> the decision appears to have been made because Isaacman was not politically loyal enough to the Trump Administration

That’s all it is with this administration, Trump first, anything else last.

The article neglects to mention that Isaacman, a payments-processor billionaire, recently gifted or bribed $2 million to the President (which makes this decision even more perplexing).

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2025/tru... ("Meet the top donors to Trump’s $239 million inauguration fund")

Too much competence, too little loyalty.