frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

Warner Bros: fright night for bondholders

https://bondvigilantes.com/blog/2025/06/warner-bros-fright-night-for-bondholders/
1•Ozarkian•44s ago•0 comments

Google Chrome Music Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F50bCrlTbIs
1•ankitrgadiya•2m ago•0 comments

Founders: How do you audit code quality, infra costs, and dev team efficiency?

1•satya9099•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Life Anti-Checklist

https://antichecklist.com
1•alvinunreal•3m ago•0 comments

An Experimental New Dating Site Matches Singles Based on Their Browser Histories

https://www.wired.com/story/an-experimental-new-dating-site-matches-singles-based-on-their-browser-histories/
1•isaacfrond•3m ago•0 comments

Why Vaire is building reversible computers

https://www.worksinprogress.news/p/computers-of-the-future
1•bensouthwood•3m ago•0 comments

Scientists detect light passing through entire human head for brain imaging

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-06-scientists-entire-human-doors-brain.html
1•isaacfrond•4m ago•0 comments

Founders: How do you audit code quality, infra costs, and dev team efficiency?

1•satya9099•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I Built a Landing page analyzer

https://www.layzr.ai
1•Onur_b•7m ago•0 comments

Riichi Mahjong Strategy Books

https://dainachiba.github.io/RiichiBooks/
1•iNic•8m ago•0 comments

AI Reliability Engineering: Welcome to the Third Age of SRE

https://thenewstack.io/ai-reliability-engineering-welcome-to-the-third-age-of-sre/
1•kiyanwang•10m ago•0 comments

ChatGPT Tells Users to Alert the Media That It Is Trying to 'Break' People

https://gizmodo.com/chatgpt-tells-users-to-alert-the-media-that-it-is-trying-to-break-people-report-2000615600
2•isaacfrond•11m ago•0 comments

Building Efficient and Secure Container Environments

https://ataiva.com/containerization-best-practices/
1•fside•13m ago•0 comments

Matrix Is Cooked

https://blog.cyrneko.eu/matrix-is-cooked
1•cheshire_cat•13m ago•0 comments

What the Arc Browser Story Reveals About the Future of Browser Security

https://labs.sqrx.com/what-the-arc-browser-story-reveals-about-the-future-of-browser-security-55107b9eb621
1•botanicals6•19m ago•0 comments

People of Netua

https://blog.quineglobal.com/post/netua
1•ironmagma•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I made SEO backlink exchange platform using vector embeddings

https://www.babylovegrowth.ai/
1•overpower•20m ago•0 comments

First Steps with Logical Replication in PostgreSQL

https://boringsql.com/posts/logication-replication-introduction/
2•radimm•24m ago•0 comments

Building a Hardened Amazon Linux 2 AMI for Secure EC2 Deployments

https://thehiddenport.dev/posts/aws-ami-hardening/
1•ejher•24m ago•0 comments

Autonomous Vehicles in Norway – Winter Edition

https://blog.vfiles.no/posts/autonomous-vehicles-in-norway/
1•furkansahin•24m ago•0 comments

Isecjobs.com will be no more after August first

https://isecjobs.com/insights/isecjobscom-will-be-no-more-after-august-1st-time-to-check-out-foo/
1•dbof•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Hide Secrets Automatically in the Browser

https://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/hide-secrets/ldenkldeajffnnopcglkejofffefohio
1•vedantsinghal•29m ago•0 comments

Start your own Internet Resiliency Club

https://bowshock.nl/irc/
14•todsacerdoti•31m ago•0 comments

Viral Ribosome Profiling Could Speed Vaccine Development

https://www.genengnews.com/topics/infectious-diseases/viral-ribosome-profiling-could-speed-vaccine-development/
1•zeristor•37m ago•0 comments

About State and Trends of Carbon Pricing

https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/state-and-trends-of-carbon-pricing
1•doener•37m ago•0 comments

The CEO's Guide to Choosing the Right Tech Stack

https://sergiolema.dev/2025/06/16/the-ceos-guide-to-choosing-the-right-tech-stack/
1•sergiolema•42m ago•1 comments

