Contacts let you see in the dark with your eyes closed

https://scitechdaily.com/from-sci-fi-to-superpower-these-contacts-let-you-see-in-the-dark-with-your-eyes-closed/

108•geox•8mo ago

Comments

bn-l•8mo ago

Very cool but:

> Currently, the contact lenses are only able to detect infrared radiation projected from an LED light source, but the researchers are working to increase the nanoparticles’ sensitivity so that they can detect lower levels of infrared light.

> “There are many potential applications right away for this material. For example, flickering infrared light could be used to transmit information in security, rescue, encryption or anti-counterfeiting settings.”

Hmm

snitch182•8mo ago

Good. I remember a certain video camera operating in the infrared fringe of the visible spectrum. You could see through light clothes. We do not want that again. At all.

magicalhippo•8mo ago

All, or at least nearly all, digital camera sensors are sensitive in the IR. That's why most "normal" digital cameras have IR blocking filters. Security and astrophoto cameras have the filter removed. For astro there's also people who remove the filter manually[1].

[1]: https://camerasnipe.com/how-to-remove-the-ir-filter-from-a-d...

NBJack•8mo ago

That link is kind of a fever dream of information a little ways in. Are you sure you meant to post that?

"First, remove the smartphone camera’s infrared filter as a whiteboard is on the floor. The beginning of the CCD chip is the scar we need to eliminate. Enter the IRF address, and use a hot air gun to remove it and your piece."?

magicalhippo•8mo ago

Thanks for the catch. Was on the phone and in a hurry so didn't read the whole thing carefully, just several sections which looked ok.

Several passages that do not make much sense, looks like weird translation errors or something. Sorry about that.

Here's a proper guide[1] also with some sample post-conversion pictures. Though the specifics do vary from model to model so if you want to try make sure you find a suitable one, LifePixel has a collection[2] of model-specific tutorials for example.

[1]: https://petapixel.com/2014/09/19/in-depth-diy-eos-550d-infra...

[2]: https://www.lifepixel.com/tutorials/infrared-diy-tutorials

baxtr•8mo ago

> In humans, the infrared contact lenses enabled participants to accurately detect flashing morse code-like signals and to perceive the direction of incoming infrared light. “It’s totally clear cut: without the contact lenses, the subject cannot see anything, but when they put them on, they can clearly see the flickering of the infrared light,” said Xue.

Sounds like promising tech but that’s not "seeing in the dark", yet.

Terr_•8mo ago

I wonder if similarly-lackluster results could be achieved by special facepaint.

Kind of like how when you're camping, you can shield your eyes and still know where the campfire is.

rawling•8mo ago

Several recent posts, think this one has the most discussion:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44063051

M95D•8mo ago

Light in visible spectrum is emitted by the contact lenses. There can be no optical focusing for that light. No image formation on the retina. That means the user may see that there is IR light somewhere around, possibly the general direction where it's coming from (left vs right), but that's all. No IR image, not even general shapes.

itishappy•8mo ago

I noticed the same thing, and while the article comments on it, I suspect the comments may be inaccurate:

> Because the contact lenses have limited ability to capture fine details (due to their close proximity to the retina, which causes the converted light particles to scatter), the team also developed a wearable glass system using the same nanoparticle technology, which enabled participants to perceive higher-resolution infrared information.

No, putting the contact closer to the retina would improve imaging, because it would have less distance to scatter. Glasses will not fix this. A potential solution would be implanting these nanoparticles directly above the retina, but that's a significantly more invasive option than what's being described here.

M95D•8mo ago

Well, you could even put them behind the retina. The photoreceptors of the retina are all upside-down, facing the back of the eye.

itishappy•8mo ago

All the benefits with few of the downsides. That's pretty clever!

amelius•8mo ago

You can also focus a pixel by guiding it through a narrow tube, basically cutting off any out-of-focus light. Maybe they use meta-materials to do it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamaterial

hn_throwaway_99•8mo ago

Yeah, the research is interesting, but the headline is, as usual, bs clickbait, also known as "false".

The article also mentions at the end that the contacts are only sensitive enough to detect IR emitted by an LED - they're not sensitive enough to "see" ambient IR. A far cry from "Contacts let you see in the dark with your eyes closed".

constantcrying•8mo ago

You do not "see" in the dark with these lenses in any meaningful way. They just light up in the visible spectrum when infrared light is shone on them.

anticensor•8mo ago

The true solution would be IR, cyan and UVB cones.

harvey9•8mo ago

If it works then this is the product Bob Shaw described in A Wreath of Stars.

Caelus9•8mo ago

if these contact lenses allow you to see better even when your eyes are closed, could this technology be used to help people who are blind or visually impaired? If so, that would be an absolutely incredible project! The potential for improving lives would be huge.

Neomacs: Rewriting the Emacs display engine in Rust with GPU rendering via wgpu

Show HN: Moli P2P – An ephemeral, serverless image gallery (Rust and WebRTC)

How I grow my X presence?

What's the cost of the most expensive Super Bowl ad slot?

What if you just did a startup instead?

Hacking up your own shell completion (2020)

Show HN: Gorse 0.5 – Open-source recommender system with visual workflow editor

GLM-OCR: Accurate × Fast × Comprehensive

Local Agent Bench: Test 11 small LLMs on tool-calling judgment, on CPU, no GPU

Show HN: AboutMyProject – A public log for developer proof-of-work

Expertise, AI and Work of Future [video]

So Long to Cheap Books You Could Fit in Your Pocket

PID Controller

SpaceX Rocket Generates 100GW of Power, or 20% of US Electricity

Kubernetes MCP Server

I Built a Movie Recommendation Agent to Solve Movie Nights with My Wife

What were the first animals? The fierce sponge–jelly battle that just won't end

Sidestepping Evaluation Awareness and Anticipating Misalignment

OldMapsOnline

What It's Like to Be a Worm

Don't go to physics grad school and other cautionary tales

Lawyer sets new standard for abuse of AI; judge tosses case

AI anxiety batters software execs, costing them combined $62B: report

Bogus Pipeline

Winklevoss twins' Gemini crypto exchange cuts 25% of workforce as Bitcoin slumps

How AI Is Reshaping Human Reasoning and the Rise of Cognitive Surrender

Cycling in France

Ask HN: What breaks in cross-border healthcare coordination?

Show HN: Simple – a bytecode VM and language stack I built with AI

Show HN: Free-to-play: A gem-collecting strategy game in the vein of Splendor