frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Anthropic: Latest Claude model finds more than 500 vulnerabilities

https://www.scworld.com/news/anthropic-latest-claude-model-finds-more-than-500-vulnerabilities
1•Bender•3m ago•0 comments

Brooklyn cemetery plans human composting option, stirring interest and debate

https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/brooklyn-green-wood-cemetery-human-composting/
1•geox•3m ago•0 comments

Why the 'Strivers' Are Right

https://greyenlightenment.com/2026/02/03/the-strivers-were-right-all-along/
1•paulpauper•4m ago•0 comments

Brain Dumps as a Literary Form

https://davegriffith.substack.com/p/brain-dumps-as-a-literary-form
1•gmays•4m ago•0 comments

Agentic Coding and the Problem of Oracles

https://epkconsulting.substack.com/p/agentic-coding-and-the-problem-of
1•qingsworkshop•5m ago•0 comments

Malicious packages for dYdX cryptocurrency exchange empties user wallets

https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/02/malicious-packages-for-dydx-cryptocurrency-exchange-empt...
1•Bender•5m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I built a <400ms latency voice agent that runs on a 4gb vram GTX 1650"

https://github.com/pheonix-delta/axiom-voice-agent
1•shubham-coder•6m ago•0 comments

Penisgate erupts at Olympics; scandal exposes risks of bulking your bulge

https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/02/penisgate-erupts-at-olympics-scandal-exposes-risks-of-bulk...
2•Bender•6m ago•0 comments

Arcan Explained: A browser for different webs

https://arcan-fe.com/2026/01/26/arcan-explained-a-browser-for-different-webs/
1•fanf2•8m ago•0 comments

What did we learn from the AI Village in 2025?

https://theaidigest.org/village/blog/what-we-learned-2025
1•mrkO99•8m ago•0 comments

An open replacement for the IBM 3174 Establishment Controller

https://github.com/lowobservable/oec
1•bri3d•11m ago•0 comments

The P in PGP isn't for pain: encrypting emails in the browser

https://ckardaris.github.io/blog/2026/02/07/encrypted-email.html
2•ckardaris•13m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Mirror Parliament where users vote on top of politicians and draft laws

https://github.com/fokdelafons/lustra
1•fokdelafons•13m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Opus 4.6 ignoring instructions, how to use 4.5 in Claude Code instead?

1•Chance-Device•15m ago•0 comments

We Mourn Our Craft

https://nolanlawson.com/2026/02/07/we-mourn-our-craft/
1•ColinWright•18m ago•0 comments

Jim Fan calls pixels the ultimate motor controller

https://robotsandstartups.substack.com/p/humanoids-platform-urdf-kitchen-nvidias
1•robotlaunch•21m ago•0 comments

Exploring a Modern SMTPE 2110 Broadcast Truck with My Dad

https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/exploring-a-modern-smpte-2110-broadcast-truck-with-my-dad/
1•HotGarbage•21m ago•0 comments

AI UX Playground: Real-world examples of AI interaction design

https://www.aiuxplayground.com/
1•javiercr•22m ago•0 comments

The Field Guide to Design Futures

https://designfutures.guide/
1•andyjohnson0•23m ago•0 comments

The Other Leverage in Software and AI

https://tomtunguz.com/the-other-leverage-in-software-and-ai/
1•gmays•24m ago•0 comments

AUR malware scanner written in Rust

https://github.com/Sohimaster/traur
3•sohimaster•27m ago•1 comments

Free FFmpeg API [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6RAuSVa4MLI
3•harshalone•27m ago•1 comments

Are AI agents ready for the workplace? A new benchmark raises doubts

https://techcrunch.com/2026/01/22/are-ai-agents-ready-for-the-workplace-a-new-benchmark-raises-do...
2•PaulHoule•32m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI Watermark and Stego Scanner

https://ulrischa.github.io/AIWatermarkDetector/
1•ulrischa•32m ago•0 comments

Clarity vs. complexity: the invisible work of subtraction

https://www.alexscamp.com/p/clarity-vs-complexity-the-invisible
1•dovhyi•33m ago•0 comments

Solid-State Freezer Needs No Refrigerants

https://spectrum.ieee.org/subzero-elastocaloric-cooling
2•Brajeshwar•34m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Will LLMs/AI Decrease Human Intelligence and Make Expertise a Commodity?

