It doesn't look like high-value information such as blueprints, other technical or engineering info, or code.
I wonder if such targets are considered civillian or military under the laws of war. The factory is almost certainly a military target.
Also, while blueprints or code won't help shut down the enterprise (which isn't functioning anyway), they could help with countermeasures.
As I tell my children, “make good choices.”
https://cepa.org/article/assassination-the-trouble-with-the-...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/12/17/world/europe/igor-kirillo... | https://archive.today/m0cn9
Lots of American make things for all sorts of brutal regimes. Are they acceptable targets?
We can argue about it - I actually agree that people making bombers seem like acceptable targets to me - but that's mostly irrelevant. The question will be the effect on support and morale when the news shows someone's home burning and even other civilians dead, and whether the benefit is worth those costs.
> building bombers
I don't think they are building any bombers at this point; they lack the components. Maybe repairing and supporting them?
дряблый, импотентный и обозлённый Путин
https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/rumors-about-oreshnik-missil...
duxup•8mo ago
They don't really explain the significance. They mention names of people are known and you could make theories as to how that MIGHT be useful ... but it's not clear if it actually is actionable type information.
anovikov•8mo ago
BLKNSLVR•8mo ago
Having said that, I think the significance can still be overestimated.