frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Personalizing esketamine treatment in TRD and TRBD

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1736114
1•PaulHoule•56s ago•0 comments

SpaceKit.xyz – a browser‑native VM for decentralized compute

https://spacekit.xyz
1•astorrivera•1m ago•1 comments

NotebookLM: The AI that only learns from you

https://byandrev.dev/en/blog/what-is-notebooklm
1•byandrev•1m ago•1 comments

Show HN: An open-source starter kit for developing with Postgres and ClickHouse

https://github.com/ClickHouse/postgres-clickhouse-stack
1•saisrirampur•2m ago•0 comments

Game Boy Advance d-pad capacitor measurements

https://gekkio.fi/blog/2026/game-boy-advance-d-pad-capacitor-measurements/
1•todsacerdoti•2m ago•0 comments

South Korean crypto firm accidentally sends $44B in bitcoins to users

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/crypto-firm-accidentally-sends-44-billion-bitcoins-use...
1•layer8•3m ago•0 comments

Apache Poison Fountain

https://gist.github.com/jwakely/a511a5cab5eb36d088ecd1659fcee1d5
1•atomic128•5m ago•1 comments

Web.whatsapp.com appears to be having issues syncing and sending messages

http://web.whatsapp.com
1•sabujp•5m ago•2 comments

Google in Your Terminal

https://gogcli.sh/
1•johlo•7m ago•0 comments

Shannon: Claude Code for Pen Testing: #1 on Github today

https://github.com/KeygraphHQ/shannon
1•hendler•7m ago•0 comments

Anthropic: Latest Claude model finds more than 500 vulnerabilities

https://www.scworld.com/news/anthropic-latest-claude-model-finds-more-than-500-vulnerabilities
2•Bender•12m ago•0 comments

Brooklyn cemetery plans human composting option, stirring interest and debate

https://www.cbsnews.com/newyork/news/brooklyn-green-wood-cemetery-human-composting/
1•geox•12m ago•0 comments

Why the 'Strivers' Are Right

https://greyenlightenment.com/2026/02/03/the-strivers-were-right-all-along/
1•paulpauper•13m ago•0 comments

Brain Dumps as a Literary Form

https://davegriffith.substack.com/p/brain-dumps-as-a-literary-form
1•gmays•13m ago•0 comments

Agentic Coding and the Problem of Oracles

https://epkconsulting.substack.com/p/agentic-coding-and-the-problem-of
1•qingsworkshop•14m ago•0 comments

Malicious packages for dYdX cryptocurrency exchange empties user wallets

https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/02/malicious-packages-for-dydx-cryptocurrency-exchange-empt...
1•Bender•14m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I built a <400ms latency voice agent that runs on a 4gb vram GTX 1650"

https://github.com/pheonix-delta/axiom-voice-agent
1•shubham-coder•15m ago•0 comments

Penisgate erupts at Olympics; scandal exposes risks of bulking your bulge

https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/02/penisgate-erupts-at-olympics-scandal-exposes-risks-of-bulk...
4•Bender•15m ago•0 comments

Arcan Explained: A browser for different webs

https://arcan-fe.com/2026/01/26/arcan-explained-a-browser-for-different-webs/
1•fanf2•17m ago•0 comments

What did we learn from the AI Village in 2025?

https://theaidigest.org/village/blog/what-we-learned-2025
1•mrkO99•17m ago•0 comments

An open replacement for the IBM 3174 Establishment Controller

https://github.com/lowobservable/oec
1•bri3d•20m ago•0 comments

The P in PGP isn't for pain: encrypting emails in the browser

https://ckardaris.github.io/blog/2026/02/07/encrypted-email.html
2•ckardaris•22m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Mirror Parliament where users vote on top of politicians and draft laws

https://github.com/fokdelafons/lustra
1•fokdelafons•22m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: Opus 4.6 ignoring instructions, how to use 4.5 in Claude Code instead?

