frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

We interfaced single-threaded C++ with multi-threaded Rust

https://antithesis.com/blog/2026/rust_cpp/
1•lukastyrychtr•1m ago•0 comments

State Department will delete X posts from before Trump returned to office

https://text.npr.org/nx-s1-5704785
1•derriz•1m ago•0 comments

AI Skills Marketplace

https://skly.ai
1•briannezhad•1m ago•1 comments

Show HN: A fast TUI for managing Azure Key Vault secrets written in Rust

https://github.com/jkoessle/akv-tui-rs
1•jkoessle•1m ago•0 comments

eInk UI Components in CSS

https://eink-components.dev/
1•edent•2m ago•0 comments

Discuss – Do AI agents deserve all the hype they are getting?

1•MicroWagie•5m ago•0 comments

ChatGPT is changing how we ask stupid questions

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/02/06/stupid-questions-ai/
1•edward•6m ago•0 comments

Zig Package Manager Enhancements

https://ziglang.org/devlog/2026/#2026-02-06
2•jackhalford•7m ago•1 comments

Neutron Scans Reveal Hidden Water in Martian Meteorite

https://www.universetoday.com/articles/neutron-scans-reveal-hidden-water-in-famous-martian-meteorite
1•geox•8m ago•0 comments

Deepfaking Orson Welles's Mangled Masterpiece

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/02/09/deepfaking-orson-welless-mangled-masterpiece
1•fortran77•10m ago•1 comments

France's homegrown open source online office suite

https://github.com/suitenumerique
3•nar001•12m ago•1 comments

SpaceX Delays Mars Plans to Focus on Moon

https://www.wsj.com/science/space-astronomy/spacex-delays-mars-plans-to-focus-on-moon-66d5c542
1•BostonFern•12m ago•0 comments

Jeremy Wade's Mighty Rivers

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyOro6vMGsP_xkW6FXxsaeHUkD5e-9AUa
1•saikatsg•13m ago•0 comments

Show HN: MCP App to play backgammon with your LLM

https://github.com/sam-mfb/backgammon-mcp
2•sam256•15m ago•0 comments

AI Command and Staff–Operational Evidence and Insights from Wargaming

https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/ai-command-and-staff-operational-evidence-and-in...
1•tomwphillips•15m ago•0 comments

Show HN: CCBot – Control Claude Code from Telegram via tmux

https://github.com/six-ddc/ccbot
1•sixddc•16m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Is the CoCo 3 the best 8 bit computer ever made?

2•amichail•18m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Convert your articles into videos in one click

https://vidinie.com/
2•kositheastro•21m ago•0 comments

Red Queen's Race

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Queen%27s_race
2•rzk•21m ago•0 comments

The Anthropic Hive Mind

https://steve-yegge.medium.com/the-anthropic-hive-mind-d01f768f3d7b
2•gozzoo•24m ago•0 comments

A Horrible Conclusion

https://addisoncrump.info/research/a-horrible-conclusion/
1•todsacerdoti•24m ago•0 comments

I spent $10k to automate my research at OpenAI with Codex

https://twitter.com/KarelDoostrlnck/status/2019477361557926281
2•tosh•25m ago•1 comments

From Zero to Hero: A Spring Boot Deep Dive

https://jcob-sikorski.github.io/me/
1•jjcob_sikorski•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Solving NP-Complete Structures via Information Noise Subtraction (P=NP)

https://zenodo.org/records/18395618
1•alemonti06•31m ago•1 comments

Cook New Emojis

https://emoji.supply/kitchen/
1•vasanthv•33m ago•0 comments

Show HN: LoKey Typer – A calm typing practice app with ambient soundscapes

https://mcp-tool-shop-org.github.io/LoKey-Typer/
1•mikeyfrilot•36m ago•0 comments

Long-Sought Proof Tames Some of Math's Unruliest Equations

https://www.quantamagazine.org/long-sought-proof-tames-some-of-maths-unruliest-equations-20260206/
1•asplake•37m ago•0 comments

Hacking the last Z80 computer – FOSDEM 2026 [video]

https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/FEHLHY-hacking_the_last_z80_computer_ever_made/
2•michalpleban•37m ago•0 comments

