WebKit Standards Positions

44•mooreds•8mo ago

Comments

jazzypants•7mo ago

This is nice to have, but I really wish that they would link to the actual position statement. It would be nice to see why they oppose things that seem to make a lot of since like the JSON application manifest.

aabhay•7mo ago

It makes no sense design-wise, but clicking on the number links to the GitHub discussion.

jazzypants•7mo ago

Awesome, thank you!

afavour•7mo ago

This is an interesting set to browse through. I feel genuinely conflicted about the decisions the Webkit team makes: I appreciate that they have a far stricter standard around privacy and security that others do, but also feel like they go too far at times and potentially use those as excuses to keep the web an inferior platform.

As an example, they oppose the ability to attach screenshots to a Progressive Web App manifest for use in an install prompt:

https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/49

The stated reason is because the screenshot could be malicious and made to look like native UI. Which... yes, I can't disagree that it could. But that's true of every image on the web. So is it genuine concern or is it a resistance to improving the state of App Store alternatives?

(not that it matters a ton, Safari doesn't even support those install prompts anyway!)

mdhb•7mo ago

I find it incredibly difficult to take Apples positions at face value that their primary reasons for not wanting to implement things comes down to privacy and not about trying to actively fuck up the web platform as a credible alternative to their walled garden which bullshit where they can tax people 30% for the privilege of running a static code analyzer over your codebase before you can release your app.

I think they are cynically screaming about privacy while egregious privacy violations are occurring on the native platform side through in-app browsers and spyware masquerading as SDKs that provide the financial backbone for much of their app ecosystem.

Just from a purely dispassionate and logical point of view, it’s incredibly difficult to come to the conclusion that Apple is doing anything other than protecting profits by trying to lock people in at every available opportunity.

bsmth•7mo ago

Nice to see this posted, this is something I occasionally have to look up. If you find it interesting, Mozilla has an equivalent here:

https://mozilla.github.io/standards-positions/

Show HN: Seedance 2.0 AI video generator for creators and ecommerce

Wally: A fun, reliable voice assistant in the shape of a penguin

Rewriting Pycparser with the Help of an LLM

Lobsters Vibecoding Challenge

E-Commerce vs. Social Commerce

Avoiding Modern C++ – Anton Mikhailov [video]

Show HN: AegisMind–AI system with 12 brain regions modeled on human neuroscience

Zig – Package Management Workflow Enhancements

AI-powered text correction for macOS

AppSecMaster – Learn Application Security with hands on challenges

Fibonacci Number Certificates

AI Overviews are killing the web search, and there's nothing we can do about it

City skylines need an upgrade in the face of climate stress

1979: The Model World of Robert Symes [video]

Satellites Have a Lot of Room

1980s Farm Crisis

Show HN: FSID - Identifier for files and directories (like ISBN for Books)

Show HN: Holy Grail: Open-Source Autonomous Development Agent

Show HN: Minecraft Creeper meets 90s Tamagotchi

Show HN: Termiteam – Control center for multiple AI agent terminals

The only U.S. particle collider shuts down

Ask HN: Why do purchased B2B email lists still have such poor deliverability?

Show HN: Remotion directory (videos and prompts)

Portable C Compiler

Show HN: Kokki – A "Dual-Core" System Prompt to Reduce LLM Hallucinations

Software Engineering Transformation 2026

Microsoft purges Win11 printer drivers, devices on borrowed time

Lunch with the FT: Tarek Mansour

Old Mexico and her lost provinces (1883)

'AI' is a dick move, redux