I've been working on TSUKUYOMI, a modular framework that implements intelligence community analytical standards in AI systems. It's essentially a collection of 40+ specialized modules that can be orchestrated to perform structured analysis on complex data.
Each module follows a structured execution sequence with explicit reasoning chains. The orchestration core dynamically selects and chains modules based on requirements.
Current AI systems are great at pattern matching but poor at structured reasoning. In intelligence analysis, you need:
- Explicit evidence chains
- Alternative hypothesis consideration
- Quantified uncertainty
- Source attribution
- Audit trails
TSUKUYOMI provides these through modular components that enforce analytical rigor.
Current implementation
- Runs in Claude AI environment (upload the .tsukuyomi files)
- Modules are JSON-based configurations defining analytical workflows
- Includes specialized processors for HUMINT, SIGINT, GEOINT, OSINT, CYBINT
- Outputs professional intelligence products with proper confidence levels
Interesting technical bits
1. Multi-source information fusion (MSIF) at three levels: data, feature, and decision
2. Bayesian confidence integration across heterogeneous sources
3. Dynamic module orchestration based on information requirements
4. Classification-aware processing (handles UNCLASSIFIED through TOP SECRET)
Use cases beyond intelligence
- Research: Systematic literature review with source credibility scoring
- Business: Competitive analysis with structured methodology
- Engineering: Failure analysis using ACH framework
- Security: Threat correlation across multiple data sources
Future development
- Standalone Python implementation
- REST API for integration
- Custom module development SDK
- Visualization components for link analysis
Looking for feedback on:
1. The module architecture approach
2. Other domains where structured analysis would be valuable
3. Integration ideas with existing analytical workflows
The code is MIT licensed. Contributions welcome, especially domain-specific modules.
ShimazuSystems•1d ago
I've been working on TSUKUYOMI, a modular framework that implements intelligence community analytical standards in AI systems. It's essentially a collection of 40+ specialized modules that can be orchestrated to perform structured analysis on complex data.
GitHub: https://github.com/ShimazuSystems/TSUKUYOMI/
What it does
Instead of relying on black-box AI responses, TSUKUYOMI enforces structured analytical methodologies:
- Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) - Systematically evaluates multiple explanations - Source reliability scoring - A-F reliability, 1-6 credibility (IC standards) - Multi-source correlation - Temporal, spatial, semantic, network analysis - Confidence quantification - Bayesian fusion with uncertainty propagation
Technical approach
Each module follows a structured execution sequence with explicit reasoning chains. The orchestration core dynamically selects and chains modules based on requirements.Example: OSINT Analysis
Why I built thisCurrent AI systems are great at pattern matching but poor at structured reasoning. In intelligence analysis, you need: - Explicit evidence chains - Alternative hypothesis consideration - Quantified uncertainty - Source attribution - Audit trails
TSUKUYOMI provides these through modular components that enforce analytical rigor.
Current implementation
- Runs in Claude AI environment (upload the .tsukuyomi files) - Modules are JSON-based configurations defining analytical workflows - Includes specialized processors for HUMINT, SIGINT, GEOINT, OSINT, CYBINT - Outputs professional intelligence products with proper confidence levels
Interesting technical bits
1. Multi-source information fusion (MSIF) at three levels: data, feature, and decision 2. Bayesian confidence integration across heterogeneous sources 3. Dynamic module orchestration based on information requirements 4. Classification-aware processing (handles UNCLASSIFIED through TOP SECRET)
Use cases beyond intelligence
- Research: Systematic literature review with source credibility scoring - Business: Competitive analysis with structured methodology - Engineering: Failure analysis using ACH framework - Security: Threat correlation across multiple data sources
Future development
- Standalone Python implementation - REST API for integration - Custom module development SDK - Visualization components for link analysis
Looking for feedback on: 1. The module architecture approach 2. Other domains where structured analysis would be valuable 3. Integration ideas with existing analytical workflows
The code is MIT licensed. Contributions welcome, especially domain-specific modules.