1•mc-0•35m ago•1 comments

From Zero to Hero: A Brief Introduction to Spring Boot

https://jcob-sikorski.github.io/me/writing/from-zero-to-hello-world-spring-boot
1•jcob_sikorski•35m ago•1 comments

NSA detected phone call between foreign intelligence and person close to Trump

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/07/nsa-foreign-intelligence-trump-whistleblower
14•c420•36m ago•2 comments

How to Fake a Robotics Result

https://itcanthink.substack.com/p/how-to-fake-a-robotics-result
1•ai_critic•36m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Show HN: I built a tool to review my teammates' pull requests faster

https://gitreviewed.com
1•edai-•8mo ago
Hi HN,

I’m Valentin, a developer who’s found code reviews to be a slow process, especially after context switching or juggling different projects and languages. Even reviewing my own code can be tough when I’ve lost the thread or just need a fresh perspective.

Over the past few weekends, I built GitReviewed to make PR reviews faster, smarter, and genuinely useful for real teams.

What it does:

- Reviews any GitHub or GitLab pull/merge request with AI-powered comments, spotting security issues, code patterns, typos, and more

- Posts comments as you (not a bot), so feedback fits naturally into your workflow

- Lets you tweak the feedback’s tone and detail level to match your team’s style

- Neat trick: Just swap github.com or gitlab.com for gitreviewed.com in any PR/MR URL to jump straight to an instant review

This is my first SaaS project, so I’d really appreciate any feedback, suggestions, or advice from anyone who’s been down this road.

I’ll be around in the comments! Thanks for checking it out!

Comments

fjfaase•8mo ago
Code reviews take a lot of time and delay intergration. As an alternative, you could do away with them to just do all commits on a single branch. That is the ultimate form of Continuous Intergration. As a developer you can do work on your own 'private' branch before merging to the main branch and having a tool to review your own code changes would be usefull.
edai-•8mo ago
Appreciate the comment! You’re right, merging straight to main works for some teams. But in companies I’ve worked at, peer review is required and the process can definitely slow things down (whether it’s policy or just the team culture).

That’s actually one of the idea behind this tool: helping you review your own code before merging. In fact, I used it to review my own code while building this project

pin-yi•8mo ago
This is super useful—well done! Code reviews can easily become a bottleneck, especially when juggling multiple projects or switching contexts. I really like your approach of using AI to generate human-like comments—it feels like a natural part of the workflow rather than an interruption.
edai-•8mo ago
Thank you, I really appreciate the kind words!
mmarian•8mo ago
What's the benefit of using this vs GitHub's own PR copilot? Also, I think you'll struggle with the pricing structure - too low for individual devs to bother using. And no larger companies will be open to let you access their private repos, so you have to cater to individuals at first (or open source).
edai-•8mo ago
Great questions, thanks for the thoughtful feedback!

On Copilot PR reviews: GitReviewed works for both GitHub and GitLab (with plans to add Bitbucket and Azure DevOps), and lets you fully customize the review tone and style. Comments are posted as you, not a bot, so reviews feel natural and human. The goal is to make reviews faster and more helpful for real workflows. I believe peer reviews will still be around for a time.

Pricing: Finding the right price point is definitely a challenge for me. I wanted to keep it accessible for individuals and small teams, but I’m open to adjusting the structure as I get more feedback.

On company trust: Absolutely, larger companies have mentioned being cautious with new SaaS tools like mine. For now, I’m focusing on individual devs and keeping things as transparent as possible regarding permissions and data.

GitReviewed works with your own PAT (for GitHub), GitHub OAuth or GitLab OAuth, so it only accesses what you can see - no extra permissions required. You can review PRs as if you were doing it yourself on their UI, without granting full repo access. Only GitHub OAuth (not PAT) requests broader permissions, while I give the choice to the user to keep this way or PAT way.

Thanks again, this kind of feedback is super helpful as I keep improving things!