It’s called Maestro heres the whitepaper https://github.com/d3fq0n1/maestro-orchestrator (Narrative version here: https://defqon1.substack.com/p/maestro-a-framework-for-coher...)
Core ideas:
Prompts are dispatched to multiple LLMs (e.g., GPT-4, Claude, open-source models)
The system compares their outputs and synthesizes them
It never resolves into a single voice — it ends with a 66% rule: 2 votes for a primary output, 1 dissent preserved
Human critics and analog verifiers can be triggered for physical-world confirmation (when claims demand grounding)
The feedback loop learns not only from right/wrong outputs, but from what kind of disagreements lead to deeper truth
Maestro isn’t a product or API — it’s a proposal for an open, civic layer of synthetic intelligence. It’s designed for epistemic integrity and resistance to centralized control.
Would love thoughts, critiques, or collaborators.
Yusefmosiah•8mo ago
Getting the UX to work well enough is a major challenge. I’m redesigning that currently, as I got negative feedback from early testers on my initial experimental UX. There’s a balance to be struck between giving users a low latency response, giving the models time to work together and call tools, and not overloading the user with too much information.