frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Toroidal Logit Bias – Reduce LLM hallucinations 40% with no fine-tuning

https://github.com/Paraxiom/topological-coherence
1•slye514•31s ago•1 comments

Top AI models fail at >96% of tasks

https://www.zdnet.com/article/ai-failed-test-on-remote-freelance-jobs/
1•codexon•42s ago•1 comments

The Science of the Perfect Second (2023)

https://harpers.org/archive/2023/04/the-science-of-the-perfect-second/
1•NaOH•1m ago•0 comments

Bob Beck (OpenBSD) on why vi should stay vi (2006)

https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=115820462402673&w=2
2•birdculture•5m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Glimpsh – exploring gaze input inside the terminal

https://github.com/dchrty/glimpsh
1•dochrty•6m ago•0 comments

The Optima-l Situation: A deep dive into the classic humanist sans-serif

https://micahblachman.beehiiv.com/p/the-optima-l-situation
1•subdomain•6m ago•0 comments

Barn Owls Know When to Wait

https://blog.typeobject.com/posts/2026-barn-owls-know-when-to-wait/
1•fintler•6m ago•0 comments

Implementing TCP Echo Server in Rust [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjOBZ_Xzuio
1•sheerluck•7m ago•0 comments

LicGen – Offline License Generator (CLI and Web UI)

1•tejavvo•10m ago•0 comments

Service Degradation in West US Region

https://azure.status.microsoft/en-gb/status?gsid=5616bb85-f380-4a04-85ed-95674eec3d87&utm_source=...
2•_____k•10m ago•0 comments

The Janitor on Mars

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1998/10/26/the-janitor-on-mars
1•evo_9•12m ago•0 comments

Bringing Polars to .NET

https://github.com/ErrorLSC/Polars.NET
3•CurtHagenlocher•14m ago•0 comments

Adventures in Guix Packaging

https://nemin.hu/guix-packaging.html
1•todsacerdoti•15m ago•0 comments

Show HN: We had 20 Claude terminals open, so we built Orcha

1•buildingwdavid•15m ago•0 comments

Your Best Thinking Is Wasted on the Wrong Decisions

https://www.iankduncan.com/engineering/2026-02-07-your-best-thinking-is-wasted-on-the-wrong-decis...
1•iand675•15m ago•0 comments

Warcraftcn/UI – UI component library inspired by classic Warcraft III aesthetics

https://www.warcraftcn.com/
1•vyrotek•16m ago•0 comments

Trump Vodka Becomes Available for Pre-Orders

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kirkogunrinde/2025/12/01/trump-vodka-becomes-available-for-pre-order...
1•stopbulying•17m ago•0 comments

Velocity of Money

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity_of_money
1•gurjeet•20m ago•0 comments

Stop building automations. Start running your business

https://www.fluxtopus.com/automate-your-business
1•valboa•24m ago•1 comments

You can't QA your way to the frontier

https://www.scorecard.io/blog/you-cant-qa-your-way-to-the-frontier
1•gk1•25m ago•0 comments

Show HN: PalettePoint – AI color palette generator from text or images

https://palettepoint.com
1•latentio•26m ago•0 comments

Robust and Interactable World Models in Computer Vision [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B4kkaGOozA
2•Anon84•30m ago•0 comments

Nestlé couldn't crack Japan's coffee market.Then they hired a child psychologist

https://twitter.com/BigBrainMkting/status/2019792335509541220
1•rmason•31m ago•1 comments

Notes for February 2-7

https://taoofmac.com/space/notes/2026/02/07/2000
2•rcarmo•33m ago•0 comments

Study confirms experience beats youthful enthusiasm

https://www.theregister.com/2026/02/07/boomers_vs_zoomers_workplace/
2•Willingham•40m ago•0 comments

The Big Hunger by Walter J Miller, Jr. (1952)

https://lauriepenny.substack.com/p/the-big-hunger
2•shervinafshar•41m ago•0 comments

The Genus Amanita

https://www.mushroomexpert.com/amanita.html
1•rolph•46m ago•0 comments

We have broken SHA-1 in practice

https://shattered.io/
10•mooreds•46m ago•4 comments

Ask HN: Was my first management job bad, or is this what management is like?

1•Buttons840•47m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How to Reduce Time Spent Crimping?

2•pinkmuffinere•49m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Show HN: MailShrimp – validate email lists with risk level and confidence score

https://www.mailshrimp.app
3•udiocla•8mo ago
Hi HN,

I recently launched MailShrimp, a tool to validate email addresses and prevent bounces — but with a twist: it returns both a risk category (valid, risky, invalid) and a confidence score (e.g., 0.93).

It performs:

Syntax & format checks

DNS / MX resolution

SMTP verification (with proxy fallback)

Disposable & catch-all detection

Score & classify each email

It’s designed to be:

Fast Clear (human-readable results + exportable data) Dev-ready (API coming soon)

You can paste emails or upload a CSV to test. Would love your thoughts or suggestions.

Live version: https://www.mailshrimp.app

PH launch: https://www.producthunt.com/products/mailshrimp

Comments

perryraskin•8mo ago
Neat. What are you using on the backend to verify? How is it different from other platforms such as Emailable?
udiocla•8mo ago
Thanks!

We're using a proprietary multi-layered algorithm that combines a series of criteria, checks, and heuristics to assess each email address.

It includes:

Format and domain-level validations SMTP-level interaction with fallback logic Detection of disposable domains, catch-all behavior, and risky patterns A scoring model that returns both a risk label (valid, risky, invalid) and a confidence score (0.0 to 1.0) And much more — especially for nuanced edge cases and deliverability signals

Unlike many validators that return a binary result, MailShrimp gives you both a label and a score, so you can decide what’s safe to keep based on your own thresholds.

We're also focused on speed and usability. Our logic is designed to handle edge cases often missed by more generic tools.

Still early stage — feedback is very welcome!

perryraskin•8mo ago
Sounds really useful. Still, I believe Emailable does that, including the scores. Have you tried it?
udiocla•8mo ago
Yes, we’ve tried Emailable — solid tool, but quite expensive in the long run.

MailShrimp is built to be much more lightweight, transparent, and affordable (starts at $14.90/month for 10,000 validations) — and you can try it for free.

Would love to hear your thoughts if you give it a spin.

perryraskin•8mo ago
Maybe they changed their pricing but my team paid $25 for 25,000 validations as a one time thing. We’re not in need of 10,000 a month so I wouldn’t be able to try it out soon. But yeah I guess I’m just still not sure how it’s that different from Emailable. Not that there’s any issue with competition of course!