07-HarmonyOS5-ObjectDetection-Case

1•zhousg•45m ago•0 comments

06-HarmonyOS5-SubjectSegmentation-Case

1•zhousg•47m ago•0 comments

Radicle Desktop: A Local‑First GUI for the Radicle Forge

https://radicle.xyz/2025/06/13/radicle-desktop
3•aiw1nt3rs•49m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Forezia – Free AI Forecasting for Small Shopify Stores

1•luistatera•49m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Show HN: Personalized Wealth Management – Institutional Meets Consumer

https://www.fulfilledwealth.co/home
11•workworkwork71•9h ago
Problem:

If you have less than $100k to invest, you get a robo-advisor that asks you 5 questions and dumps you into one of three cookie-cutter portfolios.

If you have more than $100k, you get a human advisor who charges 1-1.5% annually to... basically do the same thing with a smile and calming voice attached.

Meanwhile, institutional investors get custom strategies built around specific durations, target dates, tax situations and actual investment goals. Not because the math is harder—but because the economics only work at scale. Here's the thing: Both traditional advisors and robo-advisors maximize profit by minimizing choice and directing capital into the bias strategies that generate them additional margins. Both just tweak a risk slider and call it "personalization." But institutional-grade portfolio construction doesn't have to be exclusive to the wealthy. The road was paved by platforms like Plaid, brining API connectivity—platforms and asset aggregation into the mainstream. Modern AI completes the picture by making true personalization economically viable via "micro-advise".

No asset transfers, no new custodians, just sophisticated strategies based on your financial goals executed where you already invest coupled with personalized financial planning & budgeting.

Technical Solution:

We've built our MVP wealth management platform that creates truly personalized portfolios by combining institutional capital market expectations stemming 30+ global asset classes. All available through low-fee publicly available ETFs. Our approach:

- SEC licensed & compliant Registered Investment Advisor - Generates unlimited unique portfolio combinations optimized for risk, return & goal specifics.

- Personalizes to individual goals, not generic risk buckets.

- Learns and improves from every user interaction - Provides institutional-grade sophistication without human bottlenecks

- Removes manager bias for in-house strategies - Uses a "glidepath" approach similar to the US retirement target-date structure to maximize achievement certainty of important life goals (down-payment, retirement, etc)

- Seeks to bring elements of habit forming platforms (like Duolingo) into retail wealth. Business Model Innovation:

-Non-custodial + AI architecture enables subscription pricing ($10/month) instead of AUM fees. Users keep control of assets while getting personalized institutional strategies.

Research Validation:

- Glidepath strategies delivered higher values in 76% of scenarios (T. Rowe Price)

- Global diversification outperformed domestic-only in 96% of 3-year periods (Hübner) - Chance of success metrics for significant life goals like retirement & major milestones are measurably improved via behavioral advantages & sequence risk protection (T. Rowe Price).

Early Results:

-Alpha users report 90%+ cost reduction vs. traditional platforms with superior personalization. Institutional style portfolios achieving goal-specific optimization that would cost minimum 10x elsewhere.

-Base model portfolios have outperformed comparable portfolios from existing market incumbent robo-platforms on both an absolute & risk adjusted basis in H1 2025.

What's Different:

This isn't another robo-advisor using basic mean reversion. It's personalization that helps you understands and discover your specific goals and adapts continuously. Think "personal wealth manager in your pocket" rather than "generic portfolio assignment." All that, in a consumer product platform designed to empower retail investors and keep them engaged.

Next Steps:

Currently in invite-only alpha at www.fulfilledwealth.co. We focused early on the portfolio construction & delivery process and are now building out the consumer-facing aspects of the web application.

Looking for feedback from the HN community on our approaches to financial personalization.

Comments

vyasaveda•8h ago
The platform isn't clear, as I visited the platform. Only the FAQ provides adequate information about your platform, which isn't enough.

