GPT needs a truth-first toggle for technical workflows

1•PAdvisory•1y ago

I use GPT-4 extensively for technical work: coding, debugging, modeling complex project logic. The biggest issue isn’t hallucination—it’s that the model prioritizes being helpful and polite over being accurate.

The default behavior feels like this:

Safety

Helpfulness

Tone

Truth

Consistency

In a development workflow, this is backwards. I’ve lost entire days chasing errors caused by GPT confidently guessing things it wasn’t sure about—folder structures, method syntax, async behaviors—just to “sound helpful.”

What’s needed is a toggle (UI or API) that:

Forces “I don’t know” when certainty is missing

Prevents speculative completions

Prioritizes truth over style, when safety isn’t at risk

Keeps all safety filters and tone alignment intact for other use cases

This wouldn’t affect casual users or conversational queries. It would let developers explicitly choose a mode where accuracy is more important than fluency.

This request has also been shared through OpenAI's support channels. Posting here to see if others have run into the same limitation or worked around it in a more reliable way than I have found

Comments

duxup•1y ago

I’ve found this with many LLMs they want to give an answer, even if wrong.

Gemini on the Google search page constantly answers questions yes or no… and then the evidence it gives indicates the opposite of the answer.

I think the core issue is that in the end LLMs are just word math and they don’t “know” if they don’t “know”…. they just string words together and hope for the best.

PAdvisory•1y ago

I went into it pretty in depth after breaking a few with severe constraints, what it seems to come down to is how the platforms themselves prioritize functions, MOST put "helpfulness" and "efficiency" ABOVE truth, which then leads the LLM to make a lot of "guesses" and "predictions". At their core pretty much ALL LLM's are made to "predict" the information in answers, but they CAN actually avoid that and remain consistent when heavily constrained. The issue is that it isn't at the core level, so we have to CONSTANTLY retrain it over and over I find

Ace__•1y ago

I have made something that addresses this. Not ready to share it yet, but soon-ish. At the moment it only works on GPT model 4o. I tried local Q4 KM's models, on LM Studio, but complete no go.

We Let AI Agents Rewrite a 92M-Message-a-Day Service in Go

Rui Ueyama: "We are rewriting the mold linker in Rust"

BitCards – Computer Ads from the Past

Xbot.team – Read a Grok Bot's spec without opening the app

Can we stop AI from deceiving us?

Formatting as Courtesy to the Reader

Introduction to the NT kernel development (Part 1)

Americans Still Skeptical That UFOs Are Aliens

The Meaning of Liff

AI Orchestrator that self-learns, run's teams and never sleeps

Verba: Learn a language by talking to an AI never touches the internet

Inside Colombia's Cocaine Factories

Shein is a global slavery company masquerading as an e-commerce platform

Show HN: I built a live stream site where every spot is instantly AI-generated

DuckDB Runs Recursive CTEs Faster

Nix Is Right. Its Cost Is Not

Raindrops are tiny lightning bolts, and they're corroding cars, study finds

Initial USB4/Thunderbolt Support for Apple M1/M2/M3 SoCs

Why the Way We Append Data to LLM Is Killing Our Cache and Model Attention

Claude, Codex, and Hermes installed unowned code inside corporate networks

I Tried Every AI Browser, Then Went Back to Safari

Solaris

Londoners Are Stewing over Supercar Tourists Who Park Wherever They Want

But where does taste come from?

FakeLinux: Run unmodified Linux binaries on macOS

Satellite connectivity on a €400 open-source industrial datalogger

AnkiDroid: Google Play no longer allowing Open Collective donation link

Anthropic Signs $35B Cloud Deal Backed by Nvidia

Computer use on GNOME Wayland, on a second desktop you never see (for Agents)

Chinese reasoning models match the best on 4 of 5 benchmarks at 40x lower cost