frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

Open in hackernews

Technical co-founder, built everything. Offered 4%. Oof

4•cabbagepancakes•6h ago
I wanted to share a cautionary tale and get your take:

Note - I had AI help me turn my billion-page story to a reasonable length.

I understand I was naive in this, but I was trying so hard to do my best work that I didn’t look at the whole situation objectively. That’s on me.

The truth is, no calculator or startup blog can account for all the variables in a situation like this — execution, risk, emotional labor, trust, money, time. So I’m turning to the real-world experience of people here. Appreciate any thoughts.

I spent 7+ months as the technical co-founder on a startup. I built everything — backend, frontend, auth, UI/UX, integrations, hosting. There was no product before I joined, just an 8-year-old idea (yes, I know) and some outdated PDFs (just designs). I also paid out of pocket for tools and brought in a second dev a few times to help with tedious work so I could focus on core functionality. I spent money while they spent zero, so I could, now in hindsight, make their dreams come true.

The non-technical founder, who called it their “baby,” legit contributed no money. They didn’t want to earn income due to low-income housing restrictions… They wouldn’t even set up a Google Workspace account for a proper email. There was no business plan, pricing model, Stripe setup, or legal entity. Just a 30-ish person waitlist from a year-old landing page form and vague claims like “some people said they’d use it.” However, before a company was formed or a product was launched, they somehow sponsored a fundraiser and the logo of the “company” was put on the event’s marketing materials.

Despite all this, I stayed committed. Even though they initially said 50/50 would work, I realized it probably wouldn’t work out in the long run and that I’d end up taking on more than 50% of the work for the company. I told them they should get more equity because I might not stay forever, but I wouldn’t leave them in the lurch. I’d get it launched, help with transition, and do things the right way. I just said, “we’ll come up with something fair.”

When it came time to formalize equity, I got a “final offer”:

– 2% equity with possible reimbursement for expenses later – or 4% equity with no reimbursement and no recognition as a founder

They said anything more would “scare investors,” based on free advice from an accelerator/startup lawyer. I had done all the work, paid for everything, built all of it, and now wasn’t considered a real co-founder even though I did co-founder work because I might leave at some point, but wouldn’t leave them hanging.

There were no deliverables without me. There was no code, no UX, no logic. I hadn’t launched it yet, so I walked away and kept the code and IP (they have never seen a line of code and didn’t have access to my repo).

A few days later, a barista at the cafe I used to work from told me they were building a similar product (so, clearly it was a novel idea…). They and their co-founder already had 200+ signups after having a landing page up for a week, were paying their developer, had Stripe in place, and dozens of internal docs. How was the barista paying for their product to be built, you may ask: by taking a second job as a barista. They made it work.

That moment really drove it home: I had confused generosity with partnership. And that line turned into exploitation. The whole thing has made me hesitant to look for a co-founder for the project I’m currently building.

So here’s my ask:

– Have you dealt with similar founder dynamics? – What would you have done differently to protect yourself if someone had an idea you believed in, but they couldn’t afford to pay for any legal fees? – How do you vet a potential partner? Yes, it’s business, but does it have to be so “hardcore” with everyone? Or was I in a weird situation? Or just dumb? – Is it possible to partner early without formal agreements that feel adversarial?

Comments

margarina72•5h ago
[IANAL and usual disclaimers apply] (edit - misread the end of the post - slight correction)

"if someone had an idea you believed in" but didn't have any meaningful contribution to its realisation? Well, if you are going to build everything, why bother partner with them.

- "How do you vet a potential partner?" Test the trust on simple things, do they acknowledge their own error? Do they pay their share (either in sweat or cash)? Do they lie? It doesn't have to be hardcore, but with the wrong people it is.

- "Is it possible to partner early without formal agreements?" Sure, but again, with or without contracts, it all comes down to relationships. Contracts are a fail-safe, in case things goes wrong. Having a contract doesn't mean people will abide by the contract. When things go wrong, a contract is nothing more than a piece of paper that can use in court. Until you go to court and judgement is made people can do a lot of things that have nothing to do with the contract.

That's why the more important thing you need when partnering with someone is a healthy approach to work and a good relationship.

In general it is hard to find a good partner, especially for a first venture, it is easier when you have a network and people you worked with in a client relationship, and then they usually bring more to the table than sweat equity, or pure cash.

fwsgonzo•5h ago
Ideas are a dime a dozen. Completely meaningless. Being able to create something from nothing and deliver a usable product is, as you know, everything.

Your situation is eerily similar to something in my past, and probably many others. I don't think it's a good idea to do things without formal agreements. Try to do it solo for as long as possible and hire the help you need.

Sometimes if you're lucky you'll meet incredible people who contribute in ways that is essentially innovating on their own, maybe even adding more legs to stand on. I think that's where it's natural for 50/50 partnership discussions to occur. How you can make an agreement if you don't know who you're partnering with? It generally takes some time to get to know someone.

Anyway, just my rambling.

bob1029•5h ago
The harsh reality is that the technology is mostly a liability in business. Every line of code and vendor integration is downside waiting to happen.

It is only obvious that the technology person might be worth 50%+ of a company when paying customers are lining up and reporting happy experiences.

I've been in essentially the same position. Writing code is cheap. Finding people who are willing to pay for your software is hard. From a market dynamics perspective, I do think it's fair for a technical cofounder to receive a smaller slice of the pie, especially in domains that are inherently non-technical.

For example, managing customer relationships in banking is a very expensive and time consuming process. You often have to physically fly people to customer sites to have meetings. The domain experts are generally busting their asses throughout the entire sales cycle. The technology people typically get to sit at home and respond to email and teams calls. Way more async. Way less time in the airport. Maybe not entitled to as much of the pie as a result.

I'd also look at it like this - no one is going to pay you more equity for embellishing complexity. It might work for a while and to a small extent, but eventually you are just crippling your own personal margins. If you could have actually solved the problem entirely in the RDBMS in 40 hours for 4% equity, you could go do it again a bunch of times. When you're managing a Rube Goldberg machine, you've got no bandwidth to work on any other projects.

If someone with a well populated sales funnel offered me 4% for my services, I would strongly consider in 100% of cases.

jvojak•3h ago
If you do not know who you're working with, it is a good practice to understand each others demands and views. Having something written doesn't do much, but at least you should've verbally understood each others needs.

My understanding is that you were in love with the technology or the project, but did not pay attention to who you're working with.

Even though 4% can be too little or too much (you are the one to decide that for you), having a more clear picture earlier would have resolved it prior to you putting all those hours and commitment.

"What would you have done differently to protect yourself if someone had an idea you believed in, but they couldn’t afford to pay for any legal fees?"

It is a tough one. Unfortunately, it is hard to partner with people who you do not know well. My best advice would be to constantly report to each other how one would work to develop, implement or expand the potential business, because waiting for you to work on for months without doing much work on their own is a red flag for me. There is a ton of improvements and steps (even preparation ones) that could be done in the process.

"Is it possible to partner early without formal agreements that feel adversarial?"

It is more possible the better you know the person, but it is not advisable, as with every business and money, people change sides quickly, whenever they smell blood.