frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Hot Reloading in Rust? Subsecond and Dioxus to the Rescue

https://codethoughts.io/posts/2026-02-07-rust-hot-reloading/
1•Tehnix•16s ago•0 comments

Skim – vibe review your PRs

https://github.com/Haizzz/skim
1•haizzz•1m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Open-source AI assistant for interview reasoning

https://github.com/evinjohnn/natively-cluely-ai-assistant
1•Nive11•2m ago•1 comments

Tech Edge: A Living Playbook for America's Technology Long Game

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2026-01/260120_EST_Tech_Edge_0.pdf?Version...
1•hunglee2•5m ago•0 comments

Golden Cross vs. Death Cross: Crypto Trading Guide

https://chartscout.io/golden-cross-vs-death-cross-crypto-trading-guide
1•chartscout•8m ago•0 comments

Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

https://www.spritely.institute/hoot/
2•AlexeyBrin•11m ago•0 comments

What the longevity experts don't tell you

https://machielreyneke.com/blog/longevity-lessons/
1•machielrey•12m ago•1 comments

Monzo wrongly denied refunds to fraud and scam victims

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2026/feb/07/monzo-natwest-hsbc-refunds-fraud-scam-fos-ombudsman
3•tablets•17m ago•0 comments

They were drawn to Korea with dreams of K-pop stardom – but then let down

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgnq9rwyqno
2•breve•19m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI-Powered Merchant Intelligence

https://nodee.co
1•jjkirsch•21m ago•0 comments

Bash parallel tasks and error handling

https://github.com/themattrix/bash-concurrent
2•pastage•21m ago•0 comments

Let's compile Quake like it's 1997

https://fabiensanglard.net/compile_like_1997/index.html
2•billiob•22m ago•0 comments

Reverse Engineering Medium.com's Editor: How Copy, Paste, and Images Work

https://app.writtte.com/read/gP0H6W5
2•birdculture•28m ago•0 comments

Go 1.22, SQLite, and Next.js: The "Boring" Back End

https://mohammedeabdelaziz.github.io/articles/go-next-pt-2
1•mohammede•33m ago•0 comments

Laibach the Whistleblowers [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Mx2mxpaCY
1•KnuthIsGod•35m ago•1 comments

Slop News - HN front page right now as AI slop

https://slop-news.pages.dev/slop-news
1•keepamovin•39m ago•1 comments

Economists vs. Technologists on AI

https://ideasindevelopment.substack.com/p/economists-vs-technologists-on-ai
1•econlmics•41m ago•0 comments

Life at the Edge

https://asadk.com/p/edge
3•tosh•47m ago•0 comments

RISC-V Vector Primer

https://github.com/simplex-micro/riscv-vector-primer/blob/main/index.md
4•oxxoxoxooo•51m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Invoxo – Invoicing with automatic EU VAT for cross-border services

2•InvoxoEU•51m ago•0 comments

A Tale of Two Standards, POSIX and Win32 (2005)

https://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2.html
3•goranmoomin•55m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Is the Downfall of SaaS Started?

3•throwaw12•56m ago•0 comments

Flirt: The Native Backend

https://blog.buenzli.dev/flirt-native-backend/
2•senekor•58m ago•0 comments

OpenAI's Latest Platform Targets Enterprise Customers

https://aibusiness.com/agentic-ai/openai-s-latest-platform-targets-enterprise-customers
1•myk-e•1h ago•0 comments

Goldman Sachs taps Anthropic's Claude to automate accounting, compliance roles

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/06/anthropic-goldman-sachs-ai-model-accounting.html
4•myk-e•1h ago•5 comments

Ai.com bought by Crypto.com founder for $70M in biggest-ever website name deal

https://www.ft.com/content/83488628-8dfd-4060-a7b0-71b1bb012785
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•1h ago•1 comments

Big Tech's AI Push Is Costing More Than the Moon Landing

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-spending-tech-companies-compared-02b90046
5•1vuio0pswjnm7•1h ago•0 comments

The AI boom is causing shortages everywhere else

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/02/07/ai-spending-economy-shortages/
4•1vuio0pswjnm7•1h ago•0 comments

Suno, AI Music, and the Bad Future [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8dcFhF0Dlk
1•askl•1h ago•2 comments

Ask HN: How are researchers using AlphaFold in 2026?

1•jocho12•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Ask HN: Why that many more US-based companies are hiring "US-only" remote?

19•soneca•8mo ago
I recently got laid off and was going through the latest "Who is hiring".

I noticed that about 90% (guessing) of US-based companies that hire remote are hiring "(US only)".

I know there are plenty good reasons for a US company to hire US-only, I am only surprised because a few years ago (when I last was searching for a job), that was definitely not the case. "US-only" was the exception, not the rule. At least in the universe of companies that post on "Who is hiring".

What prompted the change?