You must convey and deliver you you are, and why we should consider you in first place. You can write as:- A safe wealth management and optimization space, custom tailored on geographics, demographics, income, areas of expertise....., controlled and utilized by yourself, in guidance from experienced professionals and custom solution or something similar.

And if you're successful with conveying, let that to be tested by alpha or beta users, give the beta access to the HN community or targeted users so that they can feel the difference. You've mentioned the alpha results, but if I haven't seen or someone haven't seen and have access, we can't provide specific POV on core product and features.

itake•8h ago
> Still have questions?

The button below this doesn't seem to work.

> If you have more than $100k, you get a human advisor who charges 1-1.5% annually to... basically do the same thing with a smile and calming voice attached.

Maybe the crackpot scam ones. But I'm very happy with Vanguard's 0.15% or Schwab's 0.8% fee. I also personally am paying someone to tell me "no." I like the friction making changes to my portfolio and I like the trust I have with my advisor.

The website says a lot of surface level, "X, Y, and Z doesn't do these things well, but we do it better!" without actually explaining how you doing it better or what is better.

For example, robot advertises allow you to customize your portfolio based on your personal risk appetite. But your website claims they don't allow customizations. I'm guessing you can allow people to be even more specific (focus on income, international, etc) than they offer? But I have no idea why their customization level isn't good enough for me.

> Access the same high-quality investment strategies used by the world's top institutions, not just cookie-cutter limited funds.

I have no idea what "high-quality investment strategies" actually means. My Financial Advisor uses automatic rebalancing tools and tax loss harvesting tools.

Features like "saving for a car" aren't interesting to me.

workworkwork71•7h ago
Great feedback!

I'd just argue that even the 0.8% from Schwab is $4,000 on their minimum of $500,000. Where I worked (high networth wealth management at large bank) we had a minimum of 1 million and the starter fee was 1.35% or 13,500 annually. Definitely not a crack pot scam advisor and the portfolio management we did was very similar to what we've built out on this app.

We're doing more advanced portfolio construction at the client level then what you're going to get from Schwab and it's $100 a year vs $4000. If the relationship aspect of the advisory channel is important to you, then totally valid and fair point. This platform is aimed at the middle-market of people who aren't financially able to meet those minimums but want a better service then just automated portfolios.

> Customization

Great point! We would just not consider risk appetite an actual customization. After you've selected your risk, you're placed/bucketed into one of five portfolios that they offer and manage themselves.

What we do is factor in the risk appetite of the user plus the goal itself (whether you have a date you want the funds for or the importance of the goal) and then model it against evolving capital market expectations featuring 30+ domestic & global asset classes, constructing the optimal ETF portfolio to meet your return requirement at the lowest risk possible.

> Investment strategies

Another good point that we need to make more clear. We are modeling these portfolios using an institutional model with a wide range of asset classes and a "glidepath" (target date) structure like the US retirement portfolios. This prioritizes capital accumulation at earlier stages and then de-risks the portfolio gradually to make sure you have the capital you need as you reach your goal. It's a dynamic portfolio that evolves over time.

motoxpro•3h ago
Can you give an example? I feel like you didn’t answer any of their questions and I am genuinely curious about what these things mean. “Institutional model”? what does customization mean beyond time and risk?

It’s sounding like you you have a bucket of etfs that you call risky (Russel 2000, emerging market) and things that you call safe (bonds, debt, large cap) and depending on my time horizon and risk I start with a certain portfolio and you systematically roll into more “safe” based on my time horizon?

workworkwork71•3h ago
For sure! Let's take a pension fund as an example. When asset managers are looking at getting the returns to meet future obligations they are not simply looking at a simple formula of risk-adjusted returns. What they're actually doing is combining factors such as liquidity, time-horizon, hedging across multiple countries, geographies and (most importantly) asset classes. All of that is to say that they need to be sure that on date "X" they are able to meet forecasted obligation "Y".

