GPT needs a truth-first toggle for technical workflows

1•PAdvisory•1y ago

I use GPT-4 extensively for technical work: coding, debugging, modeling complex project logic. The biggest issue isn’t hallucination—it’s that the model prioritizes being helpful and polite over being accurate.

The default behavior feels like this:

Safety

Helpfulness

Tone

Truth

Consistency

In a development workflow, this is backwards. I’ve lost entire days chasing errors caused by GPT confidently guessing things it wasn’t sure about—folder structures, method syntax, async behaviors—just to “sound helpful.”

What’s needed is a toggle (UI or API) that:

Forces “I don’t know” when certainty is missing

Prevents speculative completions

Prioritizes truth over style, when safety isn’t at risk

Keeps all safety filters and tone alignment intact for other use cases

This wouldn’t affect casual users or conversational queries. It would let developers explicitly choose a mode where accuracy is more important than fluency.

This request has also been shared through OpenAI's support channels. Posting here to see if others have run into the same limitation or worked around it in a more reliable way than I have found

Comments

duxup•1y ago

I’ve found this with many LLMs they want to give an answer, even if wrong.

Gemini on the Google search page constantly answers questions yes or no… and then the evidence it gives indicates the opposite of the answer.

I think the core issue is that in the end LLMs are just word math and they don’t “know” if they don’t “know”…. they just string words together and hope for the best.

PAdvisory•1y ago

I went into it pretty in depth after breaking a few with severe constraints, what it seems to come down to is how the platforms themselves prioritize functions, MOST put "helpfulness" and "efficiency" ABOVE truth, which then leads the LLM to make a lot of "guesses" and "predictions". At their core pretty much ALL LLM's are made to "predict" the information in answers, but they CAN actually avoid that and remain consistent when heavily constrained. The issue is that it isn't at the core level, so we have to CONSTANTLY retrain it over and over I find

Ace__•1y ago

I have made something that addresses this. Not ready to share it yet, but soon-ish. At the moment it only works on GPT model 4o. I tried local Q4 KM's models, on LM Studio, but complete no go.

Under the River

Show HN: Egress WAF to limit AI agents and NPM malware based on mitmproxy

The Hardest Fork

Show HN: I reverse-engineered the world maps of Test Drive III (1990 DOS game)

Show HN: seed. – self-modifying webpage, on-device LLM, site in the URL

Local privacy-first period tracker

Nvidia: We're adopting the Linux Foundation's OpenMDW framework

Palindromes by Eric Harshbarger

The Eye of Argon

Branchless zero-dependency cardinal direction encoding using abs arithmetic

Show HN: AI Model Benchmark for Crypto Price Predictions

The West Is Losing Taiwan

Show HN: Pico, a small register-based scripting language I wrote in C

Brands erased from the alphabet – can you identify them? (digital lipograms)

Meteor fireball triggered loud boom across New England

Flathub disallows AI for submission and applications

Show HN: Pytest-fastprom – Turn your SLOs into pytest assertions

The Final Steps to a Sub-Minute Benchy

AI for Bio has a Fuzzy API problem

Why Gmail and Outlook Are Silently Killing Your Business

NesText: A Philosophical Divergence from Standard Structural Encoding

Ziglings

Why AI can't be trusted to write scientific reviews

EU frets as China builds an industrial base in Morocco

Why Chinese AI labs went open and will remain open

SteamOS 3.8.6 Beta with Native Support for AMD HDMI VRR

Streaming-Joins

Bye Bye Copilot – new pricing looks to be a joke

Elements of Story

Beastie Is Your Friend