To motivate the development of micro-tools, Feynman offered a $1000 prize (more than $10,000 in current dollars), to anyone who could build a motor smaller than 1/64" on a side. Less than a year later, a Caltech grad won the prize, creating the motor with "a watchmaker's lathe, a microscope, and sharp toothpicks." Although the motor won the prize, it was a disappointment because it didn't use any new technologies or make any advances toward nanotechnology.
It wasn't until 1985 that Feynman's second challenge was won: scaling down a page of text by a linear factor of 25,000. A Stanford grad student reduced a page from A Tale of Two Cities to a 5.9µm square.
Links: https://calteches.library.caltech.edu/3479/1/Tale.pdf https://books.google.com/books?id=iXcmTROdA1EC&pg=RA2-PA10 https://archive.org/details/noordinarygenius00feyn/page/174/... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There%27s_Plenty_of_Room_at_th...
Despite his disappointment he did keep his word and pay the prize. His wife was not happy.
Btw does anyone know if there are any larger, mass-producible micromotors on the market that can be used to make products similar to the smartknob?
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005005915555405.html
It is of course gigantic compared to the motor from the article.
I have no real use for it other than the aesthetic appeal of a tiny mechanism, but perhaps one day I'll need something precisely moved by less than a centimetre occasionally.
This part looks fun: "Equipped with an explosion-proof casing". Like, it'll survive fireworks for ants?
blutack•5mo ago
https://www.chronova-engineering.co.uk/epoch
bee_rider•5mo ago
gabrielhidasy•5mo ago