GPT needs a truth-first toggle for technical workflows

1•PAdvisory•1y ago

I use GPT-4 extensively for technical work: coding, debugging, modeling complex project logic. The biggest issue isn’t hallucination—it’s that the model prioritizes being helpful and polite over being accurate.

The default behavior feels like this:

Safety

Helpfulness

Tone

Truth

Consistency

In a development workflow, this is backwards. I’ve lost entire days chasing errors caused by GPT confidently guessing things it wasn’t sure about—folder structures, method syntax, async behaviors—just to “sound helpful.”

What’s needed is a toggle (UI or API) that:

Forces “I don’t know” when certainty is missing

Prevents speculative completions

Prioritizes truth over style, when safety isn’t at risk

Keeps all safety filters and tone alignment intact for other use cases

This wouldn’t affect casual users or conversational queries. It would let developers explicitly choose a mode where accuracy is more important than fluency.

This request has also been shared through OpenAI's support channels. Posting here to see if others have run into the same limitation or worked around it in a more reliable way than I have found

Comments

duxup•1y ago

I’ve found this with many LLMs they want to give an answer, even if wrong.

Gemini on the Google search page constantly answers questions yes or no… and then the evidence it gives indicates the opposite of the answer.

I think the core issue is that in the end LLMs are just word math and they don’t “know” if they don’t “know”…. they just string words together and hope for the best.

PAdvisory•1y ago

I went into it pretty in depth after breaking a few with severe constraints, what it seems to come down to is how the platforms themselves prioritize functions, MOST put "helpfulness" and "efficiency" ABOVE truth, which then leads the LLM to make a lot of "guesses" and "predictions". At their core pretty much ALL LLM's are made to "predict" the information in answers, but they CAN actually avoid that and remain consistent when heavily constrained. The issue is that it isn't at the core level, so we have to CONSTANTLY retrain it over and over I find

Ace__•1y ago

I have made something that addresses this. Not ready to share it yet, but soon-ish. At the moment it only works on GPT model 4o. I tried local Q4 KM's models, on LM Studio, but complete no go.

It's Time to Ditch Chrome

Apple's iPod Recreation

Data breach targeting Bay Street law firms

From Scroll to Contour: How Map Stopped Being a Picture and Became a Mechanism

Readwise Books: An independent digital-first bookstore

Copper – A minimal low-level programming language with OOP and generics

Making Coinbase Multi-User

Grail's cancer test produces fewer false positives than I expected

October Security Incident

North Korea became a hacking superpower

Nitro – Build static sites in plain Python

Bunny CDN Security Incident

NASA ponders a Hubble servicing mission or a controlled deorbit

BBC licence fee expected to top £200 amid row over 'YouTube tax'

French digital tax may kill VideoLan non-profit

Quantum Algorithms for Beginners

Put AI to Work for You

Moju – Open-source physics auditing for CFD and SciML training data

Tracking 11,709 AI launches on Hacker News

The Gestures We've Forgotten

Rival AI models write an encyclopedia and judge each other blind

China unveils 13-foot robot that can lift a cow

What happened to 145 Nasdaq companies after the $1 warning letter

Microsoft Feedback, Deleted

Language models running locally on hardware that has no business running them

Pentagon tells Europeans to cool their rhetoric on Russia, sources say

CoreWeave: Borrowing to Build the AI Cloud

Eli Lilly scraps phase2 Alzheimer program after drug falls short of expectations

Go 1.24 MPTCP default exposes servers to Linux kernel RCE (CVE-2026-98432)

Inferssd – Run models larger than RAM or VRAM by streaming MoE experts from SSD