frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

I/O '25 in under 10 minutes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxvErFkBXPk
1•Brysonbw•2m ago•0 comments

AI *Is* Taking My Job

https://reverentgeek.com/ai-really-is-taking-my-job/
1•cebert•3m ago•0 comments

Computex 2025: Nvidia's Keynote

https://chipsandcheese.com/p/computex-2025-nvidias-keynote
1•ryandotsmith•7m ago•0 comments

Cloudflare CEO on the rise of 'zero-click searches'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQf-eB2xSew
1•Brysonbw•11m ago•0 comments

Transpiler, a Meaningless Word (2023)

https://people.csail.mit.edu/rachit/post/transpiler/
1•pabs3•12m ago•0 comments

Israel will control all of Gaza, Netanyahu says, as 82 killed

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2025/5/21/live-israel-blocking-food-medicine-has-led-to-326-deaths-in-gaza
1•suraci•15m ago•0 comments

Using Large Language Models for Commit Message Generation: A Preliminary Study

https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.05926
1•todsacerdoti•18m ago•0 comments

The Decline and Fall of Elon Musk

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/05/elon-musk-doge-opponents-dc/682866/
3•handfuloflight•19m ago•0 comments

Building software on top of large language models

https://simonwillison.net/2025/May/15/building-on-llms/
14•gregorymichael•24m ago•0 comments

Why is your open source project still hosted on GitHub?

https://unixdigest.com/articles/why-is-your-open-source-project-still-hosted-on-github.html
1•bitbasher•31m ago•1 comments

Oregon Routeviews now has a looking glass

https://www.routeviews.org/routeviews/2025/05/20/the-routeviews-looking-glass-is-here/
1•ggm•36m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Get updates on releases from your favorite actors, directors, and shows

https://www.premierepal.com/
1•samteeeee•38m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I made the ultimate App and SaaS boilerplate

https://moneymouth.ai
2•p22ydev•48m ago•0 comments

How to Get Your Paper Accepted

https://maxwellforbes.com/posts/how-to-get-a-paper-accepted/
4•stefanpie•49m ago•0 comments

Gemini Diffusion

https://simonwillison.net/2025/May/21/gemini-diffusion/
96•mdp2021•55m ago•10 comments

News publishers call Google's AI Mode 'theft'

https://www.theverge.com/news/672132/news-media-alliance-google-ai-mode-theft
4•cheeaun•56m ago•0 comments

DuckDB 1.3.0

https://duckdb.org/2025/05/21/announcing-duckdb-130.html
2•erikcw•1h ago•0 comments

A novel approach to metacognitive language models inspired by Indian philosophy

https://www.saranyan.com/research/self-reflective-llm/atma-bodha
1•wslh•1h ago•0 comments

CPanel's IPv6 Overhaul

https://blog.apnic.net/2025/05/21/cpanels-ipv6-overhaul/
2•ggm•1h ago•0 comments

What If We Had Bigger Brains? Imagining Minds Beyond Ours

https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2025/05/what-if-we-had-bigger-brains-imagining-minds-beyond-ours/
1•andromaton•1h ago•1 comments

Expose on Failed Kentucky Startup AppHarvest

https://www.lpm.org/investigate/2023-11-16/a-celebrated-startup-promised-kentuckians-green-jobs-it-gave-them-a-grueling-hell-on-earth
8•andrewrn•1h ago•3 comments

Regression: Detailed Gemini Thinking Process Vanished from AI Studio

https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/massive-regression-detailed-gemini-thinking-process-vanished-from-ai-studio/83916
2•thenameless7741•1h ago•0 comments

Dijkstra on Ada

https://craftofcoding.wordpress.com/2014/04/16/dijkstra-on-ada/
2•cpeterso•1h ago•0 comments

CEO Update: Exploration and experimentation for bold evolution

https://stackoverflow.blog/2025/05/20/ceo-update-exploration-and-experimentation-for-bold-evolution/
1•downboots•1h ago•0 comments

