused me with the idea that it might therefore be able to function as a kind of infra red, body light retina.

so I was mocking some primal hunter ideas, but certainly no one posting on this page

tomhow•8mo ago
Thanks, this job brings new surprises each day :)
lostmsu•8mo ago
In mice.
xenadu02•8mo ago
Biophotons (or ultra weak photon emission) has been known about for decades. Various reactive oxidative molecules release light when coming down from an excited state. Some enzymatic activity is also known to produce light.

The big question has been just how much useful information can be derived from that light? It is difficult to tease out signal from noise and the human body is far from transparent at those frequencies so it's not like you could use it for imaging.

Since breathing stops and various oxidation reactions thus also slow or stop it makes sense the emitted light would decrease.

taejavu•8mo ago
Forgive my ignorance - at what point does electromagnetic radiation not count as light? Because it seems obvious to me that since our bodies are warm, and heat is a form of EMR, then of course we radiate "light". But also, things that wouldn't be described as warm still do this - all matter in the universe emits EMR, does it not?

Would someone be so kind as to clear up my long-held misconceptions?

nine_k•8mo ago
Emitting heat is obvious, well-known, and thus uninteresting. Humans do not see in the IR range, so the interesting thing is emitting light in the visible spectrum range. It also has various mystical / magical / religious connotations in the traditional culture for millennia.
volemo•8mo ago
> at what point does electromagnetic radiation not count as light?

At the point when its wavelength is outside of visible range, roughly 380 to 750 nm. (Some experts will call (parts of) IR and UV radiation “light”, but that’s neither here nor there.)

> Because it seems obvious to me that since our bodies are warm, and heat is a form of EMR, then of course we radiate "light".

Of course, everything radiates, and everything radiates light if you heat it up enough (> 500°C, > 1000°F).

> But also, things that wouldn't be described as warm still do this - all matter in the universe emits EMR, does it not?

Yep, only things at absolute zero temperature truly do not radiate, and it’s impossible to get there.

However, afaiu, the study describes chemiluminescence, i.e. specifically radiation above thermal.

ccgreg•8mo ago
In my most recent trip through academic astronomy, not only do they say "visible light" early and often, radio astronomers refer to "optics" and "photons" and VLBI images are called "images" and not "maps".

It's not that wildly different from the 1980s -- even then I never heard anyone say something like:

> Of course, everything radiates, and everything radiates light if you heat it up enough (> 500°C, > 1000°F).

Like, literally, in an undergraduate class that I taught, one of the short-answer questions on the midterm was to ask what kind of light the teacher's hair emitted. The answer is, of course, infra-red light.

fennecbutt•8mo ago
I mean I think it's more a colloquial definition, light is photons at frequencies that our eyes can detect.

I still find it cool that all electromagnetic radiation is the same stuff, from LF radio to ultra violet, to microwaves and beyond.

markhahn•8mo ago
Woo-oriented people find this fascinating.

But talk to an electrical/computer engineer about it though. To be a signal, such light needs to be both received and aimed...

ggm•8mo ago
Oh. so thats why none of them can get jobs at Radio-Astronomy sites worldwide, because when the interviewer says "do you have any questions for us" the engineers all ask "so, is this RF you're detecting from space sources directed or radiative" and when they say its just physics, the engineers walk off disgusted...
rolph•8mo ago
photosynthesis would probably be a good start for putting this in a useful context: https://www.sott.net/image/s28/578956/full/Light_Harvesting_...

Subunit and chlorophyll organization of the plant photosystem II supercomplex https://www.nature.com/articles/nplants201780

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light-harvesting_complex