frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

NewASM Virtual Machine

https://github.com/bracesoftware/newasm
1•DEntisT_•2m ago•0 comments

Terminal-Bench 2.0 Leaderboard

https://www.tbench.ai/leaderboard/terminal-bench/2.0
1•tosh•2m ago•0 comments

I vibe coded a BBS bank with a real working ledger

https://mini-ledger.exe.xyz/
1•simonvc•2m ago•1 comments

The Path to Mojo 1.0

https://www.modular.com/blog/the-path-to-mojo-1-0
1•tosh•5m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I'm 75, building an OSS Virtual Protest Protocol for digital activism

https://github.com/voice-of-japan/Virtual-Protest-Protocol/blob/main/README.md
4•sakanakana00•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I built Divvy to split restaurant bills from a photo

https://divvyai.app/
3•pieterdy•11m ago•0 comments

Hot Reloading in Rust? Subsecond and Dioxus to the Rescue

https://codethoughts.io/posts/2026-02-07-rust-hot-reloading/
3•Tehnix•11m ago•1 comments

Skim – vibe review your PRs

https://github.com/Haizzz/skim
2•haizzz•13m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Open-source AI assistant for interview reasoning

https://github.com/evinjohnn/natively-cluely-ai-assistant
3•Nive11•13m ago•4 comments

Tech Edge: A Living Playbook for America's Technology Long Game

https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/2026-01/260120_EST_Tech_Edge_0.pdf?Version...
2•hunglee2•17m ago•0 comments

Golden Cross vs. Death Cross: Crypto Trading Guide

https://chartscout.io/golden-cross-vs-death-cross-crypto-trading-guide
2•chartscout•19m ago•0 comments

Hoot: Scheme on WebAssembly

https://www.spritely.institute/hoot/
3•AlexeyBrin•22m ago•0 comments

What the longevity experts don't tell you

https://machielreyneke.com/blog/longevity-lessons/
2•machielrey•23m ago•1 comments

Monzo wrongly denied refunds to fraud and scam victims

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2026/feb/07/monzo-natwest-hsbc-refunds-fraud-scam-fos-ombudsman
3•tablets•28m ago•1 comments

They were drawn to Korea with dreams of K-pop stardom – but then let down

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cvgnq9rwyqno
2•breve•30m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI-Powered Merchant Intelligence

https://nodee.co
1•jjkirsch•33m ago•0 comments

Bash parallel tasks and error handling

https://github.com/themattrix/bash-concurrent
2•pastage•33m ago•0 comments

Let's compile Quake like it's 1997

https://fabiensanglard.net/compile_like_1997/index.html
2•billiob•34m ago•0 comments

Reverse Engineering Medium.com's Editor: How Copy, Paste, and Images Work

https://app.writtte.com/read/gP0H6W5
2•birdculture•39m ago•0 comments

Go 1.22, SQLite, and Next.js: The "Boring" Back End

https://mohammedeabdelaziz.github.io/articles/go-next-pt-2
1•mohammede•45m ago•0 comments

Laibach the Whistleblowers [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Mx2mxpaCY
1•KnuthIsGod•46m ago•1 comments

Slop News - The Front Page right now but it's only Slop

https://slop-news.pages.dev/slop-news
1•keepamovin•51m ago•1 comments

Economists vs. Technologists on AI

https://ideasindevelopment.substack.com/p/economists-vs-technologists-on-ai
1•econlmics•53m ago•0 comments

Life at the Edge

https://asadk.com/p/edge
4•tosh•59m ago•0 comments

RISC-V Vector Primer

https://github.com/simplex-micro/riscv-vector-primer/blob/main/index.md
4•oxxoxoxooo•1h ago•1 comments

Show HN: Invoxo – Invoicing with automatic EU VAT for cross-border services

2•InvoxoEU•1h ago•0 comments

A Tale of Two Standards, POSIX and Win32 (2005)

https://www.samba.org/samba/news/articles/low_point/tale_two_stds_os2.html
4•goranmoomin•1h ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Is the Downfall of SaaS Started?

4•throwaw12•1h ago•0 comments

Flirt: The Native Backend

https://blog.buenzli.dev/flirt-native-backend/
3•senekor•1h ago•0 comments

OpenAI's Latest Platform Targets Enterprise Customers

https://aibusiness.com/agentic-ai/openai-s-latest-platform-targets-enterprise-customers
2•myk-e•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Peeling the Covers Off Germany's Exascale "Jupiter" Supercomputer

https://www.nextplatform.com/2025/06/11/peeling-the-covers-off-germanys-exascale-jupiter-supercomputer/
46•rbanffy•8mo ago

Comments

theandrewbailey•8mo ago
Will Jupiter run... Jupyter?