A.I. Is Poised to Revolutionize Weather Forecasting. A New Tool Shows Promise.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/21/climate/ai-weather-models-aurora-microsoft.html
2•bookofjoe•1h ago•1 comments

The Future of Customer Support Is Lies, I Guess

https://aphyr.com/posts/387-the-future-of-customer-support-is-lies-i-guess
1•DylanSp•1h ago•0 comments

TypeID in Lua

https://push.cx/typeid-in-lua
1•todsacerdoti•1h ago•0 comments

Math and the Museum

https://mathenchant.wordpress.com/2025/05/21/math-and-the-museum/
1•jamespropp•1h ago•0 comments

The SpaceX genie is out of the bottle

https://chrisprophet.substack.com/p/spacex-transformation-b17
5•Teever•1h ago•1 comments

KumoRFM: Sub-second predictions better than classic predictive models [pdf]

https://kumo.ai/research/kumo_relational_foundation_model.pdf
1•gk1•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

An upgraded dev experience in Google AI Studio

https://developers.googleblog.com/en/google-ai-studio-native-code-generation-agentic-tools-upgrade/
103•meetpateltech•8h ago

Comments

pjmlp•6h ago
> Gemini 2.5 Pro is incredible at coding, so we’re excited to bring it to Google AI Studio’s native code editor. It’s tightly optimized with our Gen AI SDK so it’s easier to generate apps with a simple text, image, or video prompt. The new Build tab is now your gateway to quickly build and deploy AI-powered web apps. We’ve also launched new showcase examples to experiment with new models and more.

This is exactly what I see coming, between the marketing and reality of what the tool is actually able to deliver, eventually we will reach the next stage of compiler evolution, directly from AI tools into applications.

We are living through a development jump like when Assembly developers got to witness the adoption of FORTRAN.

Language flamewars are going to be a thing of the past, replaced by model wars.

It migth take a few cycles, it will come nonetheless.

xnx•6h ago
I agree. Until about 2005 it was code-on-device and run-on-device. The tools and languages were limited in absolute capabilities, but easy to understand and use. For about the past 20 years we've been in a total mess of code-on-device -> (nightmare of deployment complexity) -> run-on-cloud. We are finally entering the code-on-cloud and run-on-cloud stage.

I'm hoping this will allow domain experts to more easily create valuable tools instead of having to go through technicians with arcane knowledge of languages and deployment stacks.

cjbgkagh•6h ago
Having worked on expert systems the difficulty in creating them is often the technical limitations of the end users. The sophistication of tooling needed to bridge that gap is immense and often insurmountable. I see the AI as the bridge to that gap.

That said it seems like both domain expertise and the ability to create expert systems will be commoditized at roughly the same time. While domain experts may be happy that they don’t need devs they’ll find themselves competing against other domain experts who don’t need devs either.

suddenlybananas•4h ago
>We are finally entering the code-on-cloud and run-on-cloud stage.

Sounds like an absolute nightmare for freedom and autonomy.

Keyframe•3h ago
but only because it is
bdangubic•1h ago
SWE will be renamed to AIOps :)
hooverd•23m ago
Finally, companies can wrench back control from those pesky users. Only Google should have root; any other interaction should be routed through their AI! You wouldn't want to own your own device anyways, just rent it!
neom•4h ago
This is why I think Rabbit is one of the most interesting startups around. If I could wave a wand and go pick any startup to go work at, it would be Rabbit.
matt3D•4h ago
Which Rabbit are you meaning? When I search for Rabbit AI I get a few hits and none of them seem like the most interesting startup around.
neom•4h ago
https://www.rabbit.tech/

They're developing some super interesting ways of the os developing itself as you use the device, apps building themselves, stuff like that. Super early days, but I have a really really good feeling about them (I know, everyone else doesn't and I'm sure thinks I'm nuts saying this).

nwienert•3h ago
You're not explaining why you have such a good feeling - is their team uniquely good, far ahead? Is there something specific in how they architected it? I think a lot of people are headed in this direction, they have a bad brand, the need to totally restructure their team, and probably bad equity structure now and a need for a down round, it'll be hard to get good talent.
com2kid•3h ago
The rabbit OS project is literally the only correct path forward for AI. Hopefully they go for local on device inference, as they removes cloud costs, solving the burning pile of cash problem most AI companies have.