That's the approach we've taken here. Pooling capital market expectations for 30+ global asset classes and taking into consideration the risk basis, time horizon, the financial goal (ie. is this a general wealth building portfolio or your retirement fund) and then yes, creating rules & heuristics around the type of asset classes that are appropriate for that unique situation. Then as the portfolio ages and your "path" matures (we use a glidepath structure to maintain a volatility cap over the lifetime of the portfolio), the portfolio dynamically adjusts the risk downwards and into a less volatile portfolio that favors capital preservation over accumulation.

All that is done through publicly traded ETFs that represent the asset classes but it's more granular then the way you typed it out. Rather then just being "large cap" it would be "US Large Cap", "ex-US Large Cap", "European Large Cap", "APAC Large Cap", etc. It's not just about risk though, with the most obvious modern example being crypto. Most advisors in 2025 are saying 2.5-5% of a portfolio can go into the asset class but does that make sense if you're investing for a down payment on a house in 5 years? You're going to want higher returning assets that are less volatile like infrastructure equity or private credit (same return profile, less volatile).

The net result is far greater risk adjusted returns and likelihood of actually achieving your financial goals because you've built your overall portfolio piece by piece with the goals as the building blocks.

itake•54m ago
> you're placed/bucketed into one of five portfolios that they offer and manage themselves.

this doesn't seem to be very different from what robo advisors do... where as they say, group you with the other people that have the same risk profile as you.

> What we do is factor in the risk appetite of the user plus the goal itself

I need some examples, b/c the goals you listed seem weird. Like trying to save $4k for a vacation, or car, seems like investing products aren't the right choice. You should keep that money cash in a HYSA and buy the thing when you have enough. If you're working with people with retirement funds, they probably would just cash out from their existing portfolio when they need to buy the expensive item.

> with a wide range of asset classes and a "glidepath" (target date) structure

I need to experiment more with the tools, but for high networth individuals with modest spending, glidepath models hurt long-term returns. For example, if someone invests $2,000/month for 45 years with a 9% real return, they could end up with $12.6M in an S&P 500 portfolio. At today’s 1.27% dividend yield, that’s $160K/year in passive income, which is enough to cover an 2x the average American lifestyle. So why shift away from an aggressive portfolio like the S&P 500 in retirement? If there is a big draw down in the market at the start of retirement, reducing the portfolio to $6.3m (half!), keeping 1 yr cash, reduce expenses by 20%, and as the market recovers you'd only pull out 1-5 years of money (2.5% per year - dividend payouts). Obviously, not ideal, but you're still not going be homeless at age 90.

ryao•5h ago
The website says “$8.50/month” and “$99 billed annually” for Pro Annual. Those numbers are inconsistent. $99 annually is $8.25/month. Usually, one would expect a wealth management service to be able to divide 99 by 12 correctly. Failing to do this is not very encouraging.
brailsafe•4h ago
Monthly doesn't make sense either. Is it monthly or is it quarterly? $10/month > $29 quarterly.

Whether it's legit or not, it's seeming like a lot of Show HN posts that make the front page are giving vibes of "Ah, another AI generated tailwind/Stripe template that collects emails and was slapped together in an hour". They have SEC registration but don't have literally any information on their about us for a company I'd need to be able to trust

workworkwork71•3h ago
Very fair comments, platform was not slapped together with AI. Landing redesign, was. We're in the process of putting a more robust about us page now with more details about us and the company.
bcyn•4h ago
It read to me as a (very) small discount for choosing to be billed annually vs. monthly.
workworkwork71•3h ago
Yeah, it's a $20 discount billed annually.
ryao•1h ago
Then that would be $100 per year and none of your numbers for annual plans are accurate. Your website claims $99 per year and claims that is equivalent to $8.50 per month. None of these 3 numbers are equivalent.
workworkwork71•1h ago
You're correct! I made the fix.
ryao•1h ago
The discount is applied to $10/month and is said to make it effectively $8.5 per month, but is actually $8.25 per month, since they claim to charge $99 per year.
crsv•4h ago
Was this platform built by vibe coding?
workworkwork71•3h ago
No, it wasn't.