Comments

walterbell•8mo ago
Among other reasons, 2022 Section 174 tax changes require 15 years of depreciation for non-US software engineering ("R&D") expenses, vs 5 years for US workers, https://hn.algolia.com/?query=Section%20174. There's currently a proposal in Congress to restore US R&D tech worker salary depreciation to one year, for the 2026-2030 period.
muzani•8mo ago
What does this mean in practice? Wouldn't companies just jump through the bureaucratic hoop to hire people for a third of the prices?
walterbell•8mo ago
Does the company in question have cash flow for 15 years of advance tax payments?
paulcole•8mo ago
If someone in the US is 3x the price does the company in question have cash flow for 5 years of advance tax payments?
walterbell•8mo ago
If they are a startup on the "Who's Hiring" page, that depends on whether they have US investors.
paulcole•8mo ago
Huh?
csomar•8mo ago
You can't legally hire someone else not currently in the US or at least has a US-work permit and thus can be legally hired in the US and made a resident in some state. It used to be that the law turned a blind eye about this but now that's not the case.

You can Deel these employees but you can only transfer money abroad long enough till you realize that the only way to do it fully legally is to create a foreign entity in the foreign country and hire the employee through it. Might work for a particular and unique talent but it doesn't scale.

The US system is now hostile for "globally" distributed teams.

thuanao•8mo ago
They’re hired through outsourcing firms. The company pays the outsourcing firm as a subcontractor. It’s quite common, even amongst the Silicon Valley startups I work with.

My experience is that outsourcing has only accelerated since Covid made remote work commonplace. It never used to be a thing amongst trendy startups.

quacksilver•8mo ago
I 'work' remotely for a US company from abroad regularly. I have no connection to the US.

I own a corporation and it is a B2B outsourcing arrangement rather than an employee though.

I don't get the same rights as an employee, but am fine with that as they are paying me and I am voluntarily providing the work.

I am surprised more people don't try that arrangement as I have seen nothing to suggest there are problems with it so far. I just needed to get an EIN, file 8832 as I have a single member foreign corporation then fill in a W-8BEN-E and protectively file 1120-F and 8833 every year.

csomar•8mo ago
While this is flying under the radar, this is not legal in pretty much all jurisdictions. You are an employee and using a company to contract services. It is not legal even if you were both based in the same country.
sbacic•8mo ago
Not quite. Disguised employment is a pretty specific and (usually) clear-cut issue with well defined criteria. The problems start when a jurisdiction broadens the definition to include whatever they want because they want to capture more tax revenue.

IANAL, but I've been freelancing for years and had a similar thing come up. In the end I was found compliant with the law, ie: not in disguised employment.

quacksilver•8mo ago
I am not technically an employee - I get given a project and agree to complete milestones for payment. I supply my own tools and take on any risks that it won't be delivered or stuff will break. I carry my own insurance. I could hire other people to do the work if they passed my client's background check requirements and signed the NDAs.

I have a few different clients who I do work for and actively market my services.

enceladus06•8mo ago
W-8BEN and don't worry about it, there are larger problems tbh. Or if you can use it for tax minimization hire internally.
scarface_74•8mo ago
Why hire internationally when you can hire someone remotely from the MiddleOfNowhere South Dakota that will happily work for peanuts and not have to deal with tax issues, time zones, etc?

Besides every opening for any remote job gets hundreds of applications within 24 hours. Most companies only need good enough CRUD developers. The market is flooded with unemployed “full stack developers”

itake•8mo ago
As others have touched on, the legality of workers rights is very complex.

Companies don't want to learn and create the proper legal structures and compliance practices just to hire 1-2 people in that country.

Foreign countries have different holidays, worker protections, parental leave, taxes, etc. that companies just don't want to deal with. Some countries make it a huge mess paying someone in equity/options (see China).

registeredcorn•8mo ago
Depending on the circumstances, one of the reasons why may come down to certain regulations outlined by CIFUS[1] or similar inter-government agencies.

I realize you're talking more about individuals, not necessarily who owns a company, but if we were to suppose that a non-US citizen were to become an employee of a company which works on some specific field ("critical technologies, infrastructure, sensitive data, and specific real estate deals") and that foreign employee was promoted to higher and higher roles, eventually being put into a position to hire other people from their country, that might trigger automatic CIFUS oversight review.

It's not enough to simply have a company deemed as critical to be US-based; if the majority of its workforce is foreign nationals, that is a security (and economic) concern for the entire nation, and will come to attention of the US Government.

Dealing with any US government bureaucracy is exhausting, but dealing with US government bureaucracy as it relates to national security is an entirely different beast.

I also realize that "90% of US-based companies" might not currently fall under CIFUS oversight, but if a company expands or pivots into new markets, I would assume that the vast majority of US CEOs would not want to lose out on the opportunity to win an sweet Government contract - that would limit future growth.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Committee_on_Foreign_Investmen...

TheCapeGreek•8mo ago
UK has started doing it too.

EU I've seen is still friendly to timezone alignment instead of regional, but seems to just be less aware at all that people outside of EU might want to apply.

The remote hype has died down, political winds have changed, and in some cases regulations tightened around hiring locally first before trying to find contractors abroad (since you can't employ people directly as explained by others in this thread).

jamesgill•8mo ago
Time zone differential, at least at my (large) employer.
FajitaNachos•8mo ago
Timezones are hard.