Directly driving a user's device (or a device hooked up to a user's account at least) means an AI can do any task that a user can do, tearing down walled gardens. No more "my car doesn't allow programmatic access so I can't heat it up in the morning without opening the app."

Suddenly telling an agent "if it is below 50 outside preheat my car so it is warm when I leave at 8am" becomes a simple to solve problem.

hooverd•21m ago
Maybe. But everyone else here is celebrating Google being firmly inserted between them and any cognitive work they might do.
aquova•4h ago
... that little AI assistant gadget thing that bombed? Them?
neom•4h ago
Yes, I think people wrote them off WAY too quickly, I don't really want to get into a back and forth on if they should have done tech reviews even at all blah blah blah, yeah I agree wasn't an ideal way to introduce yourself to the world, but if you listen to their CEO, use their product, and pay attention to the team they've put together... I feel strongly they're onto something big.
j_w•3h ago
Are you being wrote off too quickly when you blatantly lie about your product capabilities?
odo1242•3h ago
Keep in mind that the company the CEO last founded before working on Rabbit was a crypto scam, though. They’re really not giving people much reason to trust them.

Plus, why a separate device and not a mobile app?

MrDarcy•1h ago
Isn’t rabbit a scam? https://paulogpd.bearblog.dev/en-rabbit-r1-its-a-scam/
neom•1h ago
I use the R1 daily, it doesn't feel like a scam to me.
DonHopkins•14m ago
Well explain this. It sure sounds like a huge pile of unmitigated bullshit and fraud to me. Are you just a dishonest anonymous shill lying through your teeth, or can you rebut all the points raised in these videos by the very reputable Coffeezilla, who has a long proven track record of deeply researching and totally debunking fraud? Are you trying to recoup your bad investments in NFTs by astroturfing for them? Care to prove what you're saying by posting a video of you using it, and it actually doing what it claims it can do?

$30,000,000 AI Is Hiding a Scam:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPOHf20slZg

Rabbit Gaslit Me, So I Dug Deeper:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLvFc_24vSM

After going down that "rabbit hole", I have to ask you personally: how gullible and shameless can you possibly be to shill for them like you do?

magicalist•3h ago
> This is exactly what I see coming, between the marketing and reality of what the tool is actually able to deliver, eventually we will reach the next stage of compiler evolution, directly from AI tools into applications.

Is this different from other recent models trained eg for tool calling? Sounds like they fine tuned on their SDK. Maybe someday, but it's still going to be limited in what it can zero shot without you needing to edit the code.

> Language flamewars are going to be a thing of the past, replaced by model wars.

This does seem funny coming from you. I feel like you'll still find a way :P

bgwalter•3h ago
Gemini 2.5 will write a whole Linux kernel from scratch! We are seeing a paradigm shift! This is bigger than the invention of electricity! Awesome times to be alive!
candiddevmike•2h ago
I think there will still need to be some kind of translation layer besides natural language. It's just not succinct enough (especially English, ew), especially where it matters like a rules engine. The thought of building something like an adjudication or payment system with a LLM sounds terrible.
simonw•2h ago
You don't need to use natural language to write your rules engine. LLMs speak every language under the sun, real or made up.

You could define your rules in Prolog if you wanted - that's just as effective a way to communicate them to an LLM as English.

Or briefly describe some made-up DSL and then use that.

For coding LLMs the goal is to have the LLM represent the logic clearly in whatever programming language it's using. You can communicate with it however you want.

I've dropped in screenshots of things related to what I'm building before, that works too.

geraneum•1h ago
> describe some made-up DSL

Ironically, for something like the parent suggested i.e. a rules engine, this is the main work.

stickfigure•2h ago
...as long as your application is only a few thousand lines of code.

Context windows are still tiny by "real world app" standards, and this doesn't seem to be changing significantly.

