frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

OpenClaw Is Changing My Life

https://reorx.com/blog/openclaw-is-changing-my-life/
1•novoreorx•4m ago•0 comments

Everything you need to know about lasers in one photo

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Commercial_laser_lines.svg
1•mahirsaid•6m ago•0 comments

SCOTUS to decide if 1988 video tape privacy law applies to internet uses

https://www.jurist.org/news/2026/01/us-supreme-court-to-decide-if-1988-video-tape-privacy-law-app...
1•voxadam•7m ago•0 comments

Epstein files reveal deeper ties to scientists than previously known

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-00388-0
1•XzetaU8•15m ago•0 comments

Red teamers arrested conducting a penetration test

https://www.infosecinstitute.com/podcast/red-teamers-arrested-conducting-a-penetration-test/
1•begueradj•22m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Open-source AI powered Kubernetes IDE

https://github.com/agentkube/agentkube
1•saiyampathak•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Lucid – Use LLM hallucination to generate verified software specs

https://github.com/gtsbahamas/hallucination-reversing-system
1•tywells•28m ago•0 comments

AI Doesn't Write Every Framework Equally Well

https://x.com/SevenviewSteve/article/2019601506429730976
1•Osiris30•31m ago•0 comments

Aisbf – an intelligent routing proxy for OpenAI compatible clients

https://pypi.org/project/aisbf/
1•nextime•32m ago•1 comments

Let's handle 1M requests per second

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4EwfEU8CGA
1•4pkjai•32m ago•0 comments

OpenClaw Partners with VirusTotal for Skill Security

https://openclaw.ai/blog/virustotal-partnership
1•zhizhenchi•33m ago•0 comments

Goal: Ship 1M Lines of Code Daily

2•feastingonslop•43m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Codex-mem, 90% fewer tokens for Codex

https://github.com/StartripAI/codex-mem
1•alfredray•46m ago•0 comments

FastLangML: FastLangML:Context‑aware lang detector for short conversational text

https://github.com/pnrajan/fastlangml
1•sachuin23•49m ago•1 comments

LineageOS 23.2

https://lineageos.org/Changelog-31/
1•pentagrama•52m ago•0 comments

Crypto Deposit Frauds

2•wwdesouza•54m ago•0 comments

Substack makes money from hosting Nazi newsletters

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/feb/07/revealed-how-substack-makes-money-from-hosting-nazi...
3•lostlogin•54m ago•0 comments

Framing an LLM as a safety researcher changes its language, not its judgement

https://lab.fukami.eu/LLMAAJ
1•dogacel•56m ago•0 comments

Are there anyone interested about a creator economy startup

1•Nejana•57m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Skill Lab – CLI tool for testing and quality scoring agent skills

https://github.com/8ddieHu0314/Skill-Lab
1•qu4rk5314•58m ago•0 comments

2003: What is Google's Ultimate Goal? [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqdi1xjtys4
1•1659447091•58m ago•0 comments

Roger Ebert Reviews "The Shawshank Redemption"

https://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/great-movie-the-shawshank-redemption-1994
1•monero-xmr•1h ago•0 comments

Busy Months in KDE Linux

https://pointieststick.com/2026/02/06/busy-months-in-kde-linux/
1•todsacerdoti•1h ago•0 comments

Zram as Swap

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Zram#Usage_as_swap
1•seansh•1h ago•1 comments

Green’s Dictionary of Slang - Five hundred years of the vulgar tongue

https://greensdictofslang.com/
1•mxfh•1h ago•0 comments

Nvidia CEO Says AI Capital Spending Is Appropriate, Sustainable

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-06/nvidia-ceo-says-ai-capital-spending-is-appropr...
1•virgildotcodes•1h ago•3 comments

Show HN: StyloShare – privacy-first anonymous file sharing with zero sign-up

https://www.styloshare.com
1•stylofront•1h ago•0 comments

Part 1 the Persistent Vault Issue: Your Encryption Strategy Has a Shelf Life

1•PhantomKey•1h ago•0 comments

Show HN: Teleop_xr – Modular WebXR solution for bimanual robot teleoperation

https://github.com/qrafty-ai/teleop_xr
1•playercc7•1h ago•1 comments

The Highest Exam: How the Gaokao Shapes China

https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v48/n02/iza-ding/studying-is-harmful
2•mitchbob•1h ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Oh fuck! How do people feel about robots that leverage profanity?

https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05831
18•rolph•8mo ago

Comments

rolph•8mo ago
the actual title seems to be unacceptable, however the obvious profanity version is.

