GPT needs a truth-first toggle for technical workflows

1•PAdvisory•1y ago

I use GPT-4 extensively for technical work: coding, debugging, modeling complex project logic. The biggest issue isn’t hallucination—it’s that the model prioritizes being helpful and polite over being accurate.

The default behavior feels like this:

Safety

Helpfulness

Tone

Truth

Consistency

In a development workflow, this is backwards. I’ve lost entire days chasing errors caused by GPT confidently guessing things it wasn’t sure about—folder structures, method syntax, async behaviors—just to “sound helpful.”

What’s needed is a toggle (UI or API) that:

Forces “I don’t know” when certainty is missing

Prevents speculative completions

Prioritizes truth over style, when safety isn’t at risk

Keeps all safety filters and tone alignment intact for other use cases

This wouldn’t affect casual users or conversational queries. It would let developers explicitly choose a mode where accuracy is more important than fluency.

This request has also been shared through OpenAI's support channels. Posting here to see if others have run into the same limitation or worked around it in a more reliable way than I have found

Comments

duxup•1y ago

I’ve found this with many LLMs they want to give an answer, even if wrong.

Gemini on the Google search page constantly answers questions yes or no… and then the evidence it gives indicates the opposite of the answer.

I think the core issue is that in the end LLMs are just word math and they don’t “know” if they don’t “know”…. they just string words together and hope for the best.

PAdvisory•1y ago

I went into it pretty in depth after breaking a few with severe constraints, what it seems to come down to is how the platforms themselves prioritize functions, MOST put "helpfulness" and "efficiency" ABOVE truth, which then leads the LLM to make a lot of "guesses" and "predictions". At their core pretty much ALL LLM's are made to "predict" the information in answers, but they CAN actually avoid that and remain consistent when heavily constrained. The issue is that it isn't at the core level, so we have to CONSTANTLY retrain it over and over I find

Ace__•1y ago

I have made something that addresses this. Not ready to share it yet, but soon-ish. At the moment it only works on GPT model 4o. I tried local Q4 KM's models, on LM Studio, but complete no go.

Make Reality Answer [pdf]

Working around dragons with the Lemote Yeeloong laptop and OpenBSD

Alzheimers: The undiscovered country from whose bourn no traveler returns (2007)

AI Realtime Commentator for the World Cup

The Unglamorous Side of Rust Web Development

Ketogenic diets slow melanoma growth in vivo

Improved LLM as a Judge Techniques

GSD – Open-source, local-first task manager built on the Eisenhower matrix

We can't retrain our way out of AI's economic disruption

Ford hired AI and sacked humans. It backfired badly

Monlite – documents, vectors, cache, and job queue in one SQLite file

Bypass Protocol: The NDC Architecture Middleware Trap

Show HN: Git-temp – scratchpad folder for AI agents; doesn't clutter Git status

Deburr Edge Cases Skill: Make coding agents systematize their local code

Yap – free offline voice dictation for Mac/Windows/Linux (Wispr Flow alt)

Powerful Anthropic model, Fable 5, on track to return soon

An argument with Om about Wired spawned this newsletter. RIP brother

Marfa Public Radio Puts You to Sleep

A Man Who Invented a Surgery to Cure Himself

Direct observation of the superallowed α-decay of 104Te

What Barbarians Like to Take Private

US Layoffs Skyrocket to Highest Level Since Pandemic AI Blamed for 40% of Cuts

Almost always look on the bright side of life

After 80 Years, Mathematicians Give Famed 'Erdős Method' an Upgrade

Grantham Warns U.S. Stocks Could Plunge 70% / Most Expensive Market in History

Feds Killed Polestar and Spared Volvo. That Should Terrify You

I built a 100% local network privacy appliance to stop smart home spying

China Has Matched Anthropic in Cybersecurity, Resetting AI Race

What Happens When You Run 10k Concurrent Lambda Functions Against DynamoDB

Amble One