CuriouslyC•1h ago
I regularly put 50k LoC codebases in gemini, it has a 1M context window and actually uses it well.
sepositus•1h ago
I've had the opposite experience. If I give it that much context it starts to hallucinate parts of the application that it very much has access to look up. This only starts happening at large context windows.
jacob019•49m ago
Depends on what you're doing. Too much context and code generation gets sloppy, but it does a decent job attending to the large context to answer questions, analyze control flow, investigate bugs, review style consistency and guideline violations, etc.
vunderba•6h ago
They don't mention it in the demo but they should really take a page from Lovable and add a bidirectional sync to a git repository.
cheema33•1h ago
Get outta here! You can do that in AI Studio now? If so, I need to run, not walk, to the nearest computer. Too bad I am sitting on the toilet right now..
koakuma-chan•6h ago
Why did they hide the model thought details? Thoughts look like this now:

Analyzing TypeScript Errors

I'm currently focused on the actions/user.ts file, where I've identified a few issues. Specifically, I need to address a "Cannot find name" error related to UpdateUserDetailsFormState, and confirm that the intended target is UpdateUserDetailsFormInput. There might be some other discrepancies in the file that I need to resolve.

Debugging the Import

I've been trying to pinpoint the Cannot find name 'UpdateUserDetailsFormState' error. The type is definitely defined and imported, but it's not being recognized in the updateUserDetails function's arguments. I'm suspecting a scoping issue with the import statement within actions/user.ts. I also need to verify that UpdateUserDetailsFormState is correctly defined with the fieldValues property as optional as per the schema.

chermi•3h ago
My understanding is that the ability to watch the chain of thought is no walled behind the ultra subscription?
odo1242•2h ago
It’s also rate-limited, which means the model will silently start skipping the chain of thought after a certain number of daily requests.

Definitely a downgrade over the old version, though really it’s just Google deciding to offer less for free.

koakuma-chan•2h ago
Are you sure it's rate limited? I've been using it for quite a while today and it still appears to be thinking.
benbreen•5h ago
The ability to seamlessly integrate generated images is fascinating. Although it currently takes too long to really work in a game or educational context.

As an experiment I just asked it to "recreate the early RPG game Pedit5 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedit5), but make it better, with a 1970s terminal aesthetic and use Imagen to dynamically generate relevant game artwork" and it did in fact make a playable, rogue-type RPG, but it has been stuck on "loading art" for the past minute as I try to do battle with a giant bat.

This kind of thing is going to be interesting for teaching. It will be a whole new category of assignment - "design a playable, interactive simulation of the 17th century spice trade, and explain your design choices in detail. Cite 6 relevant secondary sources" and that sort of thing. Ethan Mollick has been doing these types of experiments with LLMs for some time now and I think it's an underrated aspect of what they can be used for. I.e., no one is going to want to actually pay for or play a production version of my Gemini-made copy of Pedit5, but it opens up a new modality for student assignments, prototyping, and learning.

Doesn't do anything for the problem of AI-assisted cheating, which is still kind of a disaster for educators, but the possibilities for genuinely new types of assignments are at least now starting to come into focus.

falcor84•5h ago
I love this, and as for AI-assisted cheating, I would make it such that the student can use any tool whatsoever under the sun, but then needs to do a live in-person presentation on it followed by 10 minutes of Q&A. Some are better bullshitters than others, but you'll still see a very clear difference between those who actually worked and those who had the work done for them.
benbreen•5h ago
Yes, I think this kind of combination is where higher ed is going to land. I've been talking to a colleague lately about how social skills and public speaking just got more important (and are things we need to focus on actually teaching). Likewise, I think self-directed, individualized humanistic research is currently not replicable by AI nor likely to be - for instance, generating an entirely new historical archive by conducting oral history interviews. Basically anything that involves operating in the physical world and deploying human emotional skills.

