AMD doesn't care about you being able to do computing on their consumer GPUs. The datacenter GPUs have a pretty good software stack and great support.

I still find their delay with properly investing in ROCm on client to be rather shocking, but in fairness they did finally announce that they would be supporting client cards on day 1[1]. Of course, AMD has to keep the promise for it to matter, but they really do seem to, for whatever reason, finally realized just how important it is that ROCm is well-supported across their entire stack (among many other investments they've announced recently.)

It's baffling that AMD is the same company that makes both Ryzen and Radeon, but the year-to-date for Radeon has been very good, aside from the official ROCm support for RDNA4 taking far too long. I wouldn't get overly optimistic; even if AMD finally committed hard to ROCm and Radeon it doesn't mean they'll be able to compete effectively against NVIDIA, but the consumer showing wasn't so bad so far with the 9070 XT and FSR4, so I'm cautiously optimistic they've decided to try to miss some opportunities to miss opportunities. Let's see how long these promises last... Maybe longer than a Threadripper socket, if we're lucky :)

[1]: https://www.phoronix.com/news/AMD-ROCm-H2-2025

Exactly.

AMD is a marketing company now

> I hope that guy gets an mi355 just for writing this. AMD deserves exactly zero of the credulity this writer heaps onto them.

You mean Ryan Smith of late AnandTech fame?

https://www.anandtech.com/author/85/

You mean a slower chip?

Their MI300s already beat them, 400s coming soon.

Last year I had issues using MI300X for training, and when it did work, was about 20-30% slower than H100, but I'm doing some OpenRLHF (transformers/DeepSpeed-based) DPO training atm w/ latest ROCm and PyTorch and it seems to be doing OK, roughly matching GPU-hour perf w/ an H200 for small ~12h runs.

Note: previous testing I did was on a single (8x) MI300X node, currently I'm doing testing on just a single MI300X GPU, so not quite apples-to-apples, multi-GPU/multi-node training is still a question mark, just a single data point.

It gets even more jarring that H100 is about three years old now.

Indeed. The stories I hear about software support for their entry-level hardware aren't great. Having a good on-ramp is essential.

OTOH, by emphasizing datacenter hardware, they can cover a relatively small portfolio and maximize access to it via cloud providers.

As much as I'd love to see an entry-level MI350-A workstation, that's not something that will likely happen.

There's a much older and more widely known Helios: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helios