I'll show myself out.

anher•7mo ago
It does already! (Signed up for this.)
SOLAR_FIELDS•7mo ago
Welcome :)
0x000xca0xfe•7mo ago
Interesting to see that the CPU tile on the GH200 is not smaller than the GPU.
supermatt•7mo ago
> speaks volumes about difficult it is to start from scratch to achieve chip independence for Europe

It’s tiring hearing this as if the US is any better on chip independence. Until VERY recently, both the US and Europe were limited to around 12nm domestically. Europe still has that capability, along with strong chip design companies, especially in automotive and industrial sectors. And nearly all modern US CPUs in mobile and embedded markets license Arm designs — a European (British) architecture.

filoleg•7mo ago
Why did you omit the rest of the sentence, which (imo) provides relevant context for your quote?

Here is the relevant context I was referring to:

> […] the fact that it is not using a custom CPU and XPU created by European companies, as was originally hoped, and is basically an Nvidia machine top to middle […] speaks volumes about difficult it is to start from scratch to achieve chip independence for Europe

The article isn’t arguing semantics, and your point regarding ARM and 12nm is valid. However, the bottom line of that specific sentence you partially quoted is that they were hoping to use a custom CPU+XPU created by European companies, but ended up going with NVidia (an American company) instead.

supermatt•7mo ago
Because none of the rest was relevant.

Here, i will isolate the specific piece:

> start from scratch

Europe isn’t “starting from scratch.” It already has 12nm-class fabs (just like the US did until very recently), designs its own chips, and developed the very architecture — ARM — that many other countries now use as the foundation for their processors.

filoleg•7mo ago
> Europe isn’t “starting from scratch.”It already has 12nm-class fabs (just like the US did until very recently), designs its own chips, and developed the very architecture — ARM.

Sure, but the way you put it makes the final outcome look even worse for Europe.

As you said, Europe already has 12nm-class fabs, designs its own chips, and yet they still went with NVidia.

If it was a choice between truly starting from scratch vs. going with NVidia, the decision to go with NVidia would’ve been more understandable. But given the context that they aren’t truly starting from scratch, their decision to go with NVidia just seems even more embarrassing.

supermatt•7mo ago
Clearly your intent is to be argumentative - but i'll bite:

They didn’t “go with nvidia”. Your ignorance is exactly why such a statement by the author is detrimental to the work done. The uninformed end up spreading misinformation.

The raw compute (the "booster") is only one part of the system. The rest - the cluster modules - are European-designed, including not just the SiPearl Rhea CPU (SiPearl, France), but also the system architecture and software stack (Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Germany), the interconnect (ParTec, Germany), and the cooling systems (Atos/Eviden, France). These cluster modules are integrated into the BullSequana XH3000 platform (Atos/Eviden, France). Fabrication is outsourced to TSMC (Taiwan), but the design remains fully European.

The fact is that the mission statement is to remain globally competitive in terms of computing power, and that means getting exascale as soon as possible. They aren’t going to wait for homegrown compute chips even if they were months away (which i doubt they will be).

By your logic all American supercomputers “went with Inria (France)”, because America is “starting from scratch” at writing software.. that they have software developers and chose to use European software is embarrassing.. see how stupid and ignorant such a statement is?

supermatt•7mo ago
Looking back again on the article, I can see why you are confused.

The author has outright fabricated this whole idea of chip sovereignty being a part of Jupiter. I have no idea where he (and therefore you) got this idea from, but its simply not true - and further points to him just making some excuse to euro-bash. It seems to be a sign of the times under the mad king’s reign. When facts don’t support the narrative, they get reshaped to suit the mood. This kind of editorialising, where political sentiment is passed off as technical insight, doesn’t just weaken the argument, it undermines trust in serious discourse.

FYI, the selection criteria only allocated 100 points of a total of 1100 (of which a minimum of 50 were required) to "Contribution to the objectives of the EuroHPC Joint Undertaking" (https://eurohpc-ju.europa.eu/about/discover-eurohpc-ju_en#mi...). i.e. Sovereignty was not a key objective. This is all public knowledge that you can easily find for yourself.

EDIT - link to the procurement doc: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/port...