[pseudo]actual title :

"Oh F**k! How Do People Feel about Robots that Leverage Profanity?"

even this breaks, very interesting

pvg•8mo ago
HN fucks

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39392726

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44122636

kingforaday•8mo ago
So does Jared Dunn from Silicon Valley.
zfnmxt•8mo ago
Good; censoring profanity (especially self-censoring) is for cowards. Be brave and dish out your fucks liberally in your papers!
sim7c00•8mo ago
interesting paper / idea. i like the idea of a robot or ai who uses profanity like a regular person (if thats ur thing, guess it depends on ur context). i know people who instruct their ai assistants to be rude, mean or profane because they listen better to that. like asking it to tell you to RTFM if you ask a question thats trivially answered (compared to some further context you specify , or not).

i suppose everyone learns to listen better to certain personas through their lifes experiences, so its good to be able to tune it towards personal preferences and not but overly protective or conservative limits or restrictions. (obviously thats a snake pit so i do totally understand tight restrictions)

mrandish•8mo ago
The default obsequious, yuppie buddy chatbot personas of today make me hate them. Douglas Adams in Hitchhiker's Guide perfectly captured the infuriating annoyance of machines programmed to act like overly polite friends when he had the automatic doors always tell you how delighted they were to open for you.

It's a machine, dammit. One of its (potential) advantages vs hiring a human is not having extraneous transactional exchanges. If my personal AI assistant had to have a persona, I'd rather it sound and talk like Joe Pesci from Goodfellas.

jcims•8mo ago
I'm tinkering with the 'indifferent god' persona and it's been very refreshing.
stavros•8mo ago
If you think of LLMs as machines, you will be surprised a lot more than if you think of them as humans, so the latter is the better abstraction.
mrandish•8mo ago
> you will be surprised a lot more than if you think of them as humans, so the latter is the better abstraction.

I'm not following what you mean here. In what ways do you think I'd be surprised?

stavros•8mo ago
In that they can't do math, they don't follow instructions well, they aren't accurate, which are all things that are surprising for machines but very non-surprising for humans.
mrandish•8mo ago
Oh, I see. I'm already well aware of the many substantial limitations of LLMs and the counter-intuitive nature of these gaps. My comment was pre-assuming a scenario where the chat AI could usefully and correctly answer the question and, even in that case, I want the chat AI to just answer the question and not pretend to have a human-like personality.
stavros•8mo ago
Yes, but my point is that that's the wrong way to think about it. They don't have a human-like personality that was tacked on, they _are_ more human than machine.
avsteele•8mo ago
Profanity should not be in the title of scientific articles. Most unprofessional. In addition, titling your article for shock value should be discouraged. The end point will be a degraded discourse.
zfnmxt•8mo ago
Professionalism is not a virtue; measured irreverence is---an uncensored "Fuck" in this scenario falls into that category.

Silliness has an important and necessary place in research.

avsteele•8mo ago
NOT in professional communication. If you want to run your lab that way, feel free.
ghssds•8mo ago
We tell children to don't use profanity because they have a hard time regulating themselves. Telling adults to do the same is misplaced authoritarian behavior, the kind that may come from people who failed to mature and still obey (and repeat) what they were told as a child but now sound obsequious.
scottyah•8mo ago
Profanity largely exists to be offensive, and loses power when ubiquitous. It especially loses power when five year olds say it for every little mood swing they have. Nobody wants to hear offensive words from a child because it makes adults realize how childish they sound.
arp242•8mo ago
I've joined jobs and the first thing people said to me is "ah, you must be the new cunt!"

Different people have different standards for this type of thing. Be a good cunt and accept that there are over 8 billion people on the world, some of whom have very different norms than you have. Don't declare your own standards as somehow authoritative.

avsteele•8mo ago
We have certain professional communications standards in the scientific community. This isn't a corner bar.
arp242•8mo ago
No, you have certain ways you like communication to happen. That's okay, everyone had that. To present this as some sort of objective standard is complete bollocks, as is your claim that it somehow "degrades" discourse.

This applies twentyfold when the topic of the scientific paper is swearing. Like mate, seriously?