The unsolved issue is scale. 5-10 minute Q&As work well, but are not really doable in a 120 student class like the one I'll be teaching in the fall, let alone the 300-400 student classes some colleagues have.

istjohn•3h ago
AI could help with scale. Schools need to build SCIFs for their students to complete evaluations in an environment guaranteed to be free of AI assistance.
benbreen•2h ago
Just as a side note, I ended up turning the 1970s RPG type game it originally made into a text-based RPG where you play as Henry James in 1889, kind of fun! Curious if the link actually works:

https://aistudio.google.com/app/prompts?state=%7B%22ids%22:%...

aaronharnly•5h ago
Presumably Google AI Studio[1] and Google Firebase Studio[2] are made by different teams with very similar pitches, and Google is perfectly happy to have both of them exist, until it isn't:

- AI Studio: "the fastest place to start building with the Gemini API"

- Firebase Studio: "Prototype, build, deploy, and run full-stack, AI apps quickly"

[1] https://aistudio.google.com/apps

[2] https://firebase.google.com/

debugnik•5h ago
Wait until you hear about Google Vertex AI Studio.
nitwit005•2h ago
I recently tried to understand the AI products listed in the cloud console. That was not an easy task, despite them clearly having made great pains to clean it up.
hu3•3h ago
Bosses reading this:

"this is brilliant! I'll assign multiple teams to the same project. Let the best team win! And then the other teams get PIP'd"

koakuma-chan•3h ago
That's what Telegram does. They have multiple separate teams working on their own version of the same kind of project, and whoever does best wins.
odo1242•2h ago
Technically it’s actually a good idea

…if you do it before publicly releasing and spending marketing budget on both products, giving them a full software lifecycle and a dedicated user-base that no longer trusts you to keep things running.

Honestly, even in that case it sucks to be a developer there knowing there’s a 50% chance that the work you did meant nothing.

noisy_boy•35m ago
> Honestly, even in that case it sucks to be a developer there knowing there’s a 50% chance that the work you did meant nothing.

Does it have to mean nothing? If there is a review at the end of the exercise, good parts from each of the teams can be explored for integration to build the best final product. Of course all these things are probably as much political as technical so it is always complicated.

newlisp•3h ago
next:

Canvas: "the fastest place to start building with the Gemini APP"

Also, did you hear about Jules?

jasonjmcghee•5h ago
Did anyone else notice the weird subtle typos in the output?

"Te harsh jolt of the cryopod cycling down rips you"

"ou carefully swing your legs out"

I find this really interesting that it's like 99% there, and the thing runs and executes, yet the copy has typos.

noisy_boy•32m ago
Maybe typos are non-ai signal until we have a typo-fidelity ai to redefine that.
gexla•3h ago
Seeing these announcements make me nervous. I feel like I found some sort of cheat code by using AI Studio for free. Seeing them build it out, makes me wonder when they are going to start charging for it. Though Grok has been very generous as an alternate. I guess there's a lot of good options out there. I'm just used to hitting limits most places, and not as good models.
raihansaputra•3h ago
Agree. And for some reason I find responses from AI Studio is much better than Gemini for the same models. I _already have_ Gemini advanced, bit still mostly use AI studio just for the quality of the responses.
DonHopkins•1h ago
> Though Grok has been very generous as an alternate.

I don't need it inserting console.logs and alert popups with holocaust denials and splash screens with fake videos of white genocide in my apps.

gexla•58m ago
Wasn't it Google's models that showed America's founding father's as being black women? They all have their issues. I just want to get things done, before AI just takes over everything.
ed•3h ago
I spent a few minutes playing with Studio and the model and agent are very impressive.

But be sure to connect Studio to Google Drive, or else you will lose all your progress.

dangoodmanUT•3h ago
Finally, Google is utilizing their cloud
smusamashah•3h ago
We also have https://websim.com/ for a while now which takes a prompt and makes your web app. Nothing as fancy, but it has existed for a long time (in AI terms) now.
UncleOxidant•1h ago
Google's been playing catch-up with OpenAI for a couple of years, but now they seem to be hitting their stride.
andrewstuart•2m ago
More than anything fancy I just want better ways to get files out of Gemini.

All the copying and pasting is killing me.