Browser-use for Node.js v0.2.0: TS AI browser automation parity with PY v0.5.11

https://github.com/webllm/browser-use
1•unadlib•38m ago•0 comments

Michael Pollan Says Humanity Is About to Undergo a Revolutionary Change

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/07/magazine/michael-pollan-interview.html
2•mitchbob•39m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Editing astrophotography

https://astroimagery.com/techniques/post-processing/how-to-edit-astrophotography-with-ease/
24•karlperera•8mo ago

Comments

karlperera•8mo ago
Instead of using the more expensive software such as Pixinsight which costs at least 300 Euros, I try to use free software where possible. I do use Photoshop a little which is not free but not expensive either.

I have used many techniques in Siril and Seti Astro Suite to create many awesome astro images. These two programs are constantly improving! Which software do you use for astrophotgraphy?

supriyo-biswas•8mo ago
Is this account posting solely LLM-generated content? Please don't do that here.
andsoitis•8mo ago
Recently bought the Celestron Origin, which dramatically reduces barrier to entry because it automates a lot of the manual work like image stacking. Output is not as stellar as a more bespoke workflow, but payoff is more immediate. https://www.celestron.com/products/celestron-origin-intellig...
nacs•8mo ago
> dramatically reduces barrier to entry

.. But it adds one big barrier which is the $4000 price..

You can do astrophotography with a DSLR for a tiny fraction of that cost.

elteto•8mo ago
For a fraction yes, for a _tiny_ fraction... most likely no.
malfist•8mo ago
This article is kinda not that great. It's shallow, skips all the information about stacking, calibration frames and all the base layer needed to get to the editing step.

It also has steps out of order (gradient removal is done first), and doesn't even talk about linear/non-linear edits.

Highly recommend picking up pixinsight and a book on how to use it.

Bona fides: I'm an astrophotographer, you can see my work in the link in my profile (not posting it here because I'm not trying to promote it).

dylan604•8mo ago
The internet has been around long enough that pretty much everything has been posted. The older content is probably better content as it was done as an actual write up by knowledgeable people vs new content written by someone looking to be a thought leader to boost their influencer profiles. Nevermind the AI generated content.

I have no idea the background of TFA's author, but it is a noticeable trend that makes my use of the internet decrease.

malfist•8mo ago
Looking more through this blog, it's clear that even if there's a human directing it, it's just blogspam. Every post is filled with surface level drivel and tons of affiliate links.

Look at their most recent post about the horsehead nebula: https://astroimagery.com/astrophotography/deep-space-astroph...

It's just straight up bad advice with affiliate link after affiliate link after affiliate link.

karlperera•8mo ago
I am a real person and some of those comments sting! believe it or not I will try to improve and am doing my best documenting my journey and all that have learnt in astrophotography.
mcdeltat•8mo ago
Surprisingly little real information in this article. It could be summed up as "use noise reduction, tone curves, and local contrast" without need for further waffle. Smells a bit like blog spam.

What I would've found helpful would be a discussion of proper exposure for astrophotography, which oddly enough was missing. If your exposure is screwed then your edits will be screwed too. They mention pulling back the star highlights and boosting darker areas, well it would be interesting to hear the author's opinions on the optimal exposure settings to enable those edits without excessive noise or clipping.

Also my pet peeve, getting colour science technicalities wrong. "RAW files are dull" no RAW files are simply not viewable as-is and any attempt to display them without proper tone mapping is pointless. "Linear image" - what does this even mean? No respect for the colour pipeline :(

karlperera•8mo ago
You are completely right mcdeltat. The problem with writing content is that without feedback it is easy to forget or miss something, even if it appears to be very obvious to you sometimes it is just too easy to miss. A webpage needs to be constantly updated.

I am very happy with your comments and will use them to update and improve the page. On the website as a whole I have all the things you talk about including an exposure calculator: https://astroimagery.com/techniques/imaging/astrophotography...

Of course, it is not perfect. Nothing can be but it is a good starting point and I tried to base it on real experience and some research.

The wrong words yes for RAW files: they appear black and lifeless but contain a rich amount of detail which requires stretching and the rest.