You can build cheaply and efficiently because of economy of scale, and with large scale planning, entire settlements can pop up within 10 years complete with public transport, and amenities.
It really doesn’t have to look bad either. With modern materials, a bit of ornamentation, and greenery it can be a great place to live for hundreds of millions of people.
https://videos.metro.co.uk/video/met/2024/10/29/645142234187...
...regards
Gotta love how in one conversation, Americans will be mocked for living in "cheap McMansions". Then in another, Americans will be mocked for having small houses. Mocked for being rural. Mocked for being suburban. Only urban apartment dwelling bus riders are spared, but even then they are called substandard.
Much of that was due to the fact that communists weren't so bent on squeezing as much value as possible from every square meter of land.
Meanwhile in more modern architecture the (built in 2002) block neighbouring mine is spaced a regulatory-approved 7 metres away - windows facing. My relative lives in an even newer apartment which has windows facing the southwest only. AC becomes a necessity in such circumstances.
I can't recall ever seeing panel blocks where you could peer into your neighbour's apartment like that. In all the instances I can think of both blocks have blank walls there.
Very few people had cars when these houses were built, so parking and car-friendliness wasn’t obviously a priority. With the number of cars these days we have major issues with parking and emergency service accessibility around commie blocks.
Another issue is centralized heating. Problems begin when they start repairing the pipes, going six months without hot water is normal. Insulation is a must, usually done on credit at your own expense.
These buildings are completely lacking in bomb resistance. Of course, there are many types and configurations, for example, I lived in Odessa in some fairly decent panel buildings that were apparently built for a few from the USSR Politburo, so probably elite.
Living underground is hell. It’s better to solve the problem politically with reliable air defense systems. On top of that, terrible high-tech bombs keep getting more advanced and basements could end up costing more than the houses built above them.
The outskirts of Kharkiv are a tragedy, condolences.
noeltock•8mo ago
- who finances? everything goes to war, even post-victory, focus will be on replenishing and criticial infra.
- shelters? only a handful of people with kids go to them
yakshaving_jgt•8mo ago
I suspect the future reconstruction effort is going to involve quite a lot more investment in underground shelters. I don't think Ukraine is going to trust russia for at least the next 100 years. Similar situation to Finland.
troupo•8mo ago
They might start again
vidarh•8mo ago
soco•8mo ago
hagbard_c•8mo ago
[1] https://msbgis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/instant/nearby/index.htm...
[2] https://www.riksbyggen.se/bostad/kopa-bostadsratt/lagar-och-...
xenator•8mo ago
We had them because of Germany.
I spent my childhood in Ukraine.
ulrischa•8mo ago
fluder•8mo ago
The missile flies for 40 seconds, the alarm usually goes off after the explosion.
noeltock•8mo ago