1•Chance-Device•24m ago•0 comments

We Mourn Our Craft

https://nolanlawson.com/2026/02/07/we-mourn-our-craft/
1•ColinWright•27m ago•0 comments

Jim Fan calls pixels the ultimate motor controller

https://robotsandstartups.substack.com/p/humanoids-platform-urdf-kitchen-nvidias
1•robotlaunch•30m ago•0 comments

Exploring a Modern SMTPE 2110 Broadcast Truck with My Dad

https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2026/exploring-a-modern-smpte-2110-broadcast-truck-with-my-dad/
1•HotGarbage•30m ago•0 comments

AI UX Playground: Real-world examples of AI interaction design

https://www.aiuxplayground.com/
1•javiercr•31m ago•0 comments

The Field Guide to Design Futures

https://designfutures.guide/
1•andyjohnson0•32m ago•0 comments

The Other Leverage in Software and AI

https://tomtunguz.com/the-other-leverage-in-software-and-ai/
1•gmays•33m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Technical co-founder, built everything. Offered 4%. Oof

4•cabbagepancakes•7mo ago
I wanted to share a cautionary tale and get your take:

Note - I had AI help me turn my billion-page story to a reasonable length.

I understand I was naive in this, but I was trying so hard to do my best work that I didn’t look at the whole situation objectively. That’s on me.

The truth is, no calculator or startup blog can account for all the variables in a situation like this — execution, risk, emotional labor, trust, money, time. So I’m turning to the real-world experience of people here. Appreciate any thoughts.

I spent 7+ months as the technical co-founder on a startup. I built everything — backend, frontend, auth, UI/UX, integrations, hosting. There was no product before I joined, just an 8-year-old idea (yes, I know) and some outdated PDFs (just designs). I also paid out of pocket for tools and brought in a second dev a few times to help with tedious work so I could focus on core functionality. I spent money while they spent zero, so I could, now in hindsight, make their dreams come true.

The non-technical founder, who called it their “baby,” legit contributed no money. They didn’t want to earn income due to low-income housing restrictions… They wouldn’t even set up a Google Workspace account for a proper email. There was no business plan, pricing model, Stripe setup, or legal entity. Just a 30-ish person waitlist from a year-old landing page form and vague claims like “some people said they’d use it.” However, before a company was formed or a product was launched, they somehow sponsored a fundraiser and the logo of the “company” was put on the event’s marketing materials.

Despite all this, I stayed committed. Even though they initially said 50/50 would work, I realized it probably wouldn’t work out in the long run and that I’d end up taking on more than 50% of the work for the company. I told them they should get more equity because I might not stay forever, but I wouldn’t leave them in the lurch. I’d get it launched, help with transition, and do things the right way. I just said, “we’ll come up with something fair.”

When it came time to formalize equity, I got a “final offer”:

– 2% equity with possible reimbursement for expenses later – or 4% equity with no reimbursement and no recognition as a founder

They said anything more would “scare investors,” based on free advice from an accelerator/startup lawyer. I had done all the work, paid for everything, built all of it, and now wasn’t considered a real co-founder even though I did co-founder work because I might leave at some point, but wouldn’t leave them hanging.

There were no deliverables without me. There was no code, no UX, no logic. I hadn’t launched it yet, so I walked away and kept the code and IP (they have never seen a line of code and didn’t have access to my repo).

A few days later, a barista at the cafe I used to work from told me they were building a similar product (so, clearly it was a novel idea…). They and their co-founder already had 200+ signups after having a landing page up for a week, were paying their developer, had Stripe in place, and dozens of internal docs. How was the barista paying for their product to be built, you may ask: by taking a second job as a barista. They made it work.

That moment really drove it home: I had confused generosity with partnership. And that line turned into exploitation. The whole thing has made me hesitant to look for a co-founder for the project I’m currently building.

So here’s my ask:

– Have you dealt with similar founder dynamics? – What would you have done differently to protect yourself if someone had an idea you believed in, but they couldn’t afford to pay for any legal fees? – How do you vet a potential partner? Yes, it’s business, but does it have to be so “hardcore” with everyone? Or was I in a weird situation? Or just dumb? – Is it possible to partner early without formal agreements that feel adversarial?

Comments

margarina72•7mo ago
[IANAL and usual disclaimers apply] (edit - misread the end of the post - slight correction)

"if someone had an idea you believed in" but didn't have any meaningful contribution to its realisation? Well, if you are going to build everything, why bother partner with them.

- "How do you vet a potential partner?" Test the trust on simple things, do they acknowledge their own error? Do they pay their share (either in sweat or cash)? Do they lie? It doesn't have to be hardcore, but with the wrong people it is.