Anyway, I tried. Good luck with your life.

const_cast•8mo ago
I tend to agree. A lot of medical and scientific writing often falls on deaf ears because most people only respond to a conversational tone. That's why you write corporate emails in a conversational tone, it's just what's most effective.

I think, if the subject matters call for it, which clearly this does as they're literally looking at swearing, then it can be fine to swear. It can be more concise and more accurate.

stavros•8mo ago
I agree as well, I really dislike the overly formal tone we've tended to adopt in order to signal that the content is important. If you have important stuff to say, it'll be important even if you use simple words to say it.
koolba•8mo ago
> I've joined jobs and the first thing people said to me is "ah, you must be the new cunt!"

The reaction to that welcome is highly location dependent.

II2II•8mo ago
I suspect the use of profanity was to grab people's attention, rather than for shock value. I would consider it as unprofessional, much as I would consider an article titled "Stars that go boom" to be unprofessional. I would suggest that it should be discouraged, mostly because we don't want scientific journals to come off sounding like tabloids. Yet I don't think that it automatically results in degraded discourse.
os2warpman•8mo ago
There is no profanity in that title.

“F**k” could be any number of things. (Shrugging guy emoji)

As a methodically scientific academically academic scientist myself I struggle to arrive at a firm and defensible position on what it could be.

mousethatroared•8mo ago
Tails are what get you though.

I'd probably smash a robot that swore at me or my family.

"Tell your c---t daughter to get off the street"

Will probably result in me looking for a heavy stone.

Swear words are literally fighting words whilst a robot cannot, legally, be assaulted. I'll take destruction of property to defend my daughter's honor to a jury of normies.

Swizec•8mo ago
I'd prefer swearing over a robot who says "Per my last email, ..."

But let's be honest: The thing we're both afraid of is a robot who can get impatient and emotional.

mousethatroared•8mo ago
They've already programmed impatience to the chat bots in federal government offices. Get testy and they'll hang up on you. However, they can't get emotional, they lack soul.
daveguy•8mo ago
They can't get impatient either. Only some vague semblance of what impatience means to a programmer or two.
stavros•8mo ago
I think you missed the GP's joke there.
daveguy•8mo ago
Oh yeah, boo federal government bots because boo federal government. Hilarious.
delichon•8mo ago
You don't want me on that jury. But if you pick up a heavy civil suit instead of a stone, you do.
mousethatroared•8mo ago
Civil suit for what?

It needs to get to a jury and for that the prosecutor needs to think he'll win.

I doubt most prosecutors will stake their conviction ratio for a very sympathetic defendant.

(Except in San Fran and DC. There ill take whatever deal Im offered)

delichon•8mo ago
You don't need a prosecutor's cooperation to file a civil lawsuit in the US.

In the described scenario I'd be happy to find in your favor for intentional infliction of emotional distress, with negligence and vicarious liability and extra zeros.

teddyh•8mo ago
“But Orcs and Trolls spoke as they would, without love of words or things; and their language was actually more degraded and filthy than I have shown it. I do not suppose that any will wish for a closer rendering, though models are easy to find. Much the same sort of talk can still be heard among the orc-minded; dreary and repetitive with hatred and contempt, too long removed from good to retain even verbal vigour, save in the ears of those to whom only the squalid sounds strong.”

— J.R.R. Tolkien, The Lord of the Rings, Appendix F, Part II, On Translation

trebligdivad•8mo ago
Swearing is very location dependent, as a Brit, and a northern one at that, peppering a few swear words in may not be that unusual. This can, erm how shall we put it, 'surprise' some others.
Molitor5901•8mo ago
My first question would be: Why? As in: Why do we even need or want to program robots to use profanity?
beefnugs•8mo ago
Because the cutest little fluf ball who just squeeked she loves me then wobbles back and forth back to her charging station blurting out an oh fuck as she stubs her toe is hilarious and i deserve to have that in my life
vasusen•8mo ago
Grok's unhinged mode is the closest I have seen a bot that leverages profanity. I find it quite entertaining to use occasionally like watching a South Park episode.
CaffeineLD50•8mo ago
I fucking approve!
Yizahi•8mo ago
Robots today can't "leverage profanity". Robots today can generate words either excluding profanity via some pre-made dictionary or not excluding them. Since both results are simply rehash of the human created data, of course it is possible to program robots to copy profanity too.

It really says nothing about the robot, because it is a robot; but a characteristic of a human who programmed it.