- "Is it possible to partner early without formal agreements?" Sure, but again, with or without contracts, it all comes down to relationships. Contracts are a fail-safe, in case things goes wrong. Having a contract doesn't mean people will abide by the contract. When things go wrong, a contract is nothing more than a piece of paper that can use in court. Until you go to court and judgement is made people can do a lot of things that have nothing to do with the contract.

That's why the more important thing you need when partnering with someone is a healthy approach to work and a good relationship.

In general it is hard to find a good partner, especially for a first venture, it is easier when you have a network and people you worked with in a client relationship, and then they usually bring more to the table than sweat equity, or pure cash.

fwsgonzo•7mo ago
Ideas are a dime a dozen. Completely meaningless. Being able to create something from nothing and deliver a usable product is, as you know, everything.

Your situation is eerily similar to something in my past, and probably many others. I don't think it's a good idea to do things without formal agreements. Try to do it solo for as long as possible and hire the help you need.

Sometimes if you're lucky you'll meet incredible people who contribute in ways that is essentially innovating on their own, maybe even adding more legs to stand on. I think that's where it's natural for 50/50 partnership discussions to occur. How you can make an agreement if you don't know who you're partnering with? It generally takes some time to get to know someone.

Anyway, just my rambling.

bob1029•7mo ago
The harsh reality is that the technology is mostly a liability in business. Every line of code and vendor integration is downside waiting to happen.

It is only obvious that the technology person might be worth 50%+ of a company when paying customers are lining up and reporting happy experiences.

I've been in essentially the same position. Writing code is cheap. Finding people who are willing to pay for your software is hard. From a market dynamics perspective, I do think it's fair for a technical cofounder to receive a smaller slice of the pie, especially in domains that are inherently non-technical.

For example, managing customer relationships in banking is a very expensive and time consuming process. You often have to physically fly people to customer sites to have meetings. The domain experts are generally busting their asses throughout the entire sales cycle. The technology people typically get to sit at home and respond to email and teams calls. Way more async. Way less time in the airport. Maybe not entitled to as much of the pie as a result.

I'd also look at it like this - no one is going to pay you more equity for embellishing complexity. It might work for a while and to a small extent, but eventually you are just crippling your own personal margins. If you could have actually solved the problem entirely in the RDBMS in 40 hours for 4% equity, you could go do it again a bunch of times. When you're managing a Rube Goldberg machine, you've got no bandwidth to work on any other projects.

If someone with a well populated sales funnel offered me 4% for my services, I would strongly consider in 100% of cases.

jvojak•7mo ago
If you do not know who you're working with, it is a good practice to understand each others demands and views. Having something written doesn't do much, but at least you should've verbally understood each others needs.

My understanding is that you were in love with the technology or the project, but did not pay attention to who you're working with.

Even though 4% can be too little or too much (you are the one to decide that for you), having a more clear picture earlier would have resolved it prior to you putting all those hours and commitment.

"What would you have done differently to protect yourself if someone had an idea you believed in, but they couldn’t afford to pay for any legal fees?"

It is a tough one. Unfortunately, it is hard to partner with people who you do not know well. My best advice would be to constantly report to each other how one would work to develop, implement or expand the potential business, because waiting for you to work on for months without doing much work on their own is a red flag for me. There is a ton of improvements and steps (even preparation ones) that could be done in the process.

"Is it possible to partner early without formal agreements that feel adversarial?"

It is more possible the better you know the person, but it is not advisable, as with every business and money, people change sides quickly, whenever they smell blood.

t_hinman_esq•7mo ago
Hi there! Startup attorney here, so sorry to hear that happened.

First off, it sounds like you absolutely made the right call walking away. You weren't dumb - you were generous, and that generosity was taken advantage of.

To answer your questions:

On protecting yourself legally: Even without money for lawyers, it's a good idea to get something in writing before writing a single line of code. A simple document covering equity split, IP ownership, and expense handling goes a long way. You can find free founder agreement templates online that are better than nothing.

On vetting partners: Look for concrete contributions, not just ideas. Red flags include unwillingness to invest personally (time or money) and vague promises about future value.

On whether everything needs to be "hardcore": No, but clear expectations aren't adversarial - they're professional. You can be friendly AND have proper agreements. In fact, good documentation often prevents relationships from turning sour.

The best partnerships balance contribution and reward. For your current project, don't let this experience make you overly cautious - just be appropriately cautious. Find someone who brings real value and is willing to formalize the relationship early.

